12.07.2015 Views

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A CARICATURE OF MARXISM69development is <strong>to</strong>wards the merging of nations? For thesame reason—we reply—that we advocate and, when in power,will implement the dicta<strong>to</strong>rship of the proletariat, thoughthe entire trend of development is <strong>to</strong>wards abolition ofcoercive domination of one part of society over another.Dicta<strong>to</strong>rship is domination of one part of society over therest of society, and domination, moreover, that rests directlyon coercion. Dicta<strong>to</strong>rship of the proletariat, the only consistentlyrevolutionary class, is necessary <strong>to</strong> overthrow thebourgeoisie and repel its attempts at counter-revolution. Thequestion of proletarian dicta<strong>to</strong>rship is of such overridingimportance that he who denies the need for such dicta<strong>to</strong>rship,or recognises it only in words, cannot be a member ofthe Social-Democratic Party. However, it cannot be deniedthat in individual cases, by way of exception, for instance,in some small country after the social revolution has beenaccomplished in a neighbouring big country, peaceful surrenderof power by the bourgeoisie is possible, if it is convincedthat resistance is hopeless and if it prefers <strong>to</strong> save itsskin. It is much more likely, of course, that even in smallstates socialism will not be achieved without civil war, andfor that reason the only programme of international Social-Democracy must be recognition of civil war, though violenceis, of course, alien <strong>to</strong> our ideals. The same, mutatis mutandis(with the necessary alterations), is applicable <strong>to</strong> nations.We favour their merger, but now there can be no transitionfrom forcible merger and annexation <strong>to</strong> voluntary mergerwithout freedom of secession. We recognise—and quite rightly—the predominance of the economic fac<strong>to</strong>r, but <strong>to</strong> interpretit à la Kievsky is <strong>to</strong> make a caricature of <strong>Marx</strong>ism. Eventhe trusts and banks of modern imperialism, though inevitableeverywhere as part of developed capitalism, differ intheir concrete aspects from country <strong>to</strong> country. There isa still greater difference, despite homogeneity in essentials,between political forms in the advanced imperialist countries—America,England, France, Germany. The samevariety will manifest itself also in the path mankind willfollow from the imperialism of <strong>to</strong>day <strong>to</strong> the socialist revolutionof <strong>to</strong>morrow. All nations will arrive at socialism—thisis inevitable, but all will do so in not exactly the same way,each will contribute something of its own <strong>to</strong> some form of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!