Injury/Illnessoutcome termspackers, mining, municipalities, newspaper, nurses, <strong>of</strong>fice,<strong>of</strong>fice worker, oil <strong>and</strong> gas, operator, painter, pipe fitter,plumbers, postal, precarious worker, public administration,provincial worker, pulp <strong>and</strong> paper, reporter, retail, sanitary,service, shipping, state government, supervisor, support,teacher, telecommunication, temporary worker,transportationWarehousing, welder, white collar worker, worker,workplaceNOTS:agricultural workers, children, commercial fishing, farmworkers, home <strong>of</strong>fices, migrant workers, militaryinstallations, soldiers, students, teleworkers, youth worker"sprains <strong>and</strong> strains", accidents, acute toxic hepatitis, ankleinjuries, arm injuries, arthralgia, arthritis, asbestosis,assault, back injuries, back pain, barotraumas, black lung,bladder cancer, brain injuries, bronchogenic carcinoma,bruises, burns, bursitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, caughtbetween, causalgia, cervico-brachial neuralgia, claim rate,claims, contact allergic dermatitis, contact irritant,dermatitis, contusions, crush, cumulative trauma disorders,cuts, deaths, elevated blood lead, encephalitis,epicondylitis, experience modification ratio, extremityinjuries, eye injuries, falls (from above, same level),fatality (ies), finger injuries, forearm injuries, fractures,h<strong>and</strong> injuries, head injuries, hepatitis, impairment rating,inhalation, knee injuries, lacerations, lead poisoning, leadtoxicity, leg injuries, <strong>loss</strong> ratio, lost time <strong>injury</strong>, lost workday, lumbar, maximum medical improvement, medicaltreatment, mental disorders, mental <strong>illness</strong>es,mesothelioma, motor vehicle accidents, muscular diseases,musculoskeletal diseases, musculoskeletal injuries,musculoskeletal system, my<strong>of</strong>ascial pain syndromes, neckinjuries, needlestick injuries, nerve compressionsyndromes, neuralgia, noise induced hearing <strong>loss</strong>, non fatalinjuries, occupational asthma, OSHA logs, osteoarthritis,permanent partial disability, pneumoconiosis, polyneuritis,polyradiculoneuritis, puncture, radiation <strong>injury</strong>,radiculopathy, recordable, repetitive trauma, respiratory<strong>illness</strong>es, RSI, restricted work days, shoulder impingementsyndrome, silicosis, slips, s<strong>of</strong>t tissue injuries, spinal cordinjuries, spine injuries, struck by, synovitis, TB, temporarypartial disability, tendonitis, tendon injuries, tennis elbow,tenosynovitis, thoracic outlet syndrome, total disability,toxic inhalation, trips, trunk injuries, ulnar nervecompression syndrome, vision disorders, welding fumefever, work-aggravated asthma, work-related asthma, wristinjuriesNOTS: cancer, depression, floc lung, incidents, leukemia,neoplasms, productivity58 Institute for Work & Health
A <strong>systematic</strong> <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>injury</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>illness</strong> <strong>prevention</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>loss</strong> <strong>control</strong>programs (IPCs)59
- Page 1 and 2:
A systematic review of injury/illne
- Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsForeword ………
- Page 5 and 6:
ForewordIn recent years, the Instit
- Page 7 and 8:
employers with valuable information
- Page 9 and 10: forward. In 1970, the Occupational
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 1: IPC frameworkInput(to wor
- Page 13 and 14: publish the results of the review i
- Page 15 and 16: A key part of the literature would
- Page 17 and 18: 2.4 Level 2 - Quality AssessmentIn
- Page 19 and 20: allowed us to insure the answers pr
- Page 21 and 22: Table 4: Best evidence synthesis gu
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 3: Flowchart of systematic r
- Page 25 and 26: • Return-to-work/disability manag
- Page 27 and 28: etween groups, but only 32% adjuste
- Page 29 and 30: Workstationadjustment andtrainingRo
- Page 31 and 32: focused on just RTW (Durand et al.
- Page 33 and 34: ExerciseThree medium quality studie
- Page 35 and 36: compensation and medical bills is m
- Page 37 and 38: interventions provide an insufficie
- Page 39 and 40: Researchers and practitioners also
- Page 41 and 42: 5.0 MessagesBefore making recommend
- Page 43 and 44: 1) Of the articles that remained af
- Page 45 and 46: 11) Agency for Healthcare Research
- Page 47 and 48: Carayon P, Haims MC, Hoonakker PLT,
- Page 49 and 50: workers: Randomized controlled work
- Page 51 and 52: Nelson NA, Silverstein BA. Workplac
- Page 53 and 54: pain in sedentary office workers -
- Page 55 and 56: Appendix A: Content expertsNameBarb
- Page 57 and 58: Appendix C: Stakeholder search term
- Page 59: Appendix D - Literature search term
- Page 63 and 64: Zohar DZohar D,Modifying Supervisor
- Page 65 and 66: Level 1 Guide for ReviewersThe guid
- Page 67 and 68: Appendix G: Quality Appraisal Revie
- Page 69 and 70: Q4. Were time-based comparisons use
- Page 71 and 72: If there are no major significant d
- Page 73 and 74: Q17. Was the calendar duration of t
- Page 75 and 76: a) YesBaseline differences were obs
- Page 77 and 78: 5. List the jurisdiction where the
- Page 79 and 80: have intended to prevent both “as
- Page 81 and 82: Sample SizeEg: C 1 , C 2 , …(or I
- Page 83 and 84: 29. If injury rates were calculated
- Page 85 and 86: 38. Describe for each injury/illnes
- Page 87 and 88: Appendix J: Quality assessment tabl
- Page 89 and 90: StudyTime-Based ComparisonsRandom A
- Page 91 and 92: Appendix K: Intervention descriptio
- Page 93 and 94: InterventionCategoryErgonomictraini
- Page 95 and 96: InterventionCategoryBricklayingmeth
- Page 97 and 98: InterventionCategoryTraining &equip
- Page 99 and 100: Appendix L: Study description*key t
- Page 101 and 102: InterventioncategoryPrograms(regula
- Page 103 and 104: InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju
- Page 105 and 106: InterventioncategoryErgonomictraini
- Page 107 and 108: InterventioncategoryAuthor, Year QA
- Page 109: InterventioncategoryWorkstationadju