Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dearborn County Transportation AssessmentGeometrics Pavement Conditions FunctionRoadway Functional ClassificationDeficienciesStreetLength ofSegment# ofLanesLaneWidthShoulderWidthPavementTypePavementMarkingsPavementConditionAverage DailyTrafficSchool BusRouteLane WidthShoulderWidthPavement Condition(mi) (ft) (ft) (yes/no) (yes/no) (Category & Sub-Category)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Repair/PavingNeeded)ESTER RIDGE RD 0.80 2 8.1 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededESTER RIDGE RD 0.95 2 7.9 - Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairESTER RIDGE RD 1.06 2 8.2 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededESTER RIDGE RD 1.51 2 8.0 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededEUGENE CT 0.06 2 9.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -EWING RD 0.84 2 7.3 1.8 Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairFACKLER RD 0.24 2 9.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -FACKLER RD 0.99 2 8.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -FAIR MEADOWS DR 0.08 2 10.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -FAIR MEADOWS DR 0.43 2 9.7 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -FAIRWAY DR 0.13 2 11.0 1.5 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road A D -FAIRWAY DR 0.38 2 9.4 1.0 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -FALCON WAY 0.07 2 8.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -FALCON WAY 0.09 2 9.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -FARM LAND DR 0.43 2 24.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -FARMERS RETREAT RD 0.49 2 8.8 - Paved NO Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -FARMERS RETREAT RD 0.53 2 8.0 2.3 Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D A -FARMERS RETREAT RD 1.03 2 7.8 - Paved YES Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -FELLER RD 0.75 2 8.0 - Paved YES Fair - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -FELLER RD 0.96 2 7.9 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -FIVE POINT RD 1.07 2 8.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -FIVE POINT RD 1.41 2 8.0 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -FLOYD CT 0.01 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -FLOYD CT 0.07 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -FOUR WAY ACRES 0.35 2 6.7 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairFOX RD 0.46 2 6.6 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededFOX RD 0.47 2 6.0 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -FRANKLIN ST 0.05 2 7.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Urban Local Road D D -FRANKLIN ST 0.06 2 8.6 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Urban Local Road D D -FRANKLIN ST 0.22 2 9.7 - Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Urban Local Road D D RepairFUCHS RD 0.45 2 7.2 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededGABBARD DR 0.04 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GABBARD DR 0.07 2 9.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GABBARD DR 0.08 2 9.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GABBARD DR 0.10 2 8.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GARDEN GREEN DR 0.15 2 9.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GARDEN MEADOWS DR 0.10 2 10.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -GARDEN MEADOWS DR 0.16 2 9.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GARY DR 0.28 2 23.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -GATCH HILL RD 1.15 2 8.8 1.2 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -GAYNOR RIDGE RD 0.07 2 7.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GAYNOR RIDGE RD 0.20 2 10.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -GAYNOR RIDGE RD 0.47 2 8.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GAYNOR RIDGE RD 0.50 2 8.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GAYNOR RIDGE RD 0.73 2 8.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GAYNOR RIDGE RD 1.07 2 8.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GEIGER RD 1.67 2 7.7 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Local Road D D -GEORGETOWN RD 0.06 2 9.3 - Paved YES Good 2534 YES Category III Rural Local Road D D -GEORGETOWN RD 0.25 2 10.1 - Paved YES Good 2534 YES Category III Rural Local Road D D -GEORGETOWN RD 0.29 2 10.2 0.8 Paved YES Good 2534 YES Category III Rural Local Road D D -Dearborn CountyTransportation AssessmentAppendix APage 7 of 31
Dearborn County Transportation AssessmentGeometrics Pavement Conditions FunctionRoadway Functional ClassificationDeficienciesStreetLength ofSegment# ofLanesLaneWidthShoulderWidthPavementTypePavementMarkingsPavementConditionAverage DailyTrafficSchool BusRouteLane WidthShoulderWidthPavement Condition(mi) (ft) (ft) (yes/no) (yes/no) (Category & Sub-Category)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Repair/PavingNeeded)GEORGETOWN RD 0.33 2 9.8 - Paved YES Good 2534 YES Category III Rural Local Road D D -GEORGETOWN RD 0.36 2 9.5 0.8 Paved YES Good 2534 YES Category III Rural Local Road D D -GEORGETOWN RD 0.56 2 9.7 - Paved YES Good 2534 YES Category III Rural Local Road D D -GEORGETOWN RD 0.64 2 10.1 4.8 Paved YES Fair 2534 YES Category III Rural Local Road D D -GEORGETOWN RD 0.70 2 9.2 - Paved YES Good 2534 YES Category III Rural Local Road D D -GEORGETOWN RD 1.01 2 9.0 1.1 Paved YES Good 2534 YES Category III Rural Local Road D D -GHARTOM CIR 0.12 2 19.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -GIBSON DR 0.07 2 9.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GIBSON DR 0.08 2 10.5 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -GIBSON DR 0.10 2 9.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GIBSON DR 0.12 2 9.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GIBSON DR 0.19 2 10.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -GOLFVIEW CT 0.32 2 9.6 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GOOSE RUN RD 0.86 2 7.2 - Both NO Poor - NO Category II Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededGOOSE RUN RD 1.15 2 7.3 2.8 Both NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Local Road D D -GRAF RD 0.06 2 7.9 - Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairGRAF RD 0.50 2 5.4 - Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairGRAF RD 0.56 2 7.4 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededGRAHAM CT 0.10 2 9.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GRAND OAK DR 0.56 2 16.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -GREEN MEADOW DR 0.15 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GREENWOOD DR 0.15 2 10.2 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road A D -GREENWOOD DR 0.45 2 10.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -GREGORY RD 0.27 2 12.5 - Paved YES Fair - YES Category I Rural Local Road A D -GRELLE RD 0.50 2 7.7 1.3 Paved YES Fair - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -GRELLE RD 0.77 2 8.1 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -GRELLE RD 1.96 2 8.0 2.7 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D A -GRIMSLEY RD 0.25 2 7.2 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairGRUBBS RD 0.29 1 7.6 - Unpaved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GUTAPFEL RD 0.50 2 7.5 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GUTAPFEL RD 0.97 2 7.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -GUTMAN RD 0.65 2 5.9 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededGUTZWILLER RD 0.45 2 5.0 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededHAAS RD 0.09 2 9.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -HADDOCK DR 0.04 2 8.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -HADDOCK DR 0.18 2 9.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -HAGER RD 0.51 2 8.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -HAPPY HOLLOW RD 0.43 2 5.2 - Unpaved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -HAPPY HOLLOW RD 0.44 2 5.3 - Unpaved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -HAPPY HOLLOW RD 0.75 2 5.0 - Unpaved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -HARDING RD 0.55 2 7.9 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -HARMONY HILL DR 0.08 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -HARMONY HILL DR 0.17 2 18.9 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -HARRIET AVE 0.11 2 10.8 0.8 Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -HARRINGTON RD 0.34 2 5.2 - Unpaved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -HARRISON ST 0.13 2 7.0 - Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairHARTLAND CT 0.12 2 10.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -HARTMAN RD 1.00 2 7.4 1.1 Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededHARVEY RD 0.30 2 8.3 - Paved YES Fair - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -HAUBROCK RD 0.65 2 6.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -Dearborn CountyTransportation AssessmentAppendix APage 8 of 31
Page 1 and 2:
Dearborn CountyTransportationAssess
Page 3 and 4:
5.3 TRAFFIC COUNT RECOMMENDATIONS .
Page 5 and 6:
ChapterONEEXISTING CONDITIONS1.1 ST
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 1-1 - Study Area MapDearborn
Page 9 and 10:
DillsboroThe town of Dillsboro was
Page 11 and 12:
1.3.2 EmploymentTable 1B - Study Ar
Page 13 and 14:
1.3.3 EconomicsTotalHouseholdsMedia
Page 15 and 16:
State Route 1SR 1 travels north-sou
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 1-5 - 2001 Annual Average Da
Page 19 and 20:
1.4.2 Intermodal Transportation Opt
Page 21 and 22:
1.6 REVIEW OF RELATED STUDIESNumero
Page 23 and 24:
to US 50. The new roadway will be a
Page 25 and 26:
urban boundary will need to be upda
Page 27 and 28:
Table 2C - Local Roadway Sub-Catego
Page 29 and 30:
Street1ST ST2ND ST3 MILE RDG3RD ST4
Page 31 and 32:
StreetCategory& Sub-CategoryStreetC
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44: StreetCategory& Sub-CategoryStreetC
Page 49 and 50: 2.3 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION EXAMP
Page 51 and 52: Dearborn County Transportation Asse
Page 66 and 67: Figure 3-1 - Pavement TypeDearborn
Page 68 and 69: Lane & Shoulder Width DeficienciesE
Page 70 and 71: Figure 3-3 - Shoulder Width Deficie
Page 72 and 73: 3.5 GUARDRAIL INVENTORYThe length a
Page 74 and 75: CHAPTERFOURSELECTED ROADWAYCAPACITY
Page 76 and 77: Table 4B - Level of Service and Vol
Page 78 and 79: the community. Before undertaking a
Page 80 and 81: ChapterFIVERECOMMENDATIONS5.1 ANALY
Page 82 and 83: Figure 5-1 - Arterial Roadways Reco
Page 84 and 85: Figure 5-3 - Local Roadways Recomme
Page 86 and 87: 5.4 TYPICAL COSTSWhen planning for
Page 120 and 121: Cole Ln.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 122 and 123: Cole Ln2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 124 and 125: Jamison.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 126 and 127: Jamison2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 128 and 129: N Dearborn.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 130 and 131: N Dearborn2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 132 and 133: State Line Rd.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 134 and 135: State Line Rd2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 136 and 137: Wilsons Creek.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 138 and 139: Wilsons Creek2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 140 and 141: York Ridge.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 142 and 143: York Ridge2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 144 and 145:
Cole Lane State Line Wilson Creek Y
Page 146 and 147:
Cole Ln. - Category III Rural Colle
Page 148 and 149:
Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 150 and 151:
Curve No. PVC PVT PVC Milepoint PVT
Page 152 and 153:
Wilson Creek Rd. - Category IV Rura
Page 154 and 155:
Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 156 and 157:
Jamison Rd. - Category IV Rural Art
Page 158 and 159:
N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
Page 160 and 161:
N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
show all

Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?