11.07.2015 Views

National Human Development Report: 2001 - Indira Gandhi Institute ...

National Human Development Report: 2001 - Indira Gandhi Institute ...

National Human Development Report: 2001 - Indira Gandhi Institute ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

144THE STATE OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENTNATIONAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT <strong>2001</strong>TABLE 1.5<strong>Human</strong> Poverty Index — 1991(Not comparable with 1981)States/UTs Rural Urban CombinedValue Rank Value Rank Value RankAndhra Pradesh 43.19 20 25.12 25 38.34 19Arunachal Pradesh 50.75 29 25.65 26 47.40 30Assam 49.32 27 22.52 22 46.29 28Bihar 53.65 31 29.70 31 50.48 32Goa 15.58 1 13.78 3 36.10 17Gujarat 31.83 14 20.87 18 28.05 13Haryana 31.64 13 18.57 14 28.41 14Himachal Pradesh 21.67 4 9.91 1 20.90 5Jammu & Kashmir 34.94 15 17.67 10 30.95 15Karnataka 35.28 16 21.59 19 30.99 16Kerala 24.57 6 17.23 8 22.73 7Madhya Pradesh 45.43 23 25.69 27 40.79 22Maharashtra 29.30 11 17.65 9 24.73 8Manipur 43.84 21 26.51 28 39.82 21Meghalaya 55.81 32 20.15 17 49.41 31Mizoram 37.19 17 14.07 4 26.47 12Nagaland 45.00 22 23.56 24 41.30 23Orissa 47.97 26 28.29 30 45.22 27Punjab 28.04 9 18.47 13 25.25 10Rajasthan 51.17 30 26.73 29 44.73 26Sikkim 38.14 18 17.80 11 38.59 20Tamil Nadu 30.31 12 18.61 15 26.45 11Tripura 46.32 25 21.97 21 42.71 24Uttar Pradesh 50.02 28 32.62 32 46.65 29West Bengal 42.43 19 23.22 23 37.35 18Andaman & Nicobar Is. 28.80 10 16.32 7 25.24 9Chandigarh 25.07 7 15.07 5 15.96 2Dadra & Nagar Haveli 45.66 24 21.95 20 43.64 25Daman & Diu 23.88 5 15.82 6 19.90 4Delhi 21.02 3 17.99 12 18.23 3Lakshadweep 15.67 2 12.26 2 13.89 1Pondicherry 25.86 8 19.57 16 22.52 6All India 42.25 23.03 37.42Note 1 The <strong>Human</strong> Poverty Index is a composite of variables capturing deprivation in three dimensions of human development viz,economic, educational and health. These have been captured by proportion of population below poverty line, proportion ofpopulation without access to safe drinking water/sanitation/electricity, medical attention at birth/vaccination and proportionliving in Kutcha houses; proportion of illiterate population and children not enrolled in schools; and proportion of populationnot accepted to survive beyond age 40. See the Technical Note for the estimation methodology and other details.2 For sake of completeness, for some variables used in estimating the indices, the data for all States/UTs have beenestimated/assumed following, in general, principles of physical contiguity or similarity in socio-economic or demographicprofile.The details are available in Technical Note.3 These indices are not comparable with the HPIs estimated for 1981 on account of different variables used for capturingeconomic deprivation. The change facilitates use of more appropriate variables available since 1991.Source Estimated for the <strong>Report</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!