[1912] 2 Ch. 134 Page 11909 WL 15821 (Ch D)(Cite as: [1912] 2 Ch. 134)*134 In Re Joseph Stocks & Co., LimitedWilley v. Joseph Stocks & Co., Limited.ACTION.Chancery Division.Ch DEve J.1909 Oct. 28No Court Information In OriginalThe defendant company was incorporated in 1897 under the Companies Acts, 1862to 1890.*135 In November, 1897, the company offered for public subscription 225,000l.4l. per cent. debenture stock secured by a trust deed dated January 8, 1898, inthe usual form, whereby it was provided that the debenture stock should be heldsubject to the conditions set forth in the first schedule thereto. The first ofthe conditions empowered the company at any time before October 1, 1907, to givesix months' notice to the stockholders or any of them of the company's intentionto redeem the stock held by them at the price of 105l. for every 100l., and thatat the expiration of the notice the stock would be redeemed accordingly; and thecondition further provided that any of the stock not previously redeemed would beredeemed at par on October, 1, 1907, or as soon as the security therebyconstituted became enforceable, and that as and when any stock ought to beredeemed in accordance with those presents the company would subject to thoseconditions pay to the several holders of the stock the redemption moneystherefor, calculated, in the one case, at 105l. per 100l., and, in the othercase, at par. The third condition provided that every stockholder should beentitled to a certificate under the seal of the company stating the amount of thestock held by him and referring to those presents.The provisions relating to meetings of debenture stockholders were contained inthe third schedule to the trust deed, and clauses 15, 16, and 17 thereof providedas follows:--"15. A general meeting of the stockholders shall in addition to the powershereinbefore given have the following powers exerciseable by extraordinaryresolution, namely:--(1.) A power to sanction the release of any of the mortgaged premises.(2) Power to sanction any compromise or arrangement proposed to be madebetween the company and the stockholders provided that it is one which the Courtwould have jurisdiction to sanction under the Joint Stock Companies ArrangementAct, 1870, or any statutory modification thereof for the time being subsisting ifthe company were being wound up and the requisite majority at a meeting of thestockholders summoned pursuant to that Act or modification thereof aforesaid hadagreed thereto.(3.) Power generally to sanction any modification or compromise of therights of the stockholders against the company or against its property whethersuch rights shall arise under these presents or otherwise.(4.) Power to assent to any modification of the provisions contained inthese presents which shall be proposed by the company and assented to by thetrustees or trustee.(5.) ....16. An extraordinary resolution passed at a general meeting of thestockholders duly convened and held in accordance with these presents shall bebinding upon all the stockholders whether present or not present at such meetingand each of the stockholders shall be bound to give effect thereto accordinglyand the passing of any such resolution shall be conclusive evidence that thecircumstances justify the passing thereof the intention being that it shall restwith the meeting without right of appeal therefrom to determine whether or notthe circumstances justify the passing of such resolution. *136 17. The expression'extraordinary resolution' when used in this schedule means a resolution passedCopr. © West 2004 No Claim to Orig. Govt. Works
[1912] 2 Ch. 134 Page 21909 WL 15821 (Ch D)(Cite as: [1912] 2 Ch. 134)at a meeting of the stockholders duly convened and held in accordance with theprovisions herein contained at which an absolute majority in value of the wholebody of the stockholders shall be present in person or by proxy and carried by amajority consisting of not less than three-fourths in value of such clearmajority upon a show of hands or if a poll is duly demanded then by a likemajority at the poll."In 1904 the company was indebted in a considerable amount to its bankers, whohaving regard to the fact that the debenture stock of the company was falling dueat an early date, required their debt to be paid off or substantially reduced. Itwas eventually agreed between the company and the bank that the debt should bereduced by annual instalments and that the company should arrange with thedebenture stock holders to postpone the due date of payment until the debt to thebank should be paid.In order to carry out this arrangement a meeting of the stockholders was dulyconvened under the provisions of the third schedule, and held on September 6,1904, for the purpose of passing as an "extraordinary resolution" the followingresolution:--"That the debenture holders consent to the conversion of their existing 4 percent. first mortgage debenture stock redeemable at par on the 1st day of October,1907, into or for 4 1/2 per cent. irredeemable debenture stock. Interest on thenew irredeemable stock to commence as from the 1st of October, 1904."On a poll the resolution was carried, holders of stock to the total amount of148,500l. voting in favour of it, and holders to the amount of 5250l. votingagainst it.By an indenture of October 3, 1904, made between the company of the one partand the trustees of the other part, the terms of the trust deed were modified bysubstituting 4 1/2 per cent. for 4 per cent. as the rate of interest on thedebenture stock and by taking away from the stockholders the right to repaymenton October 1, 1907, or at any time until and unless the company should go intoliquidation or make some default by reason of which the charge created by thetrust deed should become enforceable, and by conferring upon the company thepower to redeem any stock upon giving six months' notice of its intention so todo.The plaintiffs, who were holders of about 800l. debenture stock, some beingoriginal subscribers and the others having purchased their holdings in or about1900, gave notice to the company,--the plaintiff Willey in September, 1904, andthe other plaintiffs in April, 1905,--refusing to be bound by the resolution, andthat they would rely upon the terms upon which the stock was originally issued.Immediately after October 1, 1907, the plaintiffs applied to the company forpayment of the principal money and interest owing to them in respect of the stockheld by them, but the company refused payment, contending that the plaintiffswere bound by the resolution and supplemental deed.The plaintiffs then commenced this action on behalf of themselves and all otherstockholders who had not consented to be bound by the deed of October 3, 1904,against the company and the surviving trustee of the trust deed, claiming (1.)payment by the company of the principal amount of the *137 stock held by themrespectively with interest at 4 per cent., (2.) that the charge created by thetrust deed might be enforced by sale, and (3.) so far as necessary, execution ofthe trusts of the trust deed.Gore-Browne, K.C., A. R. Kirby, and Tomlin, for the plaintiffs, contended(inter alia) that the word "irredeemable" in the resolution meant "not redeemableby the mortgagor," and that by converting "redeemable" into "irredeemable"debentures the company had lost its right to redeem; and, further, that as therewas in existence no dispute to compromise, the majority of the stockholders hadno power to bind the minority by the extraordinary resolution in question. Theycited Hyde v. Wrench [FN1]; HIn re Chicago and North West Granaries Co. [FN2]; HInre Southern Brazilian Rio Grande Do Sul Ry. Co. [FN3]; Hay v. Swedish andNorwegian Ry. Co. [FN4]; and Mercantile Investment and General Trust Co. v.International Co. of Mexico. [FN5]Copr. © West 2004 No Claim to Orig. Govt. Works