Darfur: Blueprint for Genocide - Archipielago Libertad
Darfur: Blueprint for Genocide - Archipielago Libertad
Darfur: Blueprint for Genocide - Archipielago Libertad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The United Nations Inter-Agency Fact Finding and Rapid<br />
Assessment Mission noted in April the obv ious ethnic<br />
targeting of v illages in the region they visited. It presented<br />
these findings in its April 2004 report:<br />
The 23 Fur villages in the Shattaya Administrative<br />
Unit have been completely depopulated, looted and<br />
burnt to the ground... Meanwhile, dotted alongside<br />
these charred locations are unharmed, populated<br />
and functioning ‘Arab’ settlements. In some<br />
locations, the distance between a destroyed Fur<br />
village and an Arab village is less than 500<br />
meters. 45<br />
At the end of June the United States Agency <strong>for</strong><br />
International Development (USAID) surveyed 578 villages.<br />
It showed 301 destroyed, 76 damaged and 199 intact. The<br />
survey of 578 villages was not exhaustive. A US official<br />
presenting the report said that US surveillance of v illages<br />
covered much but not all of <strong>Darfur</strong>. The USAID report on<br />
its satellite surveillance of <strong>Darfur</strong> at the end of August said<br />
that 405 v illages had been destroyed. 46 This report<br />
follow ed on from the Junesurvey but does not say whether<br />
it survey ed the same number of v illages or more. If the<br />
destruction of 405 out of 578 v illages was representativ e,<br />
we could infer that around 70% of <strong>Darfur</strong>’s villages had<br />
been destroyed by this point. 47 USAID material on satellite<br />
surveillance published on 10 September demonstrates a<br />
more ex tensive survey, indicating that 576 villages had<br />
been destroy ed and 152 damaged. 48<br />
‘Attacks have been<br />
supported by aerial<br />
bombardment…this<br />
requires planning.’<br />
These reports show that systematic destruction of v illages<br />
has continued unabated in contravention of UN Security<br />
Council resolutions, and despite the stated threat of<br />
possible economic sanctions.<br />
45 UN Inter-Agency Fact Finding and Rapid Assessment Mission<br />
(2004), Kailek Town; South <strong>Darfur</strong>.<br />
46 United States State Department (2004) Documenting Atrocities in<br />
<strong>Darfur</strong>, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor and the<br />
Bureau of Intelligence and Research (State Publication 11182).<br />
47 USAID (2004). <strong>Darfur</strong> Humanitarian Emergency Satellite<br />
Imagery, http://www.usaid.gov/locations/subsaharan_africa/sudan/satelliteimages.html,<br />
[Accessed 24 September<br />
2004].<br />
48 http://www.usaid.gov/locations/subsaharan_africa/sudan/darfurvillages_0910_tex<br />
t.html [Accessed 20<br />
November].<br />
Section 3: Systematic Actions Amounting to <strong>Genocide</strong><br />
The thoroughness of the looting and destruction makes<br />
future habitation of the villages all but impossible. The<br />
poisoning and blowing up of w ells – so v ital to survival in<br />
<strong>Darfur</strong>’s inhospitable environment – indicates that this is<br />
the intention of the Janjaweed and Sudanese Armed<br />
Forces.<br />
3.2.5 ‘Resettlement’<br />
There have been reports from journalists of resettlement of<br />
destroyed villages by Arabs. This coincides with the<br />
discovery by Human Rights Watch of a Gov ernment memo<br />
proposing the resettlement of Arabs in the deserted<br />
villages of <strong>Darfur</strong> and ordering the rehabilitation of wells to<br />
facilitate this. The memo also proposed to resettle the<br />
million or so displaced in 18 new locations. 49 This may<br />
hav e been in line with the recommendation in UN<br />
Resolution 1556 that safe areas be created. However, in<br />
prev ious similar situations, as in the Nuba mountains<br />
follow ing the campaign against the Nuba, the GoS set up<br />
‘peace v illages’ in w hich to resettle the Nuba that were<br />
more like ghettos or concentration camps. They were<br />
located in hostile terrain w ith wholly inadequate living<br />
conditions. 50<br />
There are fears that these proposed 18 camps may be<br />
more of such settlements, making displacement<br />
permanent. 51<br />
3.2.6 Detention<br />
Villagers are usually <strong>for</strong>cibly displaced from their v illages<br />
and <strong>for</strong>ced to move to big villages or towns which become<br />
IDP camps, guarded by Sudanese police and armed<br />
<strong>for</strong>ces, together with the Janjaweed. The IDPs are virtually<br />
prisoners w ithin these camps, unable to leave them even<br />
to carry out v ital life-support activities <strong>for</strong> fear of attacks by<br />
Janjaweed. The latest confirmation that this is still the case<br />
came from Louise Arbour, UN High Commissioner <strong>for</strong><br />
Refugees, who described the IDP camps as “prisons<br />
without walls” following her visit in September. 52 By<br />
keeping their v ictims inside <strong>Darfur</strong>, the Government of<br />
Sudan is concealing the scale of its crimes.<br />
Ev en inside the camps, women remain vulnerable to rape<br />
and humanitarianconditions are appalling.<br />
49 Minkey Worden, (2004) Khartoum’s Directives of Death, New York,<br />
Human Rights Watch.<br />
50 See section 2.2.<br />
51 Human Rights Watch (2004) UN Safe A reas Provide No Real<br />
Security, New York, Human Rights Watch<br />
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2004/09/01/darfur9286.htm, [Accessed<br />
25 October 2004].<br />
52 BBC (25 September 2004),<br />
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/3690232.stm, [Accessed 11<br />
October 2004].<br />
18