A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

InterventionCategoryWorkstationadjustment -officeData entrydevices, armsupports -officeWorkstationadjustment &ergonomictraining -officePolicy(employerlevel)SupervisorpracticesAuthor,YearPsihogios, 2001Rempel,2006Robertson, 2003Rosenblum, 2006Shaw,2006QA* Study Design PreventionTypeM non-randomized Bothfield trialHMMMrandomized fieldtrialnon-randomizedfield trialrandomized fieldtrialrandomized crossoverdesignBothIntervention DescriptionParticipants were evenly dichotomized into two conditions based on normal (initial)gaze angle relative to horizontal (0° and -17.5°)I 1 : the monitor was moved to shift gaze angle from -17.5° to 0° for two weeks.C 1 : the monitor was maintained at a -17.5° gaze angle.I 2 : the monitor was placed to shift gaze angle from 0° to -17.5° for two weeks.C 2 : the monitor was maintained at a 0° gaze angle.I 1 : received a trackball and ergonomic training.I 2 : received forearm support board and ergonomic training.I 3 : received forearm support board, trackball and ergonomic training.C: received only the ergonomic training.Both I 1 : received new flexible workspaceI 2 : received new flexible workspace and office ergonomcis training.C: did not receive new workstations or training.Secondary I 1 : pre-employment isokinetic testing.C: received no intervention.Both I 1 : supervisor training workshop.C: received no intervention.94 Institute for Work & Health
InterventionCategoryTraining &equipment -forkliftsSafetytrainingAuthor,YearShinozaki, 2001Sinclair,2003QA* Study Design PreventionTypeM non-randomized Bothfield trialMrandomized fieldtrialIntervention DescriptionI 1 : personal approach (written & verbal instructions on lumbar support and jacket).I 2 : improvement of seats and tires to reduce vibration.C 1: blue collar workers who did not receive intervention.C 2: white collar workers who did not receive intervention.Both I 1 : multi-topic safety training using multi-media.C: received usual training.Exercise -workplaceData entrydevices -officeData entrydevices -officeTraining -manualliftingSjogren,2006Swanson,2006Tittiranonda, 1999Tuchin,1998MMMMrandomized crossoverdesignrandomized fieldtrialrandomized fieldtrialrandomized fieldtrialSecondary I 1 : workplace exercise training.IC 1 : received delayed intervention.Both I 1 : alternative keyboard.SecondaryBothC: conventional keyboard.I 1 : received Apple Adjustable Keyboard plus 1 h ergonomic training.I 2 : received Comfort Keyboard System plus 1 h ergonomic training.I 3 : received Microsoft Natural Keyboard plus 1 h ergonomic training.C: received conventional keyboard plus 1 h ergonomic training.I 1 : training detailing (back anatomy, proper lifting and back care).C 1 : did not receive education classes (as in I1) was instructed to perform a series ofdaily exercises.C 2 : received no intervention.A systematic review of injury and illness prevention and loss control programs (IPCs)95
Page 1 and 2:
A systematic review of injury/illne
Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsForeword ………
Page 5 and 6:
ForewordIn recent years, the Instit
Page 7 and 8:
employers with valuable information
Page 9 and 10:
forward. In 1970, the Occupational
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 1: IPC frameworkInput(to wor
Page 13 and 14:
publish the results of the review i
Page 15 and 16:
A key part of the literature would
Page 17 and 18:
2.4 Level 2 - Quality AssessmentIn
Page 19 and 20:
allowed us to insure the answers pr
Page 21 and 22:
Table 4: Best evidence synthesis gu
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 3: Flowchart of systematic r
Page 25 and 26:
• Return-to-work/disability manag
Page 27 and 28:
etween groups, but only 32% adjuste
Page 29 and 30:
Workstationadjustment andtrainingRo
Page 31 and 32:
focused on just RTW (Durand et al.
Page 33 and 34:
ExerciseThree medium quality studie
Page 35 and 36:
compensation and medical bills is m
Page 37 and 38:
interventions provide an insufficie
Page 39 and 40:
Researchers and practitioners also
Page 41 and 42:
5.0 MessagesBefore making recommend
Page 43 and 44:
1) Of the articles that remained af
Page 45 and 46: 11) Agency for Healthcare Research
Page 47 and 48: Carayon P, Haims MC, Hoonakker PLT,
Page 49 and 50: workers: Randomized controlled work
Page 51 and 52: Nelson NA, Silverstein BA. Workplac
Page 53 and 54: pain in sedentary office workers -
Page 55 and 56: Appendix A: Content expertsNameBarb
Page 57 and 58: Appendix C: Stakeholder search term
Page 59 and 60: Appendix D - Literature search term
Page 61 and 62: A systematic review of injury and i
Page 63 and 64: Zohar DZohar D,Modifying Supervisor
Page 65 and 66: Level 1 Guide for ReviewersThe guid
Page 67 and 68: Appendix G: Quality Appraisal Revie
Page 69 and 70: Q4. Were time-based comparisons use
Page 71 and 72: If there are no major significant d
Page 73 and 74: Q17. Was the calendar duration of t
Page 75 and 76: a) YesBaseline differences were obs
Page 77 and 78: 5. List the jurisdiction where the
Page 79 and 80: have intended to prevent both “as
Page 81 and 82: Sample SizeEg: C 1 , C 2 , …(or I
Page 83 and 84: 29. If injury rates were calculated
Page 85 and 86: 38. Describe for each injury/illnes
Page 87 and 88: Appendix J: Quality assessment tabl
Page 89 and 90: StudyTime-Based ComparisonsRandom A
Page 91 and 92: Appendix K: Intervention descriptio
Page 93 and 94: InterventionCategoryErgonomictraini
Page 95: InterventionCategoryBricklayingmeth
Page 99 and 100: Appendix L: Study description*key t
Page 101 and 102: InterventioncategoryPrograms(regula
Page 103 and 104: InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
Page 105 and 106: InterventioncategoryErgonomictraini
Page 107 and 108: InterventioncategoryAuthor, Year QA
Page 109: InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
show all

A systematic review of injury/illness prevention and loss control ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?