11.07.2015 Views

Tesco v Constain - Thomson Reuters

Tesco v Constain - Thomson Reuters

Tesco v Constain - Thomson Reuters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JBL 1987, Mar, 122-130 Page 8(Cite as: J.B.L. 1987, MAR, 122-130)FN20. Ibid. pp.55 and 71.FN21. [1984] 1 All E.R. 504.FN22. Goff and Jones, The Law of Restitution (2nd ed. 1978) Ch. 24.FN23. William Lacey Ltd. v. Davis [1957] 1 W.L.R. 932; Sanders and Forster Ltd.v. A. Monk and Co. Ltd. [1980] C.A. Transcript 35; O.T.M. Ltd. v. HydranauticsLtd. [1981] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 211, dictum of Parker J. at p. 214.FN24. Craven-Ellis v. Canons Ltd. [1936] 2 K.B. 403; William Lacey Ltd. v. Davis[1957] 1 W.L.R. 932, 939.FN25. [1984] 1 All E.R. 511.FN26. Adams, ""The Battle of the Forms" [1983] J.B.L. 297.FN27. Devlin, ""The Relation Between Commercial Law and Commercial Practice"(1951) 14 M.L.R. 249, 266.FN28. Ibid.FN29. Ibid. p.257.END OF DOCUMENTCopr. © West 2004 No Claim to Orig. Govt. Works

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!