12.07.2015 Views

A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Q4. Were time-based comparisons used? (choose only one answer)a) Yes; pre-postEvaluations <strong>of</strong> the intervention took place at two time points – before (or at thebeginning stages <strong>of</strong> the intervention) <strong>and</strong> after (or towards the end) the intervention.b) Unclearc) NoEvaluation took place at only one time point during the study, i.e. the study is crosssectionalor post-intervention only.Q5. Was a r<strong>and</strong>om intervention allocation described?Inadequate description <strong>of</strong> the exposure/intervention allocation strategy makes itimpossible to reproduce the intervention in another population. This should be clearlystated in the study to allow for interventions to be reproducible by others. Effects <strong>of</strong>confounding may be reduced when participants are matched. However, r<strong>and</strong>omallocation <strong>of</strong> treatment/intervention conditions is the preferred scientific method as it ismost likely to <strong>control</strong> for confounding.a) Yes; r<strong>and</strong>omStudy participants, work units or organizations are described as r<strong>and</strong>omly receivingthe intervention. R<strong>and</strong>omization <strong>of</strong> intervention conditions is typically preferredbecause it avoids <strong>systematic</strong> confounding by known <strong>and</strong> unknown factors.b) Unclearc) NoQ6. Is the research question clearly stated?If the aim <strong>of</strong> the study is not clearly stated then results are likely <strong>of</strong> limited value. Aclear, explicit statement <strong>of</strong> objectives should be included in the study.a) Yesb) Unclearc) NoQ7. Please indicate which levels <strong>of</strong> recruitment were described (check all that apply)Recruitment is considered the effort by the investigator to obtain participation byspecific groups or individuals. Workplace interventions can typically occur at differentlevels. It is important to distinguish between the various levels so that results can beinterpreted in relation to the level at which interventions were applied. Also,differences in recruitment strategies for individuals, groups <strong>and</strong> workplaces could leadto differences in characteristics <strong>of</strong> the participants.a) Employees/workersb) Department/supervisorsc) Organizations/workplaced) Uncleare) Not DescribedA <strong>systematic</strong> <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>injury</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>illness</strong> <strong>prevention</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>loss</strong> <strong>control</strong>Programs (IPCs)67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!