PPDVP Evaluation Report - Pacific Prevention of Domestic Violence ...

Effectiveness:5 What changes have you noticed in the way police respond to domestic violence, since thebeginning of the PPDVP?6 What were the key activities of the PPDVP which assisted your police service to respond todomestic violence issues?7 Please select one change in the way in which your police service responds to domesticviolence, and describe how the PPDVP contributed to this change8 What changes have you noticed, since the start of the PPDVP, in the relationship betweenpolice and other stakeholders involved with responding to domestic violence? To what extent didthe PPDVP contribute to these changes?9 To what extent do you think the PPDVP has achieved its objectives since 2005 in each area?Rating Scale:6:very hlgh/excellent; S=good; 4=above average; 3=below average; 2=poor; 1= very low/poor; DNK = DoNot Know; N/A = Not AppllcableT o Increase Pacific police capacity across the region to prevent andrespond effectively to domestic violence and to develop and maintain 1 2 3 4 5 6 DNK N/Apartnerships at a regional levelTo Increase police capacity to respond effectively to domestic violence inCook Islands, Tonga, Samoa, Kiribati and Vanuatu1 2 3 4 5 6ONKN/ATo develop and maintain effective partnerships between Police andrelevant Government Agencies, and NGOs, Churches, Community 1 2 3 4 5 6DNKN/AIeaders/Organisations to prevent/respond effectively to domesticvblence in the participating countries of Cook Islands, Tonga, Samoa,Kir~bati and VanuatuTo support the development of appropriate legislation on domesticvialence and training of the judiciary/legal profession in Samoa, Tonga, 1 2 3 4 5 6 DNK N/ACook Islands, Kiribati and VanuatuTosupport . . the development of appropriate national policy on domesticI violence and incorporation of appropriate actions in National 11 2Development Plans in Cook Islands, Tonga, Samoa, Kiribati and Vanuatu I3 4 5 6DNKN/AI10 Please rate the PPDVP's performance in the following areas:~ a tScale:6 ~I6=very high/excellent; 5=good; 4=above average; 3=below average; 2=poor; 1= very low/poor; DNK = DoNot Know; N/A = Not ApplicableHow responsive Is the programme to changlng needs wlthin the region or incountry?1 2 3 4 5 6DNKN/ATo what degree - daes the programme deliver what It prornlsed, on time?1 2 3 4 5 6DNKN/ATo what degree does the programme deliver what it promlsed, within budget?1 2 3 4 5 6DNKN/AHow well is the programme resourced in terms of fundlng and appropriate staff?How well are risks assoclated with the programme managed?PlanningBudgeting and financial managementProject monitoringReportingAny additional comments .......1 2 3 4 5 6DNKN/A1 2 3 4 5 6DNKN/A1 2 3 4 5 6DNKN/A1 2 3 4 5 6DNKN/A1 2 3 4 5 6DNKN/A1 2 3 4 5 6DNKN/APPDVP Evaluation ReportPage 52