Strategic Review of the EDUCO Program - EQUIP123.net
Strategic Review of the EDUCO Program - EQUIP123.net
Strategic Review of the EDUCO Program - EQUIP123.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>EDUCO</strong> <strong>Program</strong>July 2010Following is an explanation <strong>of</strong> each option that evaluates its advantages and disadvantages. Implications<strong>of</strong> implementation by MINED are explained for each option, such as changes in laws, budget allocations,personnel restructuring, etc.Options that Maintain a Bifurcated SystemOption A. Continue <strong>EDUCO</strong> as it Currently ExistsThis option would continue existing policy in which <strong>the</strong> ACEs, run by <strong>the</strong> community, manage financialand administrative activities, govern <strong>the</strong> schools, and assume general accountability for teacher performance.Likewise, annual teacher contracts that <strong>the</strong> ACE administers and renews would be maintained.Finally, MINED, through <strong>the</strong> Departmental Education Offices, would continue issuing payment <strong>of</strong>wages to teachers on a monthly basis. This option would not affect CDE schools. The advantages anddisadvantages <strong>of</strong> this option are as follows:Access to educationAdvantagesContinues in rural, high povertyareas. Can quickly respond toemerging needs with <strong>the</strong> ACEs’expeditious procedures. Canachieve Social Education Plangoals in ACEs.DisadvantagesSituation for access to middleand high school levels is unclear.Specific studies are needed oncoverage at <strong>the</strong>se levels.QualityAdministrative andinstitutional managementLearning will not be radicallyaffected. ACE schools wouldcontinue performing at a levelcomparable to CDE schools.Local government andaccountability in ACE schoolsremain. The school budgetremains, which is higher forACE schools.The main problem wouldcontinue to be that students arenot learning what <strong>the</strong>y needto learn in ei<strong>the</strong>r ACE or CDEschools. Their test grades are stillvery low.Schools continue withoutpr<strong>of</strong>essional administrationwith leadership. MINEDwould continue with a highadministrative burden in itsdepartmental <strong>of</strong>fices.Human resources managementACE school teachers wouldcontinue attending schoolsmore. Annual contracts remain.Teachers receive more money inannual severance payments andyear-end bonuses.Teachers would not have <strong>the</strong>option to transfer. Tension overjob stability would continue.There is no system for complaintsand grievances.35