A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

InterventionCategoryTraining -manualliftingParticipatoryergonomics -MfgArm supports- officeSkin caretraining - HCRTW/DMAuthor,YearJensen,2006Laing,2005Lintula,2001Loffler,2006Loisel,2002QA* Study Design PreventionTypeH non-randomized Bothfield trialMMMMrandomized fieldtrialrandomized fieldtrialrandomized fieldtrialrandomized fieldtrialPrimaryBothSecondaryBothIntervention DescriptionI 1 : combination of practical classroom education & instruction at worksiteconcerning lifting.I 2 : SMI addressed work stress in health care through training with group sessions.C: lessons of own choice in matters unrelated to intervention programs.I 1 : participatory ergonomics.C: received no intervention.I 1 : received one Ergorest arm support with a mouse pad for the hand that operatedthe mouse.I 2 : received Ergorest arm supports for both hands and a mouse pad for the mousinghand.C: received no arm supports and was instructed not to change their workstationsduring the study period.I 1 : skin care training (skin protective measures, use of emollients, hand washing,and hand disinfection).C: received no intervention.I 1 : clinical intervention (clinical examination by a back pain specialist, participationin a back school after eight weeks of absence from regular work, and if necessary, amulti-disciplinary work rehabilitation intervention after 12 weeks of absence fromwork).I 2 : occupational intervention (visits to occupational medicine physician and aparticipatory ergonomics).I 3 : Sherbrooke model intervention (combination of I 1 and I 2 ).C: standard care.Exercise -constructionLudewig,2003Mnon-randomizedfield trialBothI 1 : home exercise program.C 1 : symptomatic subjects control group.C 2 : asymptomatic subjects control group.92 Institute for Work & Health
InterventionCategoryBricklayingmethodPrograms(regulatory)Workstationadjustment &ergonomictraining -officeWorkstationadjustment &ergonomictraining -officeLoss controlPrograms(regulatory)New officeErgonomictraining -officeAuthor,YearLuijsterburg, 2005Mancini,2005Martin,2003 (andGatty,2004)May,2004Nave,2004Nelson,1997Nelson,1998Peper,2004QA* Study Design PreventionTypeM non-randomized Bothfield trialMHrandomized fieldtrialnon-randomizedfield trialPrimaryBothIntervention DescriptionI 1 : raised bricklaying.C: not raised bricklaying.I 1 : multi-component eye injury prevention program in metal industry.C 1 : no intervention construction workers.C 2 : no intervention wood/ceramic workersI 1 : received individualized training for 1 h per week for 4 weeks in body mechanics,workstation adjustments, task modification and stretches.C: received no interventionM other Both I 1 : workshop instruction and office ergonomic enhancements.MMMMnon-randomizedfield trialnon-randomizedfield trialrandomized fieldtrialnon-randomizedfield trialBothBothBothBothC: received no interventionI 1: flexible loss control strategyC: received no interventionI 1: regulatory inspection for fall protectionC: received no inspectionI 1 : employees moved from old buildings to a new building with new lighting andequipment and received 1 h of ergonomic training.C: continued working in old buildings. Supervisors received ergonomic training.I 1 : received training of 6 weekly 2 h group sessions in ergonomic principles,psychophysiological awareness and control, sEMG practice at the workstation.C: received no intervention.A systematic review of injury and illness prevention and loss control programs (IPCs)93
Page 1 and 2:
A systematic review of injury/illne
Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsForeword ………
Page 5 and 6:
ForewordIn recent years, the Instit
Page 7 and 8:
employers with valuable information
Page 9 and 10:
forward. In 1970, the Occupational
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 1: IPC frameworkInput(to wor
Page 13 and 14:
publish the results of the review i
Page 15 and 16:
A key part of the literature would
Page 17 and 18:
2.4 Level 2 - Quality AssessmentIn
Page 19 and 20:
allowed us to insure the answers pr
Page 21 and 22:
Table 4: Best evidence synthesis gu
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 3: Flowchart of systematic r
Page 25 and 26:
• Return-to-work/disability manag
Page 27 and 28:
etween groups, but only 32% adjuste
Page 29 and 30:
Workstationadjustment andtrainingRo
Page 31 and 32:
focused on just RTW (Durand et al.
Page 33 and 34:
ExerciseThree medium quality studie
Page 35 and 36:
compensation and medical bills is m
Page 37 and 38:
interventions provide an insufficie
Page 39 and 40:
Researchers and practitioners also
Page 41 and 42:
5.0 MessagesBefore making recommend
Page 43 and 44: 1) Of the articles that remained af
Page 45 and 46: 11) Agency for Healthcare Research
Page 47 and 48: Carayon P, Haims MC, Hoonakker PLT,
Page 49 and 50: workers: Randomized controlled work
Page 51 and 52: Nelson NA, Silverstein BA. Workplac
Page 53 and 54: pain in sedentary office workers -
Page 55 and 56: Appendix A: Content expertsNameBarb
Page 57 and 58: Appendix C: Stakeholder search term
Page 59 and 60: Appendix D - Literature search term
Page 61 and 62: A systematic review of injury and i
Page 63 and 64: Zohar DZohar D,Modifying Supervisor
Page 65 and 66: Level 1 Guide for ReviewersThe guid
Page 67 and 68: Appendix G: Quality Appraisal Revie
Page 69 and 70: Q4. Were time-based comparisons use
Page 71 and 72: If there are no major significant d
Page 73 and 74: Q17. Was the calendar duration of t
Page 75 and 76: a) YesBaseline differences were obs
Page 77 and 78: 5. List the jurisdiction where the
Page 79 and 80: have intended to prevent both “as
Page 81 and 82: Sample SizeEg: C 1 , C 2 , …(or I
Page 83 and 84: 29. If injury rates were calculated
Page 85 and 86: 38. Describe for each injury/illnes
Page 87 and 88: Appendix J: Quality assessment tabl
Page 89 and 90: StudyTime-Based ComparisonsRandom A
Page 91 and 92: Appendix K: Intervention descriptio
Page 93: InterventionCategoryErgonomictraini
Page 97 and 98: InterventionCategoryTraining &equip
Page 99 and 100: Appendix L: Study description*key t
Page 101 and 102: InterventioncategoryPrograms(regula
Page 103 and 104: InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
Page 105 and 106: InterventioncategoryErgonomictraini
Page 107 and 108: InterventioncategoryAuthor, Year QA
Page 109: InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
show all

A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?