A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

InterventioncategoryExercise -constructionExercise -workplaceExercise,ergonomicTrainingHearingprotectorsAuthor, year Country Industry/Sector Job titles Sample size Loss tofollow-upLudewig, US Construction Journeymen I 1 n=34, C 1 I 1 n=4, C 12003n=32, C 2 n=25 n=1, C 2 n=2Sjogren, 2006 Finland Departments in Office workers I 1 n=21, IC 1 I 1 n=2, IC 1city centraln=15n=1administrationDehlin, 1981 Sweden Geriatric Hospital Nursing aides I 1 n=15, I 2n=14, C n=16Erlandsson,1980SwedenShipyard(assembly andboiler shop)Loss control Nave, 2004 US Small andMediumCompaniesNPNot relevant - based onemployersNew office Nelson, 1998 US Office Clerical, administrative,and professionalsupportParticipatoryergonomics -mfgPolicy(employerlevel)Policy(employerlevel)I 1 n=30, Cn=20I 1 n=82, Cn=45I 1 targetn=1616,matchedn=577, Ctarget n=187,matched n=55Laing, 2005 Canada Automotive Mfg NP I 1 n=44, Cn=39Rosenblum,2006USDrywalldistributorWassell, 2000 US Combinationsupermarket andmerchandiseDriver, helper andcombination ofdriver/helperReceiver, unloader,stocker, departmentmanagerI 1 n=503, Cn=1423I 1 n=5178, Cn=4180I 1 n=2, I 2 n=3,C n=1NPI 1 n=0, C n=0I 1 n=682NPNPI 1 n=1770, Cn=1292Length ofobservation4 weeks15 weeksNP3 years18 months12 months10 months33 months6.5 monthsPrograms(regulatory)Programs(regulatory)Mancini, 2005 Italy Factories Metal workers,construction workers,and ceramic/woodworkersNP NP 15 yearsBell, 2006 US Timber Fellers, etc. I 1 n=36 (4 NP4 yearsyrs), C n=NP98 Institute for Work & Health
InterventioncategoryPrograms(regulatory)Programs(regulatory)Programs(regulatory),Policy(employerlevel)Author, year Country Industry/Sector Job titles Sample size Loss tofollow-upLength ofobservationFeinauer, 1993 US Wisconsin - NP NP NP NPbusiness that payworkers comp.Nelson, 1997 US Construction Multi - industrial, I 1 n=784, C NP5 yearsemployers construction, service n=8301Hager, 1982 US Western ElectricNP10 yearsWorksRTW/DM Durand, 2001 Canada University hospitalbased workrehabilitationfacilityRTW/DM Loisel, 2002 Canada Manufacturing,services,healthcareRTW/DM Jensen, 2005 Denmark Elder care wardsin home care,sheltered housing& nursing homesRTW/DM Staal, 2004(and Hlobil,2005)(for intervention groupjobs not specified)control group = stockclerks, shipping &receiving clerks,forklift driversMultiI 1 n=24, I 2n=22, I 3 =NP,I 4 =37, C n=24I 1 n=28,C 1 =49, C 2 =49,C 3 =21Multi I 1 n=31, I 2n=22, I 3 n=25,C n=26Homecare workers,nurses, nurses' aidsNetherlands Airport Passenger services,engineering andmaintenance, cargo,cabin, cockpit, etc.I 1 n=54, I 2n=49, I 3 n=63,C n= 97I 1 n=67, Cn=67I 1 =NP, C 1n=15, C 2 n=0,C 3 n=3NPI 1 n=68, I 2n=45, I 3 n=48,C n=0I 1 n=3, C=NP16 months6.4 years3 years6 monthsRTW/DM Arnetz, 2003 Sweden Multi Blue collar & whitecollarI 1 n=65, Cn=72NP12 monthsRTW/DMGreenwood,1990USUnderground coalminingNP I 1 n=121claims to 117workers, Cn=163 claimsfor 161workersNP18 monthsA systematic review of injury and illness prevention and loss control programs (IPCs)99
Page 1 and 2:
A systematic review of injury/illne
Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsForeword ………
Page 5 and 6:
ForewordIn recent years, the Instit
Page 7 and 8:
employers with valuable information
Page 9 and 10:
forward. In 1970, the Occupational
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 1: IPC frameworkInput(to wor
Page 13 and 14:
publish the results of the review i
Page 15 and 16:
A key part of the literature would
Page 17 and 18:
2.4 Level 2 - Quality AssessmentIn
Page 19 and 20:
allowed us to insure the answers pr
Page 21 and 22:
Table 4: Best evidence synthesis gu
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 3: Flowchart of systematic r
Page 25 and 26:
• Return-to-work/disability manag
Page 27 and 28:
etween groups, but only 32% adjuste
Page 29 and 30:
Workstationadjustment andtrainingRo
Page 31 and 32:
focused on just RTW (Durand et al.
Page 33 and 34:
ExerciseThree medium quality studie
Page 35 and 36:
compensation and medical bills is m
Page 37 and 38:
interventions provide an insufficie
Page 39 and 40:
Researchers and practitioners also
Page 41 and 42:
5.0 MessagesBefore making recommend
Page 43 and 44:
1) Of the articles that remained af
Page 45 and 46:
11) Agency for Healthcare Research
Page 47 and 48:
Carayon P, Haims MC, Hoonakker PLT,
Page 49 and 50: workers: Randomized controlled work
Page 51 and 52: Nelson NA, Silverstein BA. Workplac
Page 53 and 54: pain in sedentary office workers -
Page 55 and 56: Appendix A: Content expertsNameBarb
Page 57 and 58: Appendix C: Stakeholder search term
Page 59 and 60: Appendix D - Literature search term
Page 61 and 62: A systematic review of injury and i
Page 63 and 64: Zohar DZohar D,Modifying Supervisor
Page 65 and 66: Level 1 Guide for ReviewersThe guid
Page 67 and 68: Appendix G: Quality Appraisal Revie
Page 69 and 70: Q4. Were time-based comparisons use
Page 71 and 72: If there are no major significant d
Page 73 and 74: Q17. Was the calendar duration of t
Page 75 and 76: a) YesBaseline differences were obs
Page 77 and 78: 5. List the jurisdiction where the
Page 79 and 80: have intended to prevent both “as
Page 81 and 82: Sample SizeEg: C 1 , C 2 , …(or I
Page 83 and 84: 29. If injury rates were calculated
Page 85 and 86: 38. Describe for each injury/illnes
Page 87 and 88: Appendix J: Quality assessment tabl
Page 89 and 90: StudyTime-Based ComparisonsRandom A
Page 91 and 92: Appendix K: Intervention descriptio
Page 93 and 94: InterventionCategoryErgonomictraini
Page 95 and 96: InterventionCategoryBricklayingmeth
Page 97 and 98: InterventionCategoryTraining &equip
Page 99: Appendix L: Study description*key t
Page 103 and 104: InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
Page 105 and 106: InterventioncategoryErgonomictraini
Page 107 and 108: InterventioncategoryAuthor, Year QA
Page 109: InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
show all

A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?