12.07.2015 Views

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BOURGEOIS PACIFISM AND SOCIALIST PACIFISM179this alliance, apparently, is <strong>to</strong> be the partition of Galicia(it is very important for tsarism <strong>to</strong> strangle the centre ofUkrainian agitation and Ukrainian liberty), Armenia andperhaps Rumania! In fact there was a “hint” in a Germannewspaper that Rumania might be divided among Austria,Bulgaria and Russia! Germany could agree <strong>to</strong> other minorconcessions <strong>to</strong> tsarism if only she could achieve an alliancewith Russia, and perhaps also with Japan, against England.A separate peace between Nicholas II and Wilhelm IIcould have been concluded secretly. There have been instancesin diplomatic his<strong>to</strong>ry of treaties known only <strong>to</strong> twoor three persons and kept secret from everyone else, evenCabinet Ministers. Diplomatic his<strong>to</strong>ry knows instances ofthe “Great Powers” gathering at “European” congressesafter the principal rivals had secretly decided the mainquestions among themselves (for example, the secret agreementbetween Russia and England <strong>to</strong> plunder Turkey, prior<strong>to</strong> the Berlin Congress of 1878). It would not be at all surprisingif tsarism rejected a formal separate peace betweenthe governments for the reason, among others, that the presentsituation in Russia might result in Milyukov and Guchkov,or Milyukov and Kerensky, taking over the government,while at the same time, it may have concluded a secret,informal, but none the less “durable” treaty withGermany <strong>to</strong> the effect that the two “high contracting parties”undertake jointly <strong>to</strong> pursue such-and-such a policy at theforthcoming peace congress!It is impossible <strong>to</strong> say whether or not this assumptionis correct. At any rate, it is a thousand times nearer thetruth, is a far better description of things as they actually arethan are the pious phrases about peace between the presentgovernments, or between any bourgeois governments forthat matter, on the basis of no annexations, etc. These phraseseither express innocent desires or are hypocrisy and liesmeant <strong>to</strong> conceal the truth. And the truth of the present time,of the present war, of the present attempts <strong>to</strong> conclude peace,is the division of the imperialist spoils. That is at the bot<strong>to</strong>mof it all; and <strong>to</strong> understand this truth, <strong>to</strong> express it, “<strong>to</strong>show things as they actually are”, is the fundamental taskof socialist policy as distinct from bourgeois policy, theprincipal aim of which is <strong>to</strong> conceal, <strong>to</strong> gloss over this truth.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!