PPDVP Evaluation Report - Pacific Prevention of Domestic Violence ...

agenda itelfifor the Forum Regional Security Committee; the Forum Leaders have identified sexualand genderbased violence as an element of human security and the Forum Secretariat has set up aReference Group on Sexual and Gender Based Violence. This regional awareness of domesticviolence is!ues, and the PCIP's endorsement of the PPDVP, will help maintain the impetus for incountrypo'ce services to continue to support and develop the changes made under the PPDVP.Quality IndicatorSustainlbilityExplanationThe PPDVP has built a solid foundation within each of the fiveparticipating countries, and there is a high level of support frommany police officers and other stakeholders. Refresher trainingand on-going monitoring of new procedures will be required tobuild the sustainability of galns made to date. Resourcing ofDVUs in small police forces may create challenges forsustainability. Changes beyond the PPDVP's control, such aschanges of Police Commissioner, may impact on thesustainability of the PPOVP's outcomes.Rating(1-6) .4Efficiency and Value for MoneySumrnory fromquestionnaires: Efficiency across five PPDVP Objectives[I] = 0; [2] = 2; [3] = 4; [4] = 17; [5] = 28; [6] = 17; DNK = 25; N/A = 0Ranki ng Scales:[I] =very low/poar. [Z] = poor; 131 = below average; 141 = above average; [5] =good; [6] =very hlgh/excellent.DNK = Do not kno~t: N/A = Not applicable11s. The PPDVPis a multi-country programme with five participating countries, plus limited activities in'linked' countries and with other Pacific police services6. Instead of each in-country programmebeing managed separately, the PPDVP has one implementation unit to support the work across allfive participating countries and the other multi-country activities. This is considered an effectiveway to manage and implement the programme.119. Resourcingand resource allocation appears to have been adequate to meet the POD and theBusiness Plans of the PPDVP, and there have been no apparent areas of duplication or unnecessaryexpenditure. Participation in the workshops in Southeast Asia and Nepal, while not directly relatedto the delivety of the PPOVP provided an opportunity to link with police training and capacitybuilding activities in other regions with the potential for bringing back new ideas and learnings toinform the PPDVP. In practice, it appears that the PPDVP is unique, and some other internationaland regional policing programmes have picked up the training curriculum developed by the PPDVP.120. The priorityobjective of the PPDVP has been to build the capacity of the police forces in the fiveparticipating countries. As far as can be ascertained from reports and participant responses, thecost of activities in the linked and other Pacific countries has not been at the expense of plannedactivities in the five participating countries. The regional component of the programme has notcome with financial or other resource costs which detracted from undertaking agreed work plan,and programme funds have been applied to the agreed work areas and not diverted to otheractivities. When the PPDVP extended support into Micronesia the initial needs analysis was coveredby a TAF grant; subsequent delivery of training, awareness raising, and establishment of DVUs wascarried out in a period when the main part of the programme was focussing on consolidation ofOblective 1: To Increase Pacific police capaclty across the region to prevent and respond effectively to domestic violenceand to developand malntaln partnerships at a regional levelPPDVP ~viluation Report Page 19