11.07.2015 Views

Intercourse, by: Andrea Dworkin - Feminish

Intercourse, by: Andrea Dworkin - Feminish

Intercourse, by: Andrea Dworkin - Feminish

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bessie Smith’s voice “tramped through your three-dimensionalbody but gracefully, a spartan, bearlike ballet. ” And she couldbe very funny. O f a grade-school teacher who gave her trouble,<strong>Dworkin</strong> says, “I knew I’d get her someday and this is it: eatshit, bitch. No one said that sisterhood was easy. ”But when most people think of <strong>Andrea</strong> <strong>Dworkin</strong>, they thinkof two things: overalls (her uniform) and the idea that all sex isrape. That was the notorious interpretation of <strong>Intercourse</strong> <strong>by</strong>many when it first came out in 1987, and as <strong>Dworkin</strong> put it inher preface nine years later, the book is “ still being reviled inprint <strong>by</strong> people who have never read it, reduced to slogans <strong>by</strong>journalists posing as critics or sages or deep thinkers, treated asif it were odious and hateful <strong>by</strong> every asshole who thinks thatwhat will heal this violent world is more respect for dead whitemen. ” <strong>Intercourse</strong> is an inventive, combative, and wildly complicatedpiece of work, and to imagine that all there is betweenthese covers is the assertion that all sex is rape is about as sophisticatedas reducing Proust to a pile of madeleine crumbs.But you don’t have to be an asshole—or even a journalist—to take issue with some of what <strong>Dworkin</strong> said. Fury and dramacharacterize her rhetorical style, extremism her ideas, and <strong>Intercourse</strong>is perhaps her most radical work. “Am I saying Iknow more than men about fucking? Yes, I am, ” she tells us.And in a typical <strong>Dworkin</strong> flourish, she refuses to leave it at that;she gives her reader no room to soften her meaning throughmisinterpretation.“Not just different: more and better, ” she writes, “deeperand wider, the way anyone used knows the user. ” There is nota doubt in her mind that she’s right, and she consciously rejectsa writing style that is placating or solicitous: she’s notthat kind of girl.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!