processing industry. WORK: A Journal <strong>of</strong> Prevention, Assessment &Rehabilitation. 2006; 26(2): 107 – 114.Shinozaki T, Yano E, Murata K. Intervention for <strong>prevention</strong> <strong>of</strong> low back painin Japanese forklift workers. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Industrial Medicine. 2001;40(2): 141 – 144.Sinclair RC, Smith R, Colligan M, Prince M, Nguyen T, Stayner L.Evaluation <strong>of</strong> a safety training program in three food service companies.Journal <strong>of</strong> Safety Research. 2003; 34(5): 547 – 558.Sjogren T, Nissinen KJ, Jarvenpaa SK, Ojanen MT, Vanharanta H, MalkiaEA. Effects <strong>of</strong> a workplace physical exercise intervention on the intensity <strong>of</strong>low back symptoms in <strong>of</strong>fice workers: A cluster r<strong>and</strong>omized <strong>control</strong>led crossoverdesign. Journal <strong>of</strong> Back & Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2006; 19(1):13 – 24.Smedley J, Trevelyan F, Inskip H, Buckle P, Cooper C, Coggon D. Impact <strong>of</strong>ergonomic intervention on back pain among nurses. Sc<strong>and</strong>inavian Journal <strong>of</strong>Work, Environment & Health. 2003; 29(2): 117 – 123.Staal JB, Hlobil H, Twisk JWR, Smid T, Koke AJA, van Mechelen W.Graded activity for low back pain in occupational health care: A r<strong>and</strong>omized,<strong>control</strong>led trial. Annals <strong>of</strong> Internal Medicine. 2004; 140(2): 77 - 84.Swanson NG, Sauter SL. A multivariate evaluation <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fice ergonomicintervention using longitudinal data. Theoretical Issues in ErgonomicsScience. 2006; 7(1): 3 – 17.Tittiranonda P, Rempel D, Armstrong T, Burastero S. Effect <strong>of</strong> four computerkeyboards in computer users with upper extremity musculoskeletaldisorders. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Industrial Medicine. 1999; 35(6): 647 – 661.Tuchin P, Pollard H. The cost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong> spinal care education as apreventive strategy for spinal <strong>injury</strong>. Journal <strong>of</strong> Occupational Health & Safety- Australia & New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. 1998; 14(1): 43 – 51.Van der Molen HF, Grouwstra R, Kuijer PPFM, Sluiter JK, Frings-DresenMHW. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> adjusting working height <strong>and</strong> mechanizing <strong>of</strong> transport onphysical work dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> local discomfort in construction work.Ergonomics. 2004; 47(7): 772 – 783.Van Heerden M, Noteboom H, Thomas C, Walters G, Winter B. Theinfluence <strong>of</strong> an anteriorly tilted chair <strong>and</strong> ergonomic adaptations on low back50 Institute for Work & Health
pain in sedentary <strong>of</strong>fice workers - a comparative study. South African Journal<strong>of</strong> Physiotherapy. 1998; 44(3): 78 – 83.Videman T, Rauhala H, Asp S, Lindstrom K, Cedercreutz G, Kamppi M,Tola S, Troup JDG. Patient-h<strong>and</strong>ling skill, back injuries, <strong>and</strong> back pain: anintervention study in nursing. Spine. 1989; 14(2): 148 – 156.Warburton AL, Shepherd JP. Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> toughened glassware in terms<strong>of</strong> reducing <strong>injury</strong> in bars: A r<strong>and</strong>omised <strong>control</strong>led trial. Injury Prevention.2000; 6(1): 36 – 40.Wassell JT, Gardner LI, L<strong>and</strong>sittel DP, Johnston JJ, Johnston JM. Aprospective study <strong>of</strong> back belts for <strong>prevention</strong> <strong>of</strong> back pain <strong>and</strong> <strong>injury</strong>.Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Medical Association. 2000; 284(21): 2727 – 2732.Yassi A, Tate R, Cooper JE, Snow C, Vallentyne S, Khokhar JB. Earlyintervention for back-injured nurses at a large Canadian tertiary care hospital:An evaluation <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>and</strong> cost benefits <strong>of</strong> a two-year pilotproject. Occupational Medicine (Oxford). 1995; 45(4): 209 – 214.Yassi A, Cooper JE, Tate RB, Gerlach S, Muir M, Trottier J, Massey K. Ar<strong>and</strong>omized <strong>control</strong>led trial to prevent patient lift <strong>and</strong> transfer injuries <strong>of</strong>health care workers, Spine, 2001; 26(16): 1739 – 1746.Zohar D. Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: Aleadership-based intervention model. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Psychology. 2002;87(1): 156 – 166.A <strong>systematic</strong> <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>injury</strong>/<strong>illness</strong> <strong>prevention</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>loss</strong> <strong>control</strong>programs (IPCs)51
- Page 1 and 2: A systematic review of injury/illne
- Page 3 and 4: Table of ContentsForeword ………
- Page 5 and 6: ForewordIn recent years, the Instit
- Page 7 and 8: employers with valuable information
- Page 9 and 10: forward. In 1970, the Occupational
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 1: IPC frameworkInput(to wor
- Page 13 and 14: publish the results of the review i
- Page 15 and 16: A key part of the literature would
- Page 17 and 18: 2.4 Level 2 - Quality AssessmentIn
- Page 19 and 20: allowed us to insure the answers pr
- Page 21 and 22: Table 4: Best evidence synthesis gu
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 3: Flowchart of systematic r
- Page 25 and 26: • Return-to-work/disability manag
- Page 27 and 28: etween groups, but only 32% adjuste
- Page 29 and 30: Workstationadjustment andtrainingRo
- Page 31 and 32: focused on just RTW (Durand et al.
- Page 33 and 34: ExerciseThree medium quality studie
- Page 35 and 36: compensation and medical bills is m
- Page 37 and 38: interventions provide an insufficie
- Page 39 and 40: Researchers and practitioners also
- Page 41 and 42: 5.0 MessagesBefore making recommend
- Page 43 and 44: 1) Of the articles that remained af
- Page 45 and 46: 11) Agency for Healthcare Research
- Page 47 and 48: Carayon P, Haims MC, Hoonakker PLT,
- Page 49 and 50: workers: Randomized controlled work
- Page 51: Nelson NA, Silverstein BA. Workplac
- Page 55 and 56: Appendix A: Content expertsNameBarb
- Page 57 and 58: Appendix C: Stakeholder search term
- Page 59 and 60: Appendix D - Literature search term
- Page 61 and 62: A systematic review of injury and i
- Page 63 and 64: Zohar DZohar D,Modifying Supervisor
- Page 65 and 66: Level 1 Guide for ReviewersThe guid
- Page 67 and 68: Appendix G: Quality Appraisal Revie
- Page 69 and 70: Q4. Were time-based comparisons use
- Page 71 and 72: If there are no major significant d
- Page 73 and 74: Q17. Was the calendar duration of t
- Page 75 and 76: a) YesBaseline differences were obs
- Page 77 and 78: 5. List the jurisdiction where the
- Page 79 and 80: have intended to prevent both “as
- Page 81 and 82: Sample SizeEg: C 1 , C 2 , …(or I
- Page 83 and 84: 29. If injury rates were calculated
- Page 85 and 86: 38. Describe for each injury/illnes
- Page 87 and 88: Appendix J: Quality assessment tabl
- Page 89 and 90: StudyTime-Based ComparisonsRandom A
- Page 91 and 92: Appendix K: Intervention descriptio
- Page 93 and 94: InterventionCategoryErgonomictraini
- Page 95 and 96: InterventionCategoryBricklayingmeth
- Page 97 and 98: InterventionCategoryTraining &equip
- Page 99 and 100: Appendix L: Study description*key t
- Page 101 and 102: InterventioncategoryPrograms(regula
- Page 103 and 104:
InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
- Page 105 and 106:
InterventioncategoryErgonomictraini
- Page 107 and 108:
InterventioncategoryAuthor, Year QA
- Page 109:
InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
Change language