Murray, R. J., 1996: Explicit generation of orthogonal grids for ocean models. Journal ofComputational Physics, 126, 251–273.<strong>National</strong> Academies of Science, <strong>National</strong> Research Council (NRC), Board on AtmosphericSciences and <strong>Climate</strong> (BADC), 2007: Completing the <strong>Forecast</strong>: Characterizing andCommunicating Uncertainty for Better Decisions Using Weather and <strong>Climate</strong><strong>Forecast</strong>s. pp76.Neumann, C. J. (1999), <strong>The</strong> HURISK model: An adaptation for the SouthernHemisphere (A user’s manual) report, contract N00014-96-C-6015,31 pp., Sci. Appl. Int. Corp., Monterey, Calif.Onogi, K., J. Tsutsui, H. Koide, M. Sakamoto, S. Kobayashi, H. Hatsushika, T.Matsumoto, N. Yamazaki, H. Kamahori, K. Takahashi, S. Kadokura, K. Wada, K.Kato, R. Oyama, T. Ose, N. Mannoji and R. Taira, 2007: <strong>The</strong> JRA-25<strong>Reanalysis</strong>. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85, 3, 369-432.Pan, H. L., and L. Mahrt, 1987: Interaction between soil hydrology and boundary layerdevelopment, Boundary Layer Meteorology, 38, 185-202.Pan, H.-L. and W.-S. Wu, 1995: Implementing a mass flux convective parameterizationpackage for the NMC medium range forecast model. NMC Office Note 409,40 pp.[Available online at:http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/officenotes/FullTOC.html#1990 ]Paolino, D., Q. Yang, B. Doty, J. Kinter, J. Shukla, and D.M. Straus, 1995: A Pilot<strong>Reanalysis</strong> Project at COLA. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 76, 697–710.Parrish, D. F., and J. C. Derber, 1992: <strong>The</strong> <strong>National</strong> Meteorological Center’s spectralstatistical interpolation system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 1747-1763.Pegion K and B. Kirtman 2008: <strong>The</strong> Impact of Air-Sea Interactions on the Simulation ofTropical Intraseasonal Variability. J. <strong>Climate</strong> 24, 6616-6635.Peters-Lidard , C.D., P.R. Houser, Y. Tian, S.V. Kumar, J. Geiger, S. Olden, L. Lighty, B.Doty, P. Dirmeyer, J. Adams, K. Mitchell, E.F. Wood and J. Sheffield, 2007: High-- 78 -
performance Earth system modeling with NASA/GSFC's Land Information <strong>System</strong>.Innovations in <strong>System</strong>s and Software Engineering. Vol.3(3), 157-165.doi:10.1007/s11334-007-0028-x.Phillips, N. A., 1957: A coordinate system with some special advantages for numericalforecasting J. Atmos. Sci., 14, 184–185.Ponte, R. M., and R. D. Ray, 2002: Atmospheric pressure corrections in geodesy andoceanography: A strategy for handling air tides, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(24), 2153,doi:10.1029/2002GL016340.Purser, R. J., W.-S. Wu, D. F. Prrish, and N. M. Roberts, 2003a: Numerical aspects of theapplication of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis. Part I: Spatiallyhomogeneous and isotropic Gaussian covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1524-1535.Purser, R. J., W.-S. Wu, D. F. Prrish, and N. M. Roberts, 2003b: Numerical aspects of theapplication of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis. Part II: Spatiallyinhomogeneous and anisotropic general covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1536-1548.Rančić M., J. C. Derber, D. Parrish, R. Treadon, and D. T. Kleist, 2008: <strong>The</strong> developmentof the first-order time extrapolation to the observation (FOTO) method and itsapplication in the <strong>NCEP</strong> global data assimilation system. Proc. 12th Symp. onIntegrated Observing and Assimilation <strong>System</strong>s for the Atmosphere, Oceans, andLand Surface (IOAS-AOLS), New Orleans, LA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM,J6.1.Randall, D. A., 1980: Conditional instability of the first kind upside-down. J. Atmos. Sci,37, 125-130.Ray, R. D., and R. M. Ponte, 2003: Barometric tides from ECMWF operational analyses,Ann. Geophys., 21, 1897–1910.- 79 -
- Page 2 and 3:
ABSTRACTThe NCEP Climate Forecast S
- Page 4 and 5:
1. IntroductionThe first reanalysis
- Page 6 and 7:
In this paper we only discuss globa
- Page 8 and 9:
the reanalysis was halted to addres
- Page 10 and 11:
online archive of data for reanalys
- Page 12 and 13:
density MESONET data is included in
- Page 14 and 15:
The 1B datasets were calibrated usi
- Page 16 and 17:
MetOp is Europe's first polar-orbit
- Page 20 and 21:
The third GSI feature enabled in th
- Page 22 and 23:
the hydrostatic assumption. Soon af
- Page 24 and 25:
esolution with 28 sigma layers in t
- Page 26 and 27:
SW and LW radiations at one-hour in
- Page 28 and 29: SST data. The other uses AVHRR and
- Page 30 and 31: y Gent and McWilliams (1990; see al
- Page 32 and 33: from the Global Temperature-Salinit
- Page 34 and 35: through the end of the data set in
- Page 36 and 37: The passive microwave weather filte
- Page 39 and 40: from the sea ice/ocean back to the
- Page 41 and 42: weight is assigned to the gauge ana
- Page 43 and 44: Stream 6: 1 Jan 1994 to 31 Mar 1999
- Page 45 and 46: in the mid 1990’s, the period whe
- Page 47: e due to a change over the oceans (
- Page 52 and 53: In Figure 49, we show the temporal
- Page 54 and 55: distributed in time and space. Desp
- Page 56 and 57: forecast model at a lower resolutio
- Page 58 and 59: Appendix A: AcronymsAER Atmospheric
- Page 60 and 61: ONPCMDIPIRATAPROFLRQBOQuikSCATR1R2R
- Page 62 and 63: TMP2M 2m air temperature 24 / 473TM
- Page 64 and 65: Appendix C: The Data AccessTo addre
- Page 66 and 67: Figure 26 shows the global total bi
- Page 68 and 69: Argo Science Team, 2001: The global
- Page 70 and 71: Compo, G.P., J.S. Whitaker, and P.D
- Page 72 and 73: ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (O
- Page 75 and 76: Global Forecast System. Manuscript
- Page 77: and climate models. Atmos. Chem. Ph
- Page 81 and 82: with mesoscale numerical weather pr
- Page 83 and 84: experiments using SSM/I wind speed
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 21: Same as Figure 2, but fo
- Page 87 and 88: Figure 45: The fit of 6-hour foreca
- Page 89 and 90: Figure 1: Diagram illustrating CFSR
- Page 91 and 92: Figure 3: Same as in Figure 2, but
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 5: Same as in Figure 2, but
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 7: Same as in Figure 2, but
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 9: Same as in Figure 2, but
- Page 99 and 100: Figure 11: Same as in Figure 2, but
- Page 101 and 102: Figure 13: Same as in Figure 2, but
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 15: Radiance instruments on
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 17: Same as in Figure 16, bu
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 19: Global average Tb first
- Page 109 and 110: Figure 21: Same as in Figure 16, bu
- Page 111: Figure 23: Comparisons of the SSU b
- Page 114 and 115: Figure 26: The global total bias fo
- Page 116 and 117: Figure 28: The yearly total of trop
- Page 118 and 119: Figure 30: The vertical structure o
- Page 120 and 121: Figure 32: The global number of tem
- Page 122 and 123: Figure 34: The same as Figure 33, b
- Page 124 and 125: Figure 36: Monthly mean Sea ice ext
- Page 126 and 127: Figure 38: 2-meter volumetric soil
- Page 128 and 129:
Figure 40: Schematic of the executi
- Page 130 and 131:
Figure 42: Yearly averaged Southern
- Page 132 and 133:
Figure 44: Monthly mean hourly surf
- Page 134 and 135:
Figure 46: Global mean temperature
- Page 136 and 137:
Figure 48: Zonal mean total ozone d
- Page 138 and 139:
Figure 50: The subsurface temperatu
- Page 140 and 141:
Figure 52: Vertical profiles of the
- Page 142 and 143:
Figure 54: Zonal surface velocities
- Page 144 and 145:
ProgramPREVENTSACQCACAR_CQCCQCCQCVA
- Page 146:
Satellite Starting date Ending Date