12.07.2015 Views

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IMPERIALISM AND THE SPLIT IN SOCIALISM107Roman proletarian lived at the expense of society. Modernsociety lives at the expense of the modern proletarian.<strong>Marx</strong> specially stressed this profound observation of Sismondi.51 Imperialism somewhat changes the situation.A privileged upper stratum of the proletariat in the imperialistcountries lives partly at the expense of hundredsof millions in the uncivilised nations.It is clear why imperialism is moribund capitalism,capitalism in transition <strong>to</strong> socialism: monopoly, whichgrows out of capitalism, is already dying capitalism, thebeginning of its transition <strong>to</strong> socialism. The tremendoussocialisation of labour by imperialism (what its apologists—the bourgeois economists—call “interlocking”) producesthe same result.Advancing this definition of imperialism brings usin<strong>to</strong> complete contradiction <strong>to</strong> K. Kautsky, who refuses <strong>to</strong>regard imperialism as a “phase of capitalism” and definesit as a policy “preferred” by finance capital, a tendencyof “industrial” countries <strong>to</strong> annex “agrarian” countries.*Kautsky’s definition is thoroughly false from the theoreticalstandpoint. What distinguishes imperialism is therule not of industrial capital, but of finance capital, thestriving <strong>to</strong> annex not agrarian countries, particularly,but every kind of country. Kautsky divorces imperialistpolitics from imperialist economics, he divorces monopolyin politics from monopoly in economics in order <strong>to</strong> pavethe way for his vulgar bourgeois reformism, such as“disarmament”, “ultra-imperialism” and similar nonsense.The whole purpose and significance of this theoreticalfalsity is <strong>to</strong> obscure the most profound contradictionsof imperialism and thus justify the theory of “unity”with the apologists of imperialism, the outright socialchauvinistsand opportunists.We have dealt at sufficient length with Kautsky’sbreak with <strong>Marx</strong>ism on this point in Sotsial-Demokrat andKommunist. 52 Our Russian Kautskyites, the supporters* “Imperialism is a product of highly developed industrial capitalism.It consists in the striving of every industrial capitalist nation <strong>to</strong>subjugate and annex ever larger agrarian terri<strong>to</strong>ries, irrespective of thenations that inhabit them” (Kautsky in Die Neue Zeit, September 11,1914).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!