Lenin CW-Vol. 23.pdf - From Marx to Mao

LECTURE ON THE 1905 REVOLUTION237human rights whatever. Owing to the deeds of Thy officialswe have become slaves.”The petition contains the following demands: amnesty,civil liberties, fair wages, gradual transfer of the land tothe people, convocation of a constituent assembly on thebasis of universal and equal suffrage. It ends with the followingwords:“Sire, do not refuse aid to Thy people! Demolish the wallthat separates Thee from Thy people. Order and promisethat our requests will be granted, and Thou wilt make Russiahappy; if not, we are ready to die on this very spot.We have only two roads: freedom and happiness, or thegrave.”Reading it now, this petition of uneducated, illiterateworkers, led by a patriarchal priest, creates a strangeimpression. Involuntarily one compares this naïve petitionwith the present peace resolutions of the social-pacifists,the would-be socialists who in reality are bourgeois phrasemongers.The unenlightened workers of pre-revolutionaryRussia did not know that the tsar was the head of the rulingclass, the class, namely, of big landowners, already boundby a thousand ties with the big bourgeoisie and prepared todefend their monopoly, privileges and profits by every meansof violence. The social-pacifists of today, who pretend to be“highly educated” people—no joking—do not realise that it isjust as foolish to expect a “democratic” peace from bourgeoisgovernments that are waging an imperialist predatorywar, as it was to believe that peaceful petitions wouldinduce the bloody tsar to grant democratic reforms.Nevertheless, there is a great difference between thetwo—the present-day social-pacifists are, to a large extent,hypocrites, who strive by gentle admonitions to divert thepeople from the revolutionary struggle, whereas the uneducatedworkers in pre-revolutionary Russia proved bytheir deeds that they were straightforward people awakenedto political consciousness for the first time.It is in this awakening of tremendous masses of the peopleto political consciousness and revolutionary strugglethat the historic significance of January 22, 1905 lies.“There is not yet a revolutionary people in Russia,”wrote Mr. Pyotr Struve, then leader of the Russian liberals