12.07.2015 Views

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24V. I. LENINThat is all one trend of thought, one and the same theoreticaland practical political error Kievsky unwitting, makesat every step. He thinks he is arguing only against self-determination,he wants <strong>to</strong> argue only against self determination,but the result—against his will and conscience, and thatis the curious thing!—is that he has adduced not a singleargument which could not be just as well applied <strong>to</strong> democracyin general!The real source of all his curious logical errors and confusion—andthis applies not only <strong>to</strong> self-determination, butalso <strong>to</strong> defence of the fatherland, divorce, “rights” in general—liesin the oppression of his thinking by the war, whichmakes him completely dis<strong>to</strong>rt the <strong>Marx</strong>ist position ondemocracy.Imperialism is highly developed capitalism; imperialismis progressive; imperialism is the negation of democracy—“hence”, democracy is “unattainable” under capitalism.Imperialist war is a flagrant violation of all democracy,whether in backward monarchies or progressive republics—“hence”, there is no point in talking of “rights” (i.e., democracy!). The “only” thing that can be “opposed” <strong>to</strong> imperialistwar is socialism; socialism alone is “the way out”; “hence”,<strong>to</strong> advance democratic slogans in our minimum programme,i.e., under capitalism, is a deception or an illusion,befuddlement or postponement, etc., of the slogan of socialistrevolution.Though Kievsky does not realise it, that is the real sourceof all his mishaps. That is his basic logical error which, preciselybecause it is basic and is not realised by the author,“explodes” at every step like a punctured bicycle tire. It“bursts out” now on the question of defending the fatherland,now on the question of divorce, now in the phrase about“rights”, in this remarkable phrase (remarkable for its uttercontempt for “rights” and its utter failure <strong>to</strong> understand theissue): we shall discuss not rights, but the destruction of ageoldslavery!To say that is <strong>to</strong> show a lack of understanding of the relationshipbetween capitalism and democracy, between socialismand democracy.Capitalism in general, and imperialism in particular, turndemocracy in<strong>to</strong> an illusion—though at the same time capi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!