29.11.2012 Views

Darfur: Blueprint for Genocide - Archipielago Libertad

Darfur: Blueprint for Genocide - Archipielago Libertad

Darfur: Blueprint for Genocide - Archipielago Libertad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The United Nations Inter-Agency Fact Finding and Rapid<br />

Assessment Mission noted in April the obv ious ethnic<br />

targeting of v illages in the region they visited. It presented<br />

these findings in its April 2004 report:<br />

The 23 Fur villages in the Shattaya Administrative<br />

Unit have been completely depopulated, looted and<br />

burnt to the ground... Meanwhile, dotted alongside<br />

these charred locations are unharmed, populated<br />

and functioning ‘Arab’ settlements. In some<br />

locations, the distance between a destroyed Fur<br />

village and an Arab village is less than 500<br />

meters. 45<br />

At the end of June the United States Agency <strong>for</strong><br />

International Development (USAID) surveyed 578 villages.<br />

It showed 301 destroyed, 76 damaged and 199 intact. The<br />

survey of 578 villages was not exhaustive. A US official<br />

presenting the report said that US surveillance of v illages<br />

covered much but not all of <strong>Darfur</strong>. The USAID report on<br />

its satellite surveillance of <strong>Darfur</strong> at the end of August said<br />

that 405 v illages had been destroyed. 46 This report<br />

follow ed on from the Junesurvey but does not say whether<br />

it survey ed the same number of v illages or more. If the<br />

destruction of 405 out of 578 v illages was representativ e,<br />

we could infer that around 70% of <strong>Darfur</strong>’s villages had<br />

been destroyed by this point. 47 USAID material on satellite<br />

surveillance published on 10 September demonstrates a<br />

more ex tensive survey, indicating that 576 villages had<br />

been destroy ed and 152 damaged. 48<br />

‘Attacks have been<br />

supported by aerial<br />

bombardment…this<br />

requires planning.’<br />

These reports show that systematic destruction of v illages<br />

has continued unabated in contravention of UN Security<br />

Council resolutions, and despite the stated threat of<br />

possible economic sanctions.<br />

45 UN Inter-Agency Fact Finding and Rapid Assessment Mission<br />

(2004), Kailek Town; South <strong>Darfur</strong>.<br />

46 United States State Department (2004) Documenting Atrocities in<br />

<strong>Darfur</strong>, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor and the<br />

Bureau of Intelligence and Research (State Publication 11182).<br />

47 USAID (2004). <strong>Darfur</strong> Humanitarian Emergency Satellite<br />

Imagery, http://www.usaid.gov/locations/subsaharan_africa/sudan/satelliteimages.html,<br />

[Accessed 24 September<br />

2004].<br />

48 http://www.usaid.gov/locations/subsaharan_africa/sudan/darfurvillages_0910_tex<br />

t.html [Accessed 20<br />

November].<br />

Section 3: Systematic Actions Amounting to <strong>Genocide</strong><br />

The thoroughness of the looting and destruction makes<br />

future habitation of the villages all but impossible. The<br />

poisoning and blowing up of w ells – so v ital to survival in<br />

<strong>Darfur</strong>’s inhospitable environment – indicates that this is<br />

the intention of the Janjaweed and Sudanese Armed<br />

Forces.<br />

3.2.5 ‘Resettlement’<br />

There have been reports from journalists of resettlement of<br />

destroyed villages by Arabs. This coincides with the<br />

discovery by Human Rights Watch of a Gov ernment memo<br />

proposing the resettlement of Arabs in the deserted<br />

villages of <strong>Darfur</strong> and ordering the rehabilitation of wells to<br />

facilitate this. The memo also proposed to resettle the<br />

million or so displaced in 18 new locations. 49 This may<br />

hav e been in line with the recommendation in UN<br />

Resolution 1556 that safe areas be created. However, in<br />

prev ious similar situations, as in the Nuba mountains<br />

follow ing the campaign against the Nuba, the GoS set up<br />

‘peace v illages’ in w hich to resettle the Nuba that were<br />

more like ghettos or concentration camps. They were<br />

located in hostile terrain w ith wholly inadequate living<br />

conditions. 50<br />

There are fears that these proposed 18 camps may be<br />

more of such settlements, making displacement<br />

permanent. 51<br />

3.2.6 Detention<br />

Villagers are usually <strong>for</strong>cibly displaced from their v illages<br />

and <strong>for</strong>ced to move to big villages or towns which become<br />

IDP camps, guarded by Sudanese police and armed<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces, together with the Janjaweed. The IDPs are virtually<br />

prisoners w ithin these camps, unable to leave them even<br />

to carry out v ital life-support activities <strong>for</strong> fear of attacks by<br />

Janjaweed. The latest confirmation that this is still the case<br />

came from Louise Arbour, UN High Commissioner <strong>for</strong><br />

Refugees, who described the IDP camps as “prisons<br />

without walls” following her visit in September. 52 By<br />

keeping their v ictims inside <strong>Darfur</strong>, the Government of<br />

Sudan is concealing the scale of its crimes.<br />

Ev en inside the camps, women remain vulnerable to rape<br />

and humanitarianconditions are appalling.<br />

49 Minkey Worden, (2004) Khartoum’s Directives of Death, New York,<br />

Human Rights Watch.<br />

50 See section 2.2.<br />

51 Human Rights Watch (2004) UN Safe A reas Provide No Real<br />

Security, New York, Human Rights Watch<br />

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2004/09/01/darfur9286.htm, [Accessed<br />

25 October 2004].<br />

52 BBC (25 September 2004),<br />

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/3690232.stm, [Accessed 11<br />

October 2004].<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!