12.07.2015 Views

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) - the City of Lompoc!

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) - the City of Lompoc!

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) - the City of Lompoc!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Order2. There were no feasible alternatives to bypass, such as <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong>auxiliary treatment facilities, retention <strong>of</strong> untreated waste, ormaintenance during normal periods <strong>of</strong> equipment downtime. Thiscondition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should havebeen installed in <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> reasonable engineering judgment toprevent a bypass that could occur during normal periods <strong>of</strong> equipmentdowntime or preventative maintenance;3. The discharger submitted a notice at least ten days in advance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>need for a bypass to <strong>the</strong> Regional <strong>Water</strong> Board; or4. The discharger may allow a bypass to occur that does not causeeffluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it is for essentialmaintenance to assure efficient operation. In such a case, <strong>the</strong> abovebypass conditions are not applicable. The discharger shall submitnotice <strong>of</strong> an unanticipated bypass as required.M. Upset1. A discharger that wishes to establish <strong>the</strong> affirmative defense <strong>of</strong> anupset 10 in an action brought for noncompliance shall demonstrate,through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or o<strong>the</strong>rrelevant evidence that:a. An upset occurred and that <strong>the</strong> discharger can identify <strong>the</strong> cause(s)<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> upsetb. The treatment facility was being properly operated by <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> upsetc. The discharger submitted notice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> upset as required; andd. The discharger complied with any remedial measures required2. No determination made before an action <strong>of</strong> noncompliance occurs,such as during administrative review <strong>of</strong> claims that noncompliance wascaused by an upset, is final administrative action subject to judicialreview.3. In any enforcement proceeding, <strong>the</strong> discharger seeking to establish <strong>the</strong>occurrence <strong>of</strong> an upset has <strong>the</strong> burden <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>10 An exceptional incident in which <strong>the</strong>re is unintentional and temporary noncompliance <strong>the</strong> technologybased numeric effluent limitations because <strong>of</strong> factors beyond <strong>the</strong> reasonable control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> discharger. Anupset does not include noncompliance to <strong>the</strong> extent caused by operational error, improperly designedtreatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack <strong>of</strong> preventative maintenance, or careless or improperoperation.2009-0009-DWQ 26 September 02, 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!