PPDVP Evaluation Report - Pacific Prevention of Domestic Violence ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

'Slit New Zealand Aid Programme has provided funding to NZ Police (totalling NZSSmillion) toi mplement the PPDVP via a Memorandum of Understanding, which commenced on 1 July 2005 andi sending on 30 June 2011.NZ Police recently completed a baseline update survey in the Cook Islands, Kiribati, Samoa, andTcnga, and published the report in March 2011. Currently, NZ Police PPDVP is in the process ofpreparing an Activity Completion Report.Based on NZ Police's Baseline update survey report and further gap analysis work, the NZ AidProgramme and NZ Police have agreed to implement a small set of activities in FY 2011/12 toprovide follow up support to the participating countries.An evaluation at the end of this project will help to determine effectiveness of support to date andwhether a further phase of NZ Aid Programme support is necessary beyond FY 2011/12, and if so,scope, focus, and scale of support.An evaluation at the end of this project will help the NZ Aid Programme and NZ Police to determineeffectiveness of support to date and whether a further phase of support is necessary beyond FY2011/12, and if so, scope, focus, and scale of support.The findings of the evaluation may also be reported to the participating countries and the PlCP as abasis to make improvements as necessary to the effectiveness of the participating Pacific PoliceService's capacity in responding to domestic violence.PurposeTo provide an assessment of the relevance, effectiveness, value for money, efficiency, andsustainability of the Programme.To make recommendations on any priority areas for further assisting the Pacific Police Servicesincluding focus, scope, scale, resourcing and duration of further assistance.ScopeThe evaluation will assess programme progress from commencement in July 2005 to present. It willprimarily assess the achievement of the Programme's objectives at the national level in the 5participating countries and assess what has been achieved against the four DAC criteria relevance,effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability. It will also address whether the activity provided valuefor money, and potential savings through different design, methodology, and resource allocation.Exclusions: The evaluation will not consider impact as it is too early to assess programme impacts.The non-participating PlCs are largely excluded from the focus of this evaluation (apart from anassessment in relation to overall value for money) as the PPDVP has primarily focussed on 5participating PlCs and assessment of the other 14 PlCs would require a more expensive and timeconsuming evaluation.Objectives of the EvaluationObjective 1: Assess the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, value for money, and sustainability ofthe PPDVP.-FPDVP Evaluation Report Page 37
Relevance:2. Is the PPD'J'P and the outcomes it is trying to achieve relevant and aligned well with the mandate,policies, and priorities of the New Zealand Aid Programme?2. Is the PPDVP goal, objectives and outputs clearly focussed on partner needs, and priorities bothat a national level within the participating countries, and at a regional level?Effectiveness of the 5 country programmes:3. To what extent has each of the 5 country programmes met the primary objective 2 of the PPDVPdesign (to build the capacity of the PIC Police Service to respond effectively to domestic violence)?4. To what extent has each of the 5 country programmes met the other objectives 3-5 of the PPDVPdesign?5. Identify and make recommendations on any priority areas under objectives 2-5 for furtherassistance by NZ Police in any future phase of support.6. To what extent are the country governance structures for the country programmes appropriate?To what extent have they been effective? How could country governance structures for the countryprogrammes be made more effective?7. Make recommendations to reinforce and/or revise the country governance structures for thePPDVP country programmes for any follow-up phase.Sustainability of country programme outcomes:£3. Assess to what extent country programmes contributed to building a sustainable DV capacitywithin the Pacific police service. What strategies have been implemented by NZ Police to assistparticipating Police Services to address sustainability of training outcomes (give consideration to DVUnit capacity, staffing and changes of staff) under the country programmes?9. To what extent have the participating Pacific Police Management been effective in implementingstrategies to ensure the sustainability of capacity development outcomes (give consideration to DVUnit capacity and staffing and changes of staff) under the country programmes?Efficiency and value for money of the PPDVP (includes country programmes and regionalcomponent):10. Assess whether the activity provided value for money.11. Have the operations of the PPDVP (including NZ Police's quality assurance processes to monitorperformance against the MOU) been effective and efficient in ensuring its planning, delivery(intended outputs and outcomes), monitoring, analysis, and reporting" functions are completed ontime, to quality standards, and within budget?12. Are the role types within the PPDVP implementation unit appropriate and adequate? Makerecommendations to reinforce and/or revise resourcing for the PPDVP implementation (role typesand resourcing level) for any follow-up phase.l4 For instance, assess quality of reports: to what extent is reporting containing adequate analyses, evidencebasedand disaggregated data (eg for gender) on outputs and outcomes?PPDVP Evaluation Report Page 38
Page 1 and 2: Independent Evaluation ReportPacifi
Page 3 and 4: I(EXECuTIVE SUMMARYBackground1. The
Page 6 and 7: Cook Islands:18. Evidence from the
Page 8 and 9: In-Cduntry Governance Systemsso. Th
Page 11 and 12: ContentsWECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........
Page 13 and 14: to the effectiveness of the partici
Page 15 and 16: for studies on the economic and dev
Page 17 and 18: this point." Expectations in the PP
Page 19 and 20: the development of the national pol
Page 21 and 22: Samoa52. The PPDVP has played a men
Page 23 and 24: e reported because of extensive edu
Page 25 and 26: Summy from questionnaires:Effectrve
Page 27 and 28: some countries supporting NGOs to i
Page 29 and 30: 112. Police Commissioners have stat
Page 31 and 32: I-earning. The regional work has be
Page 33 and 34: 133. The PPDVP is considered, by a
Page 35 and 36: 1 inked countries, and with regiona
Page 37 and 38: to family violence and other forms
Page 39 and 40: Outline Desinn for Follow-up PhaseG
Page 41 and 42: @Innex One:Glossary of acronymsAFP
Page 43 and 44: Annex Three: Summary of Questionnai
Page 45 and 46: Annex Four:Goal & Objectives of the
Page 47: eport to the NZ Police contract man
Page 51 and 52: adviser. This will involve approval
Page 53 and 54: ComponentObjective1234To increase p
Page 55 and 56: Annex Six:Evaluation PlanBackground
Page 57 and 58: other Senior Police, Police Trainin
Page 59 and 60: The Screening Guide for Mainstreame
Page 61 and 62: Does your countv have a National Do
Page 63 and 64: Effectiveness:5 What changes have y
Page 65 and 66: violence in the participating count
Page 67 and 68: Lina ChangMaara TetavaManakovi Pahu

PPDVP Evaluation Report - Pacific Prevention of Domestic Violence ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?