Resin Modified Pavement Demonstration Project.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2Open-Graded Mixture Aggregate GradationSieve SizePercent Passing by Weight19 mm (3/4 in.) 10012.5 mm (1/2 in.) 54-769.5 mm (3/8 in.) 38-604.75 mm (No. 4) 10-262.36 mm (No. 8) 8-16600 μm (No. 30) 4-1075 μm (No. 200) 1-3whereOptimum asphalt content = 3.25 αΣ 0.2α = 2.65/SGSG = apparent specific gravity of the combined aggregatesΣ = conventional specific surface area= 0.21G + 5.4S + 7.2s + 135fG = percentage of material retained on 4.75 mm sieveS = percentage of material passing 4.75 mm sieve and retained on600 μm sieves = percentage of material passing 600 μm sieve and retained on75 μm sievef = percentage of material passing 75 μm sieveOnce the optimum asphalt content is estimated using this equation, twoasphalt contents below this amount and two asphalt contents above this amountare used, along with the estimated optimum, in the laboratory production andevaluation of 75-mm (6-in.) diameter Marshall specimens. The open-graded ACspecimens are compacted with 25 blows from a 4.5-kg (10-lb) Marshall handhammer on one side of each specimen. The temperature of the laboratoryproduced asphalt mixture during compaction is usually around 121 C (250 F).After the laboratory specimens have been compacted and cooled, they are weighedin air and water to determine bulk density and void contents. The optimumasphalt content is typically selected where the resulting void content is nearest to30 percent.Resin modified groutG - 16
Standard ingredients. The standard ingredients in the resin modified groutinclude four materials common to PCC production: portland cement, sand, flyash, and water. No special requirements on portland cement are necessary for aquality grout. A Type I cement should be used unless special conditions requireanother cement type. A clean, sound, durable, and angular silica sand with agradation between the 1.18 mm (No. 16) sieve and 75 μm (No. 200) sieve isspecified to provide a high quality sand that will stay in suspension in the groutduring mixing and application. An ASTM C 618 Type F or Anonhydraulic@ flyash (ASTM 1995b) is used to help provide a consistent grout viscosity withoutspeeding up the grout's rate of setting. Water is added to the grout in an amountthat renders a w/c ratio from 0.65 to 0.70. The allowable tolerances for the resinmodified grout mix proportions are given in Table 3.Table 3Resin Modified Cement Grout Mixture ProportionsMaterialPercent by WeightType I Cement 34-40Silica Sand 16-20Fly Ash 16-20Water 22-26Resin Additive 2.5-3.5Resin additive. The resin additive used in the slurry grout is a proprietarymaterial produced in the United States by the Alyan Corporation under the internationaltrade name Prosalvia-7 or PL7. The additive is generally composedof five parts water, two parts of a cross polymer resin of styrene and butadiene,and one part water reducing agent. The additive significantly aids the constructionprocess by acting as a super-plasticizer in reducing the grout viscosity. Thereduced grout viscosity allows the grout to fully penetrate the open-gradedasphalt concrete layer more easily. The additive also increases the flexural andcompressive strength of the hardened grout, improves the grout's chemical andabrasion resistance, and reduces the grout's permeability after curing.Mix design. The goal of the slurry grout mix design is to determine theproportions of mix ingredients that will produce a slurry grout of the properviscosity. Grout viscosity is measured by the Marsh flow cone (schematicallyshown in Figure 1). The Marsh flow cone is used to measure the time of flux of1 L (0.264 gal) of grout through the cone. A high flow-time (too thick orviscous) grout does not penetrate the open-graded asphalt layer completely, whilea low flow-time grout may not gain sufficient strength and may promoteexcessive shrinkage cracking and segregation. Grouts with an acceptable initialviscosity will have a flow time between 8.0 and 10.0 sec.G - 17
Page 1:
Construction, Testing and Performan
Page 4 and 5:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe study reported h
Page 6 and 7:
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLESFigurePag
Page 8 and 9:
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES (Continu
Page 10 and 11:
Figure 3 - Plan view intersection o
Page 12 and 13:
Figure 5 - Intersection of US 72 an
Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 2 - Construction of Ultra-T
Page 16 and 17:
After the white pigmented concrete
Page 18 and 19:
Figure 12 - Whitetopping is given a
Page 20 and 21:
Chapter 3 - Construction of Resin M
Page 22 and 23:
Using 2” grout cube molds, six gr
Page 24 and 25:
cubic yards remaining in the last t
Page 26 and 27:
Figure 16 - APAC Corinth “drum”
Page 28 and 29:
Figure 20 - B & B Concrete Corinth
Page 30 and 31:
Figure 24 - 2” mortar cubes are m
Page 32 and 33:
Figure 28 - “Working the grout”
Page 34 and 35:
Figure 32 - Entire mat did not get
Page 36 and 37:
Attached in Appendix H is a complet
Page 38 and 39:
Figure 37 - Finish rolling30
Page 40 and 41:
were also utilized in the 75’ fai
Page 42 and 43:
of 72 or lower should be considered
Page 44 and 45:
Chapter 7 - ConclusionsUsing constr
Page 46 and 47:
APPENDIX ATRAFFIC DATA
Page 48 and 49:
Figure A2 - Yearly Itemized Project
Page 50 and 51:
Figure A4 - Year 2020 Projected 24
Page 52 and 53:
Figure A6 - Year 2020 Projected 24
Page 54 and 55:
Table B1 - Preconstruction Rut Data
Page 56 and 57:
Table B3 - Preconstruction Friction
Page 58 and 59:
Figure C1 - Ultra-Thin Whitetopping
Page 60 and 61:
Truck No 24 hour break 48 hour brea
Page 62 and 63:
Table C7 - UTW Smoothness Data coll
Page 64 and 65:
Table C10- Long Term Data for Ultra
Page 66 and 67:
APPENDIX DMDOT UTW STANDARD SPECIFI
Page 68 and 69:
design. Documentation presented mus
Page 70 and 71:
Payment will be made under:907-501-
Page 72 and 73:
Figure E1 - UTW 24 hour test report
Page 74 and 75:
Figure E5 - UTW 48 hour test report
Page 76 and 77: Figure E9 - UTW 7 day test report (
Page 78 and 79: Figure E12 - UTW 28 day test report
Page 82 and 83: Figure E17 - UTW 24 hour test repor
Page 84 and 85: Figure E21 - UTW 48 hour test repor
Page 92 and 93: Table F1 - Gradations, AC Contents
Page 94 and 95: Figure F4 - Aggregate Gradation Cha
Page 96 and 97: Table F7 - RMP Open Graded Mix Mat
Page 98 and 99: Table F11 - Air Voids in Mat @ Cass
Page 100 and 101: Table F15 - Thickness of Resin Modi
Page 102 and 103: Table F17 - Thickness of Resin Modi
Page 104 and 105: Table F19 - RMP grout design chartF
Page 106 and 107: Table F22 - RMP Grout Construction
Page 108 and 109: Table F28 - RMP Friction Data Colle
Page 110 and 111: APPENDIX GUSER’S GUIDE: RESIN MOD
Page 112 and 113: G - 2
Page 114 and 115: Technology Components and Sources..
Page 116 and 117: 1 Executive SummaryDescriptionResin
Page 118 and 119: stances, the RMP also provides cost
Page 120 and 121: 2 PreacquisitionDescription of Resi
Page 122 and 123: In 1987, the U.S. Army Corps of Eng
Page 124 and 125: Table 1RMP Project Locations in the
Page 128 and 129: The slurry grout mix design is cond
Page 130 and 131: Resin modified groutThe resin modif
Page 132 and 133: Table 4Slurry Grout Viscosity Requi
Page 134 and 135: G - 24
Page 136 and 137: G - 26
Page 138 and 139: CostsThe initial construction costs
Page 140 and 141: A quick comparison of the construct
Page 142 and 143: equired to support logistical opera
Page 144 and 145: Procurement SchedulingNormal constr
Page 146 and 147: PersonnelThe personnel normally req
Page 148 and 149: ReferencesAhlrich, R. C., and Ander
Page 150 and 151: APPENDIX HPG 82-22 HMA DATA
Page 152 and 153: Table H2 - PG 82-22 Designs with di
Page 154 and 155: Table H4 - PG 82-22 Gradation Chart
Page 156 and 157: Table H6 - PG 82-22 Inspectors Dail
Page 158 and 159: Figure H8 - PG 82-22 Quality Contro
Page 160 and 161: Figure H10 - PG 82-22 Truck Tickets
Page 162 and 163: Table H13 PG 82-22 Rut Measurements
Page 164 and 165: Table H15 - PG 82-22 Smoothness Dat
Page 166 and 167: APPENDIX ICOST DATA
Page 168 and 169: Table I2 - Resin Modified Pavement
show all

Resin Modified Pavement Demonstration Project.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?