13-glenn-no-beauty-in-the-beast-israel-without-her-mascara-zionism-exposed

34REASONSIn short, all the childish charges that my detractors may level at me for the positions that I have taken areblown away like paper tigers in a windstorm when reviewed in light of the bigger picture, as well aswhen an individual takes his eyes off of his immediate surroundings and glances towards the horizon.Supremacism by any other nameBefore going into this explanation though, let us take a brief detour into something that needs to becovered if there is to be any progress made in this discussion. What must be stated before going anyfurther is that there is a massive distinction between this “respect” that is owed the Jews by virtue of theirmembership in the human race and the “respect” that is demanded from those who are the worshippersof Zionism and its blood-thirsty bastard child known as the state of Israel. These days, given the amountof propaganda that is mercilessly beamed at those living in the West, it cannot be assumed that the readerunderstands this concept in its proper context, and this demands therefore that a certain amount ofdiscussion takes place on this issue. Having perfected the Orwellian process of managing the affectionsof the masses for their own benefit, the doctors of disinformation and psychological warfare haveendeavored mightily to blur this distinction, and in judging from the conversations that are to be hadwith the average Westerner, they obviously have made good ground. Therefore then, let us begin thisdiscussion with the understanding that the “respect” that is demanded by the Zionists is not respect atall, but rather idolatry, albeit somewhat haphazardly masked. In its most unvarnished form it issupremacism, pure and simple, and not really that different from the flavor of supremacism made famousby the Nazis and which the West makes the pitiful attempt at pretending to despise.A brief examination of the personages and sentiments involved with this apocalyptic ideology, the Jewishsupremacist agenda responsible for the invasion and conquest of Palestine yesterday and the rest of theMiddle East tomorrow reveals nothing that even remotely resembles any precepts devoted tohumanitarianism or good intentions. Zionism is, was, and always will be a racist, exclusivist, ethnocentricsibling within the Marxist family, and possesses just as much a propensity for shedding innocentblood as has been famously possessed by her other sisters, Bolshevism, Leninism, communism, et al. Thisis by far one of the most peculiar things to note in the “friendship” that the West, and in particularAmerica, has maintained with the Zionist state, considering the fact that there was this thing known asthe ‘Cold War’ whose identity was inextricably wound within the mission of containing militant socialism.And yet, what we find is this contradiction that is impossible to explain rationally; the incalculable amountof resources, both in money and man hours that were expended over the course of several generations incountering the dialectic socialism of Russia, compared to the amount of money and man hours spent inpropping up the dialectic socialism of Zionism. It was a situation that even the Zionists themselves had ahard time explaining, as evidenced by one of the remarks made by one-time director of Mossad, IsserHarel, in his description of the unlikelihood of a union between America and Israel, given the fact thatthe Zionists were Russian socialists themselves.And if an individual can lose sight of the truth when weaving his way through the maze of politicaltheory and debate, the area from which there can be no loss of focus is when all of this is viewed inhuman terms that should be easily understood by all, and especially after considering the events thathave taken place over the course of the last century. If there were ever a time period within which mankindcould point to incomparable instances of human suffering on a mass scale that were the product of policiesthat were enacted by a few evil individuals, then certainly the 20th century should have left an indeliblemark upon the collective memory of the West and remained for some time. What’s worse is that in manyrespects, many do make the pretenses of understanding the seriousness of these events, but again, only inparticular instances, not general. Those in the West will obediently drone on and on about the evils of the