12.07.2015 Views

Strategic Review of the EDUCO Program - EQUIP123.net

Strategic Review of the EDUCO Program - EQUIP123.net

Strategic Review of the EDUCO Program - EQUIP123.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>EDUCO</strong> <strong>Program</strong>July 2010Several comments must be made about Table 6:The column for Option A has “0” in all rows because it is being judged relative to <strong>the</strong> current situation.A rapid analysis and count <strong>of</strong> “+” versus “-” symbols can lead to <strong>the</strong> conclusion that <strong>the</strong> research teamhas a strong, implicit preference for Option D. Concluding this would be inappropriate for two reasons.First, recommending preferred options was not part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this review—<strong>the</strong> decision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>route to take is an issue that Salvadorans need to resolve. (It is, however, important to mention that <strong>the</strong>impression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research team is that <strong>the</strong> stakeholders interviewed and <strong>the</strong> focus groups used to probeopinion are coming to <strong>the</strong> conclusion that Option D is <strong>the</strong> one that has <strong>the</strong> fewest problems, and <strong>the</strong> onethat shows a way toward <strong>the</strong> future, despite its high design and implementation costs. This is somethingthat <strong>the</strong> research team perceived between <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> first draft <strong>of</strong> this paper was submitted and thisversion.) Second, <strong>the</strong> symbols cannot be added up without weighting <strong>the</strong> scores in <strong>the</strong> rows and eachstakeholder will have a different weight for <strong>the</strong> rows. Briefly, <strong>the</strong> table shows that this option, althoughit has good benefits, also has relatively high costs (although <strong>the</strong> net benefit is positive). However,precisely because <strong>the</strong> option has so many “+” and “-”, this is an intellectually appealing option, and itshould stimulate careful examination and dialogue. (Which it has done, as can be demonstrated between<strong>the</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first draft <strong>of</strong> this paper and this version.)ConclusionBased on <strong>the</strong> general questions posed for this review, <strong>the</strong> research team presents some answers:Is <strong>EDUCO</strong>, as it has been designed and is currently being implemented, an effective means for ElSalvador to attain its educational goals for 2014 and beyond?The response apparently is that it is not, but nei<strong>the</strong>r is <strong>the</strong> CDE system. Nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> ACE nor CDE systemsare sufficient for attaining <strong>the</strong> expected goals. There are problems <strong>of</strong> governance and managementacross <strong>the</strong> sector, and especially in rural and low income areas. A bifurcated system has inefficienciesand is bureaucratically burdensome and does not create a sense <strong>of</strong> a “shared destiny” as a nation. However,<strong>EDUCO</strong> represents three historical achievements that many countries seek:• A culture <strong>of</strong> community participation as a social norm.• Accountability to parents.• Educational opportunities for <strong>the</strong> poorest in <strong>the</strong> population.It is extremely important that no solution squander <strong>the</strong>se achievements, or fail to appreciate <strong>the</strong> enormoussocial capital that has been invested to produce <strong>the</strong>se achievements.46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!