A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Feinauer DM, Havlovic SJ. Drug testing as a strategy to reduce occupationalaccidents: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Safety Research. 1993; 24(1): 1– 7.Feuerstein M, Callan-Harris S, Hickey P, Dyer D, Armbruster W, CarosellaAM. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation of chronic work-related upper extremitydisorders. Long-term effects. Journal of Occupational Medicine. 1993; 35(4):396 – 403.Gerr F, Marcus M, Monteilh C, Hannan L, Ortiz D, Kleinbaum D. Arandomized controlled trial of postural interventions for prevention ofmusculoskeletal symptoms among computer users. Occupational &Environmental Medicine. 2005; 62: 478 – 487.Greene BL, DeJoy DM, Olejnik S. Effects of an active ergonomics trainingprogram on risk exposure, worker beliefs, and symptoms in computer users.WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation. 2005; 24(1):41 – 52.Greenwood JG, Wolf HJ, Pearson RJ, Woon CL, Posey P, Main CF. Earlyintervention in low back disability among coal miners in West Virginia:Negative findings. Journal of Occupational Medicine. 1990; 32(10): 1047 –1052.Gundewall B, Liljeqvist M, Hansson T. Primary prevention of backsymptoms and absence from work. A prospective randomized study amonghospital employees. Spine. 1993; 18(5): 587 – 594.Hager WL, Hoyle ER, Hermann ER. Efficacy of enforcement in an industrialhearing conservation program, American Industrial Hygiene AssociationJournal. 1982; 43(6): 455 – 465.Hlobil H, Staal JB, Twisk J, Koke A, Ariens G, Smid T, van Mechelen W.The effects of a graded activity intervention for low back pain in occupationalhealth on sick leave, functional status and pain: 12-month results of arandomized controlled trial. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2005;15(4): 569 – 580.Jensen IB, Bergstrom G, Ljungquist T, Bodin L. A 3-year follow-up of amultidisciplinary rehabilitation programme for back and neck pain. Pain.2005; 115(3): 273 – 283.Jensen LD, Gonge H, Jors E, Ryom P, Foldspang A, Christensen M,Vesterdorf A, Bonde JP. Prevention of low back pain in female eldercare46 Institute for Work & Health
workers: Randomized controlled work site trial. Spine. 2006; 31(16): 1761 –1769.Laing AC, Frazer MB, Cole DC, Kerr MS, Wells RP, Norman RW. Study ofthe effectiveness of a participatory ergonomics intervention in reducingworker pain severity through physical exposure pathways. Ergonomics. 2005;48(2): 150 – 170.Lintula M, Nevala-Puranen N, Louhevaara V. Effects of Ergorest armsupports on muscle strain and wrist positions during the use of the mouse andkeyboard in work with visual display units: A work site intervention.International Journal of Occupational Safety & Ergonomics. 2001; 7(1): 103– 116.Loffler H, Bruckner T, Diepgen T, Effendy I. Primary prevention in healthcare employees: A prospective intervention study with a 3-year trainingperiod. Contact Dermatitis. 2006; 54(4): 202 – 209.Loisel P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, Durand MJ, Champagne F, Stock S, Diallo B,Tremblay C. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disabilityprevention model for back pain management: A six year follow up study.Occupational & Environmental Medicine. 2002; 59(12): 807 – 815.Ludewig PM, Borstad JD. Effects of a home exercise programme on shoulderpain and functional status in construction workers. Occupational andEnvironmental Medicine. 2003; 60(11): 841 – 849.Luijsterburg PAJ, Bongers PM, de Vroome EMM. A new bricklayers' methodfor use in the construction industry. Scandinavian Journal of Work,Environment & Health. 2005; 31(5): 394 – 400.Lynch RM, Freund A. Short-term efficacy of back injury intervention projectfor patient care providers at one hospital, American Industrial HygieneAssociation Journal. 2000; 61(2): 290 – 294.McCluskey S, Burton AK, Main CJ. The implementation of occupationalhealth guidelines principles for reducing sickness absence due tomusculoskeletal disorders. Occupational Medicine (Oxford). 2006; 56(4): 237– 242.Mancini G, Baldasseroni A, Laffi G, Curti S, Mattioli S, Violante FS.Prevention of work related eye injuries: Long term assessment of theeffectiveness of a multicomponent intervention among metal workers.Occupational & Environmental Medicine. 2005; 62(12): 830 – 835.A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss controlprograms (IPCs)47
Page 1 and 2: A systematic review of injury/illne
Page 3 and 4: Table of ContentsForeword ………
Page 5 and 6: ForewordIn recent years, the Instit
Page 7 and 8: employers with valuable information
Page 9 and 10: forward. In 1970, the Occupational
Page 11 and 12: Figure 1: IPC frameworkInput(to wor
Page 13 and 14: publish the results of the review i
Page 15 and 16: A key part of the literature would
Page 17 and 18: 2.4 Level 2 - Quality AssessmentIn
Page 19 and 20: allowed us to insure the answers pr
Page 21 and 22: Table 4: Best evidence synthesis gu
Page 23 and 24: Figure 3: Flowchart of systematic r
Page 25 and 26: • Return-to-work/disability manag
Page 27 and 28: etween groups, but only 32% adjuste
Page 29 and 30: Workstationadjustment andtrainingRo
Page 31 and 32: focused on just RTW (Durand et al.
Page 33 and 34: ExerciseThree medium quality studie
Page 35 and 36: compensation and medical bills is m
Page 37 and 38: interventions provide an insufficie
Page 39 and 40: Researchers and practitioners also
Page 41 and 42: 5.0 MessagesBefore making recommend
Page 43 and 44: 1) Of the articles that remained af
Page 45 and 46: 11) Agency for Healthcare Research
Page 47: Carayon P, Haims MC, Hoonakker PLT,
Page 51 and 52: Nelson NA, Silverstein BA. Workplac
Page 53 and 54: pain in sedentary office workers -
Page 55 and 56: Appendix A: Content expertsNameBarb
Page 57 and 58: Appendix C: Stakeholder search term
Page 59 and 60: Appendix D - Literature search term
Page 61 and 62: A systematic review of injury and i
Page 63 and 64: Zohar DZohar D,Modifying Supervisor
Page 65 and 66: Level 1 Guide for ReviewersThe guid
Page 67 and 68: Appendix G: Quality Appraisal Revie
Page 69 and 70: Q4. Were time-based comparisons use
Page 71 and 72: If there are no major significant d
Page 73 and 74: Q17. Was the calendar duration of t
Page 75 and 76: a) YesBaseline differences were obs
Page 77 and 78: 5. List the jurisdiction where the
Page 79 and 80: have intended to prevent both “as
Page 81 and 82: Sample SizeEg: C 1 , C 2 , …(or I
Page 83 and 84: 29. If injury rates were calculated
Page 85 and 86: 38. Describe for each injury/illnes
Page 87 and 88: Appendix J: Quality assessment tabl
Page 89 and 90: StudyTime-Based ComparisonsRandom A
Page 91 and 92: Appendix K: Intervention descriptio
Page 93 and 94: InterventionCategoryErgonomictraini
Page 95 and 96: InterventionCategoryBricklayingmeth
Page 97 and 98: InterventionCategoryTraining &equip
Page 99 and 100:
Appendix L: Study description*key t
Page 101 and 102:
InterventioncategoryPrograms(regula
Page 103 and 104:
InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
Page 105 and 106:
InterventioncategoryErgonomictraini
Page 107 and 108:
InterventioncategoryAuthor, Year QA
Page 109:
InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
show all

A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?