12.07.2015 Views

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36V. I. LENIN2. “OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE NEW ERA”The heading is Kievsky’s. He constantly speaks of a “newera”, but here, <strong>to</strong>o, unfortunately his arguments are erroneous.Our Party resolutions speak of the present war as stemmingfrom the general conditions of the imperialist era. We givea correct <strong>Marx</strong>ist definition of the relation between the “era”and the “present war”: <strong>Marx</strong>ism requires a concrete assessmen<strong>to</strong>f each separate war. To understand why an imperialistwar, i.e., a war thoroughly reactionary and anti-democraticin its political implications, could, and inevitably did,break out between the Great Powers, many of whom s<strong>to</strong>odat the head of the struggle for democracy in 1789-1871—<strong>to</strong>understand this we must understand the general conditionsof the imperialist era, i.e., the transformation of capitalismin the advanced countries in<strong>to</strong> imperialism.Kievsky has flagrantly dis<strong>to</strong>rted the relation between the“era” and the “present war”. In his reasoning, <strong>to</strong> consider thematter concretely means <strong>to</strong> examine the “era”. That is preciselywhere he is wrong.The era 1789-1871 was of special significance for Europe.That is irrefutable. We cannot understand a single nationalliberation war, and such wars were especially typical ofthat period, unless we understand the general conditions ofthe period. Does that mean that all wars of that period werenational liberation wars? Certainly not. To hold that viewis <strong>to</strong> reduce the whole thing <strong>to</strong> an absurdity and apply a ridiculousstereotype in place of a concrete analysis of eachseparate war. There were also colonial wars in 1789-1871,and wars between reactionary empires that oppressed manynations.Advanced European (and American) capitalism hasentered a new era of imperialism. Does it follow fromthat that only imperialist wars are now possible? Any suchcontention would be absurd. It would reveal inability <strong>to</strong>distinguish a given concrete phenomenon from the sum <strong>to</strong>talof variegated phenomena possible in a given era. An era iscalled an era precisely because it encompasses the sum <strong>to</strong>talof variegated phenomena and wars, typical and untypical,big and small, some peculiar <strong>to</strong> advanced countries, others

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!