12.07.2015 Views

English language version - Human Development Reports - United ...

English language version - Human Development Reports - United ...

English language version - Human Development Reports - United ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mozambique National <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Report 2007investment that, under normal circumstances,parental socialisation provides, such as education,care and love.The HDD 2003 showed a negative impact oforphanhood on school attendance: the ratio of theproportion of double orphans ages 10-14 attendingschool to the proportion of non-orphans (childrenliving with at lest one parent) of the same age groupattending school was 0.8 in 2003. The situation ofmaternal orphans is particularly worrying: this wasthe group with the lowest percentage (62%) schoolattendance. In general, the school attendance oforphans is improving: the school attendance rationwas 0.47 in 1997.Strengthening of communitylevel support systemsThe growing numbers of orphaned and vulnerablechildren, within a weakened economy, will continueto be faced with the fragility of community-level systemsof social cohesion and solidarity, which willincrease social marginalisation, or discrimination,and the unbridled struggle for economic survival. Tochange this scenario, there is every need to invest indefending the rights of these children and in the needfor a positive reaction from the community in orderto make viable a balanced growth and promotion oftheir welfare.However, so that this advocacy may becomesomething concrete, a clear vision and strategy onthe sharing of responsibilities, or on coordinatinginterventions between the state and civil society, isproving determinant.As regards the social responsibility fororphans, social expectations are divided. In oneperspective, the responsibility of the state is arguedas an imperative to minimise the risks these childrenrun of becoming street kids. This position isintimately linked to the promotion of communitycentres that shelter orphans, under the directadministration of the state (AIDS Analysis AfricaVol 6 no 1, 1996).The responsibility of the state is also seen as criticalsince it can help to avoid the trend towardsabuse of minors, or their exploitation as child labour,which is not uncommon in some social circles, makingpreferential victims of children in the direct careof foster families.Another perspective sees the need for actionsarising at the level of the extended family and of thecommunity, but coordinated with interventions andsupport that should come from the relevant stateinstitutions. The need to find ways to educate thesechildren inside the community is based on theadvantages this provides for their healthy growthwithin the standard of values applicable to otherchildren.This perspective rests on the assumption that thesocial insertion of orphaned and vulnerable childrenis above all one of the most efficient and effectiveways of avoiding the stigma that orphanages or sheltersmay create, regardless of the conditions theymay provide for these children.As one may understand, the discussion on thismatter attracts various opinions and they are notalways consensual. In any case, there exists a generalunderstanding of the importance of effective coordinationto ensure that orphaned and vulnerablechildren are not seen as “parasites” and undesirablesin the community.When the government emerges as the main actorand provider of social welfare for orphaned and vulnerablechildren, community tolerance for themproves difficult. Indeed, intervention undertakenthrough orphanages – with their countless financialdifficulties, which can lead to malnutrition and tolack of adequate socialization (and often to access toeducation) – have so far had limited success in theMozambican context.Hence sheltering orphaned and vulnerable childrenin the family and/or community context, in theabsence of systems with some tradition in this kind ofsocial service, remains the way to ensure balancedinsertion, as long as it is properly accompanied bythe supervisory bodies, and given material support.And where this shelter does not exist, there willalways be the risk of increasing the number of streetchildren, child prostitution, drug consumption andother kinds of child and juvenile delinquency, includingrobbery and violence.To avoid these predictable consequences andguarantee a balanced growth of the OVCs, it is necessaryto strengthen the coordination betweenstate institutions and community authorities, NGOsand community organizations in order to undertakea survey of these children, and provide documentationand basic care that can help them realizetheir citizenship rights, and ensure ever smallerchances of exposure and vulnerability to contractingHIV.38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!