A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

7.0 References used in quality assessment and evidencesynthesisAaras A, Horgen G, Bjorset HH, Ro O, Walsoe H. Musculoskeletal, visualand psychosocial stress in VDU operators before and after multidisciplinaryergonomic interventions. A 6 years prospective study - Part II. AppliedErgonomics. 2001; 32(6): 559 – 571.Adera T, Amir C, Anderson L. Use of comparison populations for evaluatingthe effectiveness of hearing loss prevention programs. American IndustrialHygiene Association Journal. 2000; 61(1): 11 – 15.Amick BC III, Robertson MM, DeRango K, Bazzani L, Moore A, Rooney T,Harrist R. Effect of office ergonomics intervention on reducingmusculoskeletal symptoms. Spine. 2003; 28(24): 2706 – 2711.Arnetz BB, Sjogren B, Rydehn B, Meisel R. Early workplace intervention foremployees with musculoskeletal-related absenteeism: A prospectivecontrolled intervention study. Journal of Occupational & EnvironmentalMedicine. 2003; 45(5): 499 – 506.Baggs J, Silverstein B, Foley M. Workplace health and safety regulations:Impact of enforcement and consultation on workers' compensation claimsrates in Washington State. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2003;43(5): 483 – 494.Bell, JL and Grushecky, ST. Evaluating the effectiveness of a logger safetytraining program. Journal of Safety Research. 2006; 37(1): 53 – 61.Bohr, PC. Efficacy of office ergonomics education. Journal of OccupationalRehabilitation. 200; 10(4): 243 – 255.Secondary Reference: Bohr, PC. Office ergonomics education: A comparisonof traditional and participatory methods. WORK: A Journal of Prevention,Assessment & Rehabilitation. 2002; 19(2): 185 – 191.Brisson C, Montreuil S, Punnett L. Effects of an ergonomic training programon workers with video display units, Scandinavian Journal of Work,Environment & Health. 1999; 25(3): 255 – 263.Brown KC, Sirles AT, Hilyer JC, Thomas MJ. Cost-effectiveness of a backschool intervention for municipal employees. Spine. 1992; 17(10): 1224 –1228.44 Institute for Work & Health
Carayon P, Haims MC, Hoonakker PLT, Swanson NG. Teamwork andmusculoskeletal health in the context of work organization interventions inoffice and computer work. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2006;7(1): 39 – 69.Carrivick PJ, Lee AH, Yau KK. Effectiveness of a workplace risk assessmentteam in reducing the rate, cost, and duration of occupational injury. Journal ofOccupational & Environmental Medicine. 2002; 44(2): 155 – 159.Carrivick PJ, Lee AH, Yau KK. Consultative team to assess manual handlingand reduce the risk of occupational injury. Occupational & EnvironmentalMedicine. 2001; 58(5): 339 – 344.Daltroy LH, Iversen MD, Larson MG, Lew R, Wright E, Ryan J, Zwerling C,Fossel AH, Liang MH. A controlled trial of an educational program toprevent low back injuries. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997; 337(5):322 – 328.Davis PM, Badii M, Yassi A. Preventing disability from occupationalmusculoskeletal injuries in an urban, acute and tertiary care hospital: Resultsfrom a prevention and early active return-to-work safely program, Journal ofOccupational & Environmental Medicine. 2004; 46(12): 1253 – 1262.Dehlin O, Berg S, Andersson GB, Grimby G. Effect of physical training andergonomic counseling on the psychological perception of work and on thesubjective assessment of low-back insufficiency. Scandinavian Journal ofRehabilitation Medicine. 1981. 13(1): 1 – 9.Durand MJ, Loisel P. Therapeutic return to work: Rehabilitation in theworkplace. Work. 2001; 17(1): 57 – 63.Erlandsson B, Hakanson H, Ivarsson A, Nilsson P. The difference inprotection efficiency between earplugs and earmuffs. An investigationperformed at a workplace. Scandinavian Audiology. 1980; 9(4): 215 – 221.Fanello S, Jousset N, Roquelaure Y, Chotard-Frampas V, Delbos V.Evaluation of a training program for the prevention of lower back pain amonghospital employees. Nursing & Health Sciences. 2002; 4(1-2): 51 – 54.Faucett J, Garry M, Nadler D, Ettare D. A test of two training interventions toprevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity.Applied Ergonomics. 2002; 33(4): 337 – 347.A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss controlprograms (IPCs)45
Page 1 and 2: A systematic review of injury/illne
Page 3 and 4: Table of ContentsForeword ………
Page 5 and 6: ForewordIn recent years, the Instit
Page 7 and 8: employers with valuable information
Page 9 and 10: forward. In 1970, the Occupational
Page 11 and 12: Figure 1: IPC frameworkInput(to wor
Page 13 and 14: publish the results of the review i
Page 15 and 16: A key part of the literature would
Page 17 and 18: 2.4 Level 2 - Quality AssessmentIn
Page 19 and 20: allowed us to insure the answers pr
Page 21 and 22: Table 4: Best evidence synthesis gu
Page 23 and 24: Figure 3: Flowchart of systematic r
Page 25 and 26: • Return-to-work/disability manag
Page 27 and 28: etween groups, but only 32% adjuste
Page 29 and 30: Workstationadjustment andtrainingRo
Page 31 and 32: focused on just RTW (Durand et al.
Page 33 and 34: ExerciseThree medium quality studie
Page 35 and 36: compensation and medical bills is m
Page 37 and 38: interventions provide an insufficie
Page 39 and 40: Researchers and practitioners also
Page 41 and 42: 5.0 MessagesBefore making recommend
Page 43 and 44: 1) Of the articles that remained af
Page 45: 11) Agency for Healthcare Research
Page 49 and 50: workers: Randomized controlled work
Page 51 and 52: Nelson NA, Silverstein BA. Workplac
Page 53 and 54: pain in sedentary office workers -
Page 55 and 56: Appendix A: Content expertsNameBarb
Page 57 and 58: Appendix C: Stakeholder search term
Page 59 and 60: Appendix D - Literature search term
Page 61 and 62: A systematic review of injury and i
Page 63 and 64: Zohar DZohar D,Modifying Supervisor
Page 65 and 66: Level 1 Guide for ReviewersThe guid
Page 67 and 68: Appendix G: Quality Appraisal Revie
Page 69 and 70: Q4. Were time-based comparisons use
Page 71 and 72: If there are no major significant d
Page 73 and 74: Q17. Was the calendar duration of t
Page 75 and 76: a) YesBaseline differences were obs
Page 77 and 78: 5. List the jurisdiction where the
Page 79 and 80: have intended to prevent both “as
Page 81 and 82: Sample SizeEg: C 1 , C 2 , …(or I
Page 83 and 84: 29. If injury rates were calculated
Page 85 and 86: 38. Describe for each injury/illnes
Page 87 and 88: Appendix J: Quality assessment tabl
Page 89 and 90: StudyTime-Based ComparisonsRandom A
Page 91 and 92: Appendix K: Intervention descriptio
Page 93 and 94: InterventionCategoryErgonomictraini
Page 95 and 96: InterventionCategoryBricklayingmeth
Page 97 and 98:
InterventionCategoryTraining &equip
Page 99 and 100:
Appendix L: Study description*key t
Page 101 and 102:
InterventioncategoryPrograms(regula
Page 103 and 104:
InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
Page 105 and 106:
InterventioncategoryErgonomictraini
Page 107 and 108:
InterventioncategoryAuthor, Year QA
Page 109:
InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
show all

A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?