13-glenn-no-beauty-in-the-beast-israel-without-her-mascara-zionism-exposed

80THE REST OF THE STORYIslam by major media outlets that it isn’t alleged the adherents of this religion are pedophiles and enemiesof Christians.This is the other half of the story which Americans have not been and are not told. From the mouthpieceson the right such as Limbaugh, Liddy and Hannity, to the mouthpieces on the left who have their handsspread across all channels of information, this dirty little secret has been completely left out of the equationwhen people such as Pipes and his ilk begin quoting religious texts of Islam, a grandstanding done forthe sole purpose of furthering the cause of murdering, dispossessing, and robbing the peoples of theMiddle East. In defense of the adherents of Judaism, fairly it can be argued that such racist and abominablestatements cited above do not represent the sentiments of all followers of Judaism. In fact, it can be justlysaid that many are not and have never been acquainted with them at all. In like manner, perhaps thiscaveat should be applied to the Muslims as well, who in general harbor no ill feeling towards Christiansor their religion.One should not be naive enough to think that the bringers of information are not aware of the rest of thestory, and with this in mind, the American public who will be the ones paying the highest price for thewar against Islam must ask the logical and, considering the high stakes involved, fair questions of Mr.Pipes and those standing behind him:“In your discussion of the ugly side of Islam, why did you leave out the ugly side of Judaism? Why were relevantpassages of the Qur’an cited, but not of the Talmud? If religiously inspired sentiments such as those cited by youconcerning Islam are relevant towards understanding the war on terror, then why aren’t those sentiments harboredby the religion of Judaism relevant as well?”After, all, the noble mission that men such as he are professing to realize is the awakening of the averageAmerican to the dangers of religious fundamentalism, and surely that would include everything, wouldn’tit?How then, does one account for this obvious duplicity? What is one to make of those who deliberatelyrefuse to cite those passages of the Qur’an which speak well of Christianity, and who at the same timerefuse to reveal those notable sections of the Talmud which speak so hatefully against not only thepersonages of the Christian faith, but of its followers as well?The answer is not difficult to grasp. In its simplest explanation, its understanding resides in the fact thatthe people in charge of disseminating information to the American public do not have Muslim names. Byand large they are Jewish, and as a result promote information from a decidedly biased viewpoint infavor of Israel. The obvious importance of these circumstances should lead the average American toapproach information as pertains the Middle East with a certain amount of healthy skepticism, but thenone must consider the times in which these events are all taking place; It is the age of a commercialmindset, where, like the fast food business, everything is prepared quickly and likewise quickly consumedwithout much thought as to what is in it or what it may do to its consumer.A further explanation of the reason for this duplicity resides in understanding that there are those whoseraison d’être is the state of Israel and that which benefits her. These individuals portray themselves asloyal Americans, but who seem not to be bothered by the long list of ill effects which have resulted fromAmerican association with the Zionist state, an association which, in addition to the incontestable historyof espionage and subterfuge against America and her interests, has also resulted in the acquisition of newenemies which threaten her safety in demonstrably new and dangerous ways. Men like Pipes, Perle,