PPDVP Evaluation Report - Pacific Prevention of Domestic Violence ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

agenda itelfifor the Forum Regional Security Committee; the Forum Leaders have identified sexualand genderbased violence as an element of human security and the Forum Secretariat has set up aReference Group on Sexual and Gender Based Violence. This regional awareness of domesticviolence is!ues, and the PCIP's endorsement of the PPDVP, will help maintain the impetus for incountrypo'ce services to continue to support and develop the changes made under the PPDVP.Quality IndicatorSustainlbilityExplanationThe PPDVP has built a solid foundation within each of the fiveparticipating countries, and there is a high level of support frommany police officers and other stakeholders. Refresher trainingand on-going monitoring of new procedures will be required tobuild the sustainability of galns made to date. Resourcing ofDVUs in small police forces may create challenges forsustainability. Changes beyond the PPDVP's control, such aschanges of Police Commissioner, may impact on thesustainability of the PPOVP's outcomes.Rating(1-6) .4Efficiency and Value for MoneySumrnory fromquestionnaires: Efficiency across five PPDVP Objectives[I] = 0; [2] = 2; [3] = 4; [4] = 17; [5] = 28; [6] = 17; DNK = 25; N/A = 0Ranki ng Scales:[I] =very low/poar. [Z] = poor; 131 = below average; 141 = above average; [5] =good; [6] =very hlgh/excellent.DNK = Do not kno~t: N/A = Not applicable11s. The PPDVPis a multi-country programme with five participating countries, plus limited activities in'linked' countries and with other Pacific police services6. Instead of each in-country programmebeing managed separately, the PPDVP has one implementation unit to support the work across allfive participating countries and the other multi-country activities. This is considered an effectiveway to manage and implement the programme.119. Resourcingand resource allocation appears to have been adequate to meet the POD and theBusiness Plans of the PPDVP, and there have been no apparent areas of duplication or unnecessaryexpenditure. Participation in the workshops in Southeast Asia and Nepal, while not directly relatedto the delivety of the PPOVP provided an opportunity to link with police training and capacitybuilding activities in other regions with the potential for bringing back new ideas and learnings toinform the PPDVP. In practice, it appears that the PPDVP is unique, and some other internationaland regional policing programmes have picked up the training curriculum developed by the PPDVP.120. The priorityobjective of the PPDVP has been to build the capacity of the police forces in the fiveparticipating countries. As far as can be ascertained from reports and participant responses, thecost of activities in the linked and other Pacific countries has not been at the expense of plannedactivities in the five participating countries. The regional component of the programme has notcome with financial or other resource costs which detracted from undertaking agreed work plan,and programme funds have been applied to the agreed work areas and not diverted to otheractivities. When the PPDVP extended support into Micronesia the initial needs analysis was coveredby a TAF grant; subsequent delivery of training, awareness raising, and establishment of DVUs wascarried out in a period when the main part of the programme was focussing on consolidation ofOblective 1: To Increase Pacific police capaclty across the region to prevent and respond effectively to domestic violenceand to developand malntaln partnerships at a regional levelPPDVP ~viluation Report Page 19
I-earning. The regional work has been undertaken primarily by the Programme Officer and has noti mpacted on the work plans of any of the mentors or the Programme Manager.121. Budget costs seem appropriate to the Objectives and to the Annual Business Plans, and the PPDVPh a s delivered the services and tasks it has been funded to provide. Personnel and management costsofthe PPDVP appear to compare favourably with costs for regional programmes managed andimplemented by Management Services Contractors. The investment per country has been relativelyI aw in terms of the outcomes achieved from a very low base. It is important that the value formoney demonstrated to-date is maximised by sufficient on-going support to build the sustainabilityofoutcomes. To allow the impetus and gains to be lost would not be value for money in the longerterm.comparison of personnel and operating costs7Year I TotolSpend [ Personnel ( % of Spend loperating Costs I % of Spend 12005 - 062006 - 072007 - 082008 - 092009 - 102010 - 11000s223.97973.68993.60998.991000.001285.20000s101.02262.82246.10282.39295.90298.80on personnel45.10%26.99%24.77%28.27%29.59%23.25%000s122.96710.86747.50716.60704.10986.40operuting costs54.97%73.01 %73.23%71.73%70.41%76.754%Linked I I I !Countries UBTOfAL 1 29.72 1 5.83% 1 39.65 1 5.76% 1 34.51. FundingMechanismsSUBTOTALTOTAL79.60509.5415.62%54.77688.887.95% 60.76564.2510.77%127. The value of regional activities (such as training workshops and development of resources: commonunderstandings and consistent approach across Pacific, and the chance to share learning andexperiences) was noted by several respondents. It was also noted that it is cost effective to produceone resource/template for adapting in several countries rather than developing individual resourcesfrom scratch in each country.128. Recommendations for secondarv focus on non-'participating countries' in any future phase ofsupport:The PlCP has a declaration of Partnership with the PPDVP, which raises expectations in thePacific that some level of support will be available. This should be acknowledged, and somelevel of support provided within the resourcing constraints of the programme.The PPDVP web-site provides Pacific and other countries with access to resources such astraining curriculum and templates for policy, strategies and operating procedures. It is also aforum for sharing information, experiences and advice. The website could be developed and' Based on expenditure information provided by NZ PoliceBased on expenditure information provided by NZ Police-PPDVP Evaluation Report Page 20
Page 1 and 2: Independent Evaluation ReportPacifi
Page 3 and 4: I(EXECuTIVE SUMMARYBackground1. The
Page 6 and 7: Cook Islands:18. Evidence from the
Page 8 and 9: In-Cduntry Governance Systemsso. Th
Page 11 and 12: ContentsWECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........
Page 13 and 14: to the effectiveness of the partici
Page 15 and 16: for studies on the economic and dev
Page 17 and 18: this point." Expectations in the PP
Page 19 and 20: the development of the national pol
Page 21 and 22: Samoa52. The PPDVP has played a men
Page 23 and 24: e reported because of extensive edu
Page 25 and 26: Summy from questionnaires:Effectrve
Page 27 and 28: some countries supporting NGOs to i
Page 29: 112. Police Commissioners have stat
Page 33 and 34: 133. The PPDVP is considered, by a
Page 35 and 36: 1 inked countries, and with regiona
Page 37 and 38: to family violence and other forms
Page 39 and 40: Outline Desinn for Follow-up PhaseG
Page 41 and 42: @Innex One:Glossary of acronymsAFP
Page 43 and 44: Annex Three: Summary of Questionnai
Page 45 and 46: Annex Four:Goal & Objectives of the
Page 47 and 48: eport to the NZ Police contract man
Page 49 and 50: Relevance:2. Is the PPD'J'P and the
Page 51 and 52: adviser. This will involve approval
Page 53 and 54: ComponentObjective1234To increase p
Page 55 and 56: Annex Six:Evaluation PlanBackground
Page 57 and 58: other Senior Police, Police Trainin
Page 59 and 60: The Screening Guide for Mainstreame
Page 61 and 62: Does your countv have a National Do
Page 63 and 64: Effectiveness:5 What changes have y
Page 65 and 66: violence in the participating count
Page 67 and 68: Lina ChangMaara TetavaManakovi Pahu

PPDVP Evaluation Report - Pacific Prevention of Domestic Violence ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?