PPDVP Evaluation Report - Pacific Prevention of Domestic Violence ...

13. Assess whether including a secondary focus of non-participating countries in the PPDVP (underobjective 1 of design) has provided (or has detracted from providing) value for money, and makerecommendations for whether NZ Police PPOVP support to any non-participating countries shouldcontinue in any future phase of support, and if so, to what extent and how NZ Police should addressany support to non-participating countries in any future phase of support (including scope, focus,and scale of support).Objective 2: Recommendations for further assistance (if any) including what form of assistance(focus, scope, scale, duration, and resaurcing) this should take? Provide a high-level design: goal,objectives, an'd outputs for any follow-up phase.14. Taking into consideration the above findings make recommendations to reinforce and/or revisethe PPDVP goal, objectives, and outputs (in relation to the 5 country programmes, and any nonparticipatingcountry component), duration, and resourcing for any follow-up phase.15. In making any recommendations for reinforcing and/or revision of design for any future phase ofsupport, also give specific consideration to whether NZ Police should extend the scope/focus of itsassistance and be the lead service provider on non-policing areas such as counselling for victims andoffenders, working with churches (or remain focussed on capacity development of its counterpartPIC Police Agency, with other A/NZ or Pacific providers such as RRRT, MSD, FWCC taking the lead onnon-policing SGBV areas)?- -MethodologyIThe contractor(s) must undertake an evidence-based approach to all stages of the evaluation anddata, analysis, and findings, conclusions and recommendations must be demonstrably evidencebased(both quantitative and qualitative) and triangulated and presented in a clear and transparentmanner. The evaluation methodology and approach should be set out in detail in the evaluationplan. The contractor(s) will submit an evaluation plan to MFAT for approvali5 prior tocommencement of the evaluation.Consideration should be given to the New Zealand Aid Programme's mainstreamed and cross-cuttingissues, including human rights, gender equality, and conflict prevention and peace building. Theevaluation will use a consultative approach and must be conducted in a professional and ethicalmanner and comply with the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Evaluation QualityStandards.The evaluation will not involve travel to the Pacific. It will incorporate a desk review, face-to-faceinterviews with Wellington-based stakeholders, and telephone interviews with stakeholders outsideWellington.The evaluation plan, questionnaires (if any), checklists of questions and a summary of survey resultsshould be appended to the evaluation report.Management and Governance of the PPDVP EvaluationMFAT is commissioning an evaluation of the PPDVP. Coordination and governance of this evaluationwill be undertaken through the Regional Growth and Governance team assisted by an evaluation- ~l5 Some examples of questions that the evaluator(s) should answer in their evaluation plan are set out inAnnex 1.PPDVP Evaluation Report Page 39