6.0 References1) Robson L, Clarke J, Cullen K, Bieleck A, SeverinC, Bigelow P, IrvinE, Culyer A, Mahood Q. The Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Occupational Health<strong>and</strong> Safety Management Systems: A Systematic Review. Toronto,Institute for Work & Health; 2005.2) Brewer S, Van Eerd D, Amick III BC, Irvin E, Daum K, Gerr F,Moore JS, Cullen K, Rempel D. Workplace interventions to preventmusculoskeletal <strong>and</strong> visual symptoms <strong>and</strong> disorders among computerusers: A <strong>systematic</strong> <strong>review</strong>, Journal <strong>of</strong> Occupational Rehabilitation.2006; 16(3): 325 – 358.3) Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Frank JW, Bombardier C. A <strong>systematic</strong><strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> the prognosis <strong>of</strong> acute whiplash <strong>and</strong> a new conceptualframework to synthesize the literature, Spine. 2001; 26(19): E445 -E458.4) Franche R-L, Cullen K, Clarke J, MacEachen E, Frank J, Sinclair S,<strong>and</strong> the Workplace-based return-to-work intervention literature <strong>review</strong>group. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: A <strong>systematic</strong><strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> the quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative literature. Toronto: Institutefor Work & Health; 2004.5) Slavin RE. Best-evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to metaanalysis,Journal <strong>of</strong> Clinical Epidemiology. 1995; 48: 9-18.6) Cochrane Manual. 2005.http://www.cochrane.org/admin/manual.html.7) Cole D, Rivilis I, Van Eerd D, Cullen K, Irvin E, Kramer D.Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Participatory Ergonomic Interventions: A SystematicReview. Toronto, Institute for Work & Health; 2005.8) Ferry TS. Three Ps in safety: policies, procedures & performance.Safety Pr<strong>of</strong>essional. 2003; June: 48-52.9) Tompa E, Dolinschi R de Oliveira C, Irvin E. A Systematic Review <strong>of</strong>OHS Interventions with Economic Evaluations. Toronto, Institute forWork & Health; 2007.10) Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental <strong>and</strong> Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston,Houghton Mifflin; 2001.42 Institute for Work & Health
11) Agency for Healthcare Research <strong>and</strong> Quality Guidelines,http://www.ahrq.gov/12) Tompa E, Trevithick S, McLeod C. A <strong>systematic</strong> <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<strong>prevention</strong> incentives <strong>of</strong> insurance <strong>and</strong> regulatory mechanisms foroccupational health <strong>and</strong> safety. Toronto, ON: Institute for Work &Health; 2004.13) Amick B, Tullar J, Brewer S, Mahood Q, Irvin E, Pompeii L, WangA, Van Eerd D, Gimeno D, Evan<strong>of</strong>f B. Interventions in health-caresettings to protect musculoskeletal health: A <strong>systematic</strong> <strong>review</strong>.Toronto: Institute for Work & Health; 2006.A <strong>systematic</strong> <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>injury</strong>/<strong>illness</strong> <strong>prevention</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>loss</strong> <strong>control</strong>programs (IPCs)43
- Page 1 and 2: A systematic review of injury/illne
- Page 3 and 4: Table of ContentsForeword ………
- Page 5 and 6: ForewordIn recent years, the Instit
- Page 7 and 8: employers with valuable information
- Page 9 and 10: forward. In 1970, the Occupational
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 1: IPC frameworkInput(to wor
- Page 13 and 14: publish the results of the review i
- Page 15 and 16: A key part of the literature would
- Page 17 and 18: 2.4 Level 2 - Quality AssessmentIn
- Page 19 and 20: allowed us to insure the answers pr
- Page 21 and 22: Table 4: Best evidence synthesis gu
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 3: Flowchart of systematic r
- Page 25 and 26: • Return-to-work/disability manag
- Page 27 and 28: etween groups, but only 32% adjuste
- Page 29 and 30: Workstationadjustment andtrainingRo
- Page 31 and 32: focused on just RTW (Durand et al.
- Page 33 and 34: ExerciseThree medium quality studie
- Page 35 and 36: compensation and medical bills is m
- Page 37 and 38: interventions provide an insufficie
- Page 39 and 40: Researchers and practitioners also
- Page 41 and 42: 5.0 MessagesBefore making recommend
- Page 43: 1) Of the articles that remained af
- Page 47 and 48: Carayon P, Haims MC, Hoonakker PLT,
- Page 49 and 50: workers: Randomized controlled work
- Page 51 and 52: Nelson NA, Silverstein BA. Workplac
- Page 53 and 54: pain in sedentary office workers -
- Page 55 and 56: Appendix A: Content expertsNameBarb
- Page 57 and 58: Appendix C: Stakeholder search term
- Page 59 and 60: Appendix D - Literature search term
- Page 61 and 62: A systematic review of injury and i
- Page 63 and 64: Zohar DZohar D,Modifying Supervisor
- Page 65 and 66: Level 1 Guide for ReviewersThe guid
- Page 67 and 68: Appendix G: Quality Appraisal Revie
- Page 69 and 70: Q4. Were time-based comparisons use
- Page 71 and 72: If there are no major significant d
- Page 73 and 74: Q17. Was the calendar duration of t
- Page 75 and 76: a) YesBaseline differences were obs
- Page 77 and 78: 5. List the jurisdiction where the
- Page 79 and 80: have intended to prevent both “as
- Page 81 and 82: Sample SizeEg: C 1 , C 2 , …(or I
- Page 83 and 84: 29. If injury rates were calculated
- Page 85 and 86: 38. Describe for each injury/illnes
- Page 87 and 88: Appendix J: Quality assessment tabl
- Page 89 and 90: StudyTime-Based ComparisonsRandom A
- Page 91 and 92: Appendix K: Intervention descriptio
- Page 93 and 94: InterventionCategoryErgonomictraini
- Page 95 and 96:
InterventionCategoryBricklayingmeth
- Page 97 and 98:
InterventionCategoryTraining &equip
- Page 99 and 100:
Appendix L: Study description*key t
- Page 101 and 102:
InterventioncategoryPrograms(regula
- Page 103 and 104:
InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
- Page 105 and 106:
InterventioncategoryErgonomictraini
- Page 107 and 108:
InterventioncategoryAuthor, Year QA
- Page 109:
InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
Change language