12.07.2015 Views

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE STORY OF ONE PERIOD285the further development of the party; it is a struggle agains<strong>to</strong>pportunism within the party, and an act of opposition <strong>to</strong> thereformists and in favour of revolutionary class struggle.”Feb. 3, 1917. A private meeting of Centrists (Grimm,Schneider, Rimathe and others) attended also by Nobsand Platten. Münzenberg and Dr. Bronski are invited butdecline.A decision is adopted <strong>to</strong> “amend” the majority resolutionin a way that materially worsens it and turns it in<strong>to</strong> a“Centrist resolution”, especially because paragraph 3 isdeleted and replaced by a deliberately indefinite and hazyexpression.Feb. 6, 1917. General meeting of Social-Democratic Partymembers in Zurich. Main item: committee elections.Poor attendance, especially on the part or workers.Platten suggests postponing the meeting. Social-patriotsand Nobs object. Proposal is defeated.Elections are held. When it turns out that Dr. Bronskiis elected, social-patriot Baumann announces on behalfof four committee members that he refuses <strong>to</strong> work withDr. Bronski.Platten suggests accepting this ultimatum (submitting <strong>to</strong>it), proposing (absolutely undemocratically and unlawfully)that the elections be declared invalid. That proposal iscarried!!!Feb. 9, 1917. Publication of a “new” majority resolution.The signatures: the “Centrists” Grimm, Rimathe, Schneider,Jacques Schmid, etc., also Nobs and Platten. The resolutionhas been greatly worsened and paragraph 3, as indicatedabove, deleted. 121The resolution does not even hint at combating opportunismand reformism, or at a firm decision <strong>to</strong> follow KarlLiebknecht’s tactics!It is a typical Centrist resolution, in which “general”,supposedly “theoretical” disquisitions predominate, whilepractical demands are deliberately couched in such feebleand hazy language that, it can be hoped, not only Greulichand G. Müller, but even Baumann—Zurich will probablydeign <strong>to</strong> withdraw their ultimatum and ... amnesty the party.To sum up: the leaders of the Swiss party have solemnlyburied Zimmerwaldism in the “marsh”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!