12.07.2015 Views

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE HUMBOLDT CURRENT SYSTEM OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CHILE140120120100Species richness10080604080604020200Lessonia trabeculataLessonia nigrescensMacrocystis integrifoliaMacrocystis integrifoliaDurvillaea antarcticaHalopteris funicularisCorallina <strong>of</strong>ficinalisGelidium <strong>chile</strong>nsePhragmatopoma moerchiPerumytilus purpuratusPerumytilus purpuratusPyrua praeputialis01 to 10 10 to 1000 >1000Patch size (m 2 )BKelps Turf algae Suspension feedersAFigure 13 (A) Species richness <strong>of</strong> macroinvertebrates associated with habitat-forming macroalgae or suspensionfeeders from intertidal <strong>and</strong> subtidal hard bottoms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>and</strong> <strong>central</strong> coast <strong>of</strong> Chile; for reasons<strong>of</strong> comparability only studies that reported at least seven phyla <strong>of</strong> associated macr<strong>of</strong>auna were considered.(B) Average species richness in biotic habitats <strong>of</strong> different patch sizes; information obtained from López &Stotz 1997, Gelcich 1999, Godoy 2000, Thiel & Vásquez 2000, Cáceres 2001, Cerda & Castilla 2001,Hernández et al. 2001, Vásquez et al. 2001b, Thiel & Ullrich 2002, Sepúlveda et al. 2003a,b, Prado & Castilla 2006.<strong>the</strong> fact that kelp beds <strong>and</strong> ascidian <strong>and</strong> bivalve reefs have a comparatively large spatial extentwhile patches <strong>of</strong> turf algae rarely cover more than a few square metres (Figure 13B). A positiverelationship between patch size <strong>and</strong> number <strong>of</strong> associated species has been revealed for most habitatformingspecies (Vásquez & Santelices 1984, Villouta & Santelices 1984, Thiel & Vásquez 2000,Hernández et al. 2001, Sepúlveda et al. 2003a,b).Several macr<strong>of</strong>auna species have been reported from a variety <strong>of</strong> different biotic habitats. Of251 species identified from biotic substrata (see references in Figure 13), 11.6% have been foundin all three types <strong>of</strong> main biotic habitats (kelps, turf algae <strong>and</strong> suspension feeder reefs), 23.5% havebeen found in two types <strong>and</strong> 64.9% are only reported from one type <strong>of</strong> habitat. It must be emphasisedthat so far no single study has compared <strong>the</strong> associated fauna among <strong>the</strong> three main types <strong>of</strong> EEs,<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is little indication that <strong>the</strong>re are habitat specialists that only occur in one type <strong>of</strong> bioticsubstratum. For example, Hernández et al. (2001) emphasise that several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> polychaetes foundin patches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> barnacle Austromegabalanus psittacus also occur in o<strong>the</strong>r habitats. Similarly,Sepúlveda et al. (2003b) mention that many species from surrounding habitats associate with <strong>the</strong>reef-building polychaetes Phragmatopoma moerchi. They also emphasise that <strong>the</strong>se biotic substratamay serve as recruitment habitat for some organisms. Similar observations led López & Stotz(1997), who found juvenile stages <strong>of</strong> many crustaceans <strong>and</strong> molluscs in Corallina <strong>of</strong>ficinalis, to239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!