Tesco v Constain - Thomson Reuters

JBL 1987, Mar, 122-130 Page 7(Cite as: J.B.L. 1987, MAR, 122-130)FN2. Atiyah, ""Contracts, Promises and the Law of Obligations" 94 L.Q.R. 193.FN3. Macaulay, ""Non-Contractual Relations in Business" (1963) 28 Am.Soc.Rev. 45;Beale and Dugdale, ""Contracts Between Businessmen: Planning and the Use ofContractual Remedies" (1975) 2 Brit.J. Law and Soc. 18; Yates, Exclusion Clausesin Contracts (2nd ed. 1982) pp.19-33; Lewis, ""Contracts Between Businessmen:Reform of the Law of Firm Offers and an Empirical Study of Tendering Practices inthe Building Industry" (1982) 9 Brit.J. Law and Soc. 153. John Livermore,""Exemption Clauses in Inter-Business Contracts" [1986] J.B.L. 90.FN4. Macaulay, ibid.FN5. Ibid.FN6. Macneil, ""Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations UnderClassical, Neoclassical and Relational Contract Law" (1978) 72 NorthwesternUniv.L.R. 854.FN7. Beale and Dugdale, ibid. note 3.FN8. Hoggat, ""Changing a bargain by Confirming it" (1970) 33 M.L.R. 18.FN9. Beale and Dugdale, ibid. note 3.FN10. Devlin, ibid. note 1 p.250.FN11. Ibid. p.260.FN12. Lagos v. Grunwaldt [1910] 1 K.B. 41, 47-48.FN13. Planche v. Colburn (1831) 3 Bing. 14.FN14. Comparisons have been drawn between these two cases for different purposesby Adams, ""The Battle of the Forms" [1983] J.B.L. 297.FN15. [1979] 1 All E.R. 965; Adams (1979) 95 L.Q.R. 481; Rawlings (1979) 42M.L.R. 715.FN16. Hyde v. Wrench (1840) 3 Beav. 334.FN17. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (3rd ed. 1981) p.55.FN18. Atiyah, ""Contracts, Promises and the Law of Obligations" (1978) 94 L.Q.R.193, 201.FN19. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (3rd ed. 1981) p.55.Copr. © West 2004 No Claim to Orig. Govt. Works