29.11.2012 Views

Darfur: Blueprint for Genocide - Archipielago Libertad

Darfur: Blueprint for Genocide - Archipielago Libertad

Darfur: Blueprint for Genocide - Archipielago Libertad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix G<br />

New In<strong>for</strong>mation: UN Inter Agency Fact Finding and Rapid Assessment Mission to Kailek publishes its report. Giv es<br />

details of its v isit to an IDP camp where the IDPs are virtual prisoners, w here there is no food and rape is a regular<br />

occurrence. Provides ev idence of GoS <strong>for</strong>ces’ complicity in the running of the camp. Concludes there is a strategy of<br />

sy stematic and deliberate starv ation.<br />

Human Rights Watch publishes the “<strong>Darfur</strong> in Flames” report which describes a government strategy of <strong>for</strong>ced<br />

displacement, targeting civ ilians of the non-Arab ethnic communities. Documents the aerial bombardment of civ ilians<br />

and attacks by GoS security <strong>for</strong>ces alongw ith militia men on Fur, Massaleit and Zaghaw a villages. Describes a<br />

climate of impunity.<br />

Latest situation: Peace agreement signed betw een the GoS, the SLA and JEM 8 th April in N’Djamena. 1 million<br />

internally displaced. British gov ernment states it is aw are of the systematic clearing of areas of <strong>Darfur</strong> based on<br />

ethnic origin. GoS denies access to UNHCHR inv estigators. Attacks and bombardments on villages continue despite<br />

the signing of a ceasefire.<br />

Peace Talks: SLA, JEM & GoS negotiations: 4 days after the signing of the peace agreement the SLA accuses<br />

gov ernment of attacks on tw ov illages. JEM accuses GoS of v iolating the ceasefire by integrating Janjaw eed into the<br />

army rather than disarming them. Much of the month is spent try ing to agree an agenda and location <strong>for</strong> further talks.<br />

International Response (Security Issues): Much international attention paid to the North South agreement.<br />

Attention to <strong>Darfur</strong> centred around the maintenance of the ceasefire. First Security Council attention giv en to <strong>Darfur</strong>.<br />

AU begins preparations <strong>for</strong> monitoring mission. US and EU urging the parties to the ceasefire to honour their<br />

agreements. Talks of military interv ention play ed dow n by the EU.<br />

International Organisations<br />

United Nations Security Council (UN SC): 1 Briefing. Released a statement ex pressing concern about the massiv e<br />

humanitarian crisis and called on the GoS and opposition groups to reach a ceasefire and a political settlement.<br />

Sends a Fact Finding mission to investigate allegations of w idespread atrocities. Deputy Secretary General of the<br />

Security Council approaches EU regarding deployment of troops to <strong>Darfur</strong>.<br />

AU: Takes responsibility <strong>for</strong> setting up the Ceasefire Commission and submits proposals to the GoS <strong>for</strong> a Ceasefire<br />

Commission and deployment of military observ ers.<br />

EU: Denies rumours that it has considered deploy ment of EU troops to <strong>Darfur</strong>.<br />

United States: Holding back on the easing of sanctions prev iously conditioned upon agreement of North/South<br />

peace deal until the <strong>Darfur</strong> crisis is resolved.<br />

UK: Stated the need <strong>for</strong> a ceasefire, preferably with international monitoring, with a view to securing humanitarian<br />

access. Rejected calls <strong>for</strong> a mandatory UN arms embargo on grounds it w ould not make a difference in the<br />

necessary timeframe.<br />

Security & Political Dialogue: May 2004<br />

A change in the language used by the international community to describe the situation indicates that the grav ity of<br />

the situation in <strong>Darfur</strong> is beginning to be realised. How ev er, the lack of attention in the Security Council belies a lack<br />

of urgency on the part of the international community despite the USAID w arning that 350,000 may die unless<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!