MARTIN THIEL ET AL.p. 240ff.). Durvillaea antarctica does not extend fur<strong>the</strong>r north than 32°S. Patches or belts formedin <strong>the</strong> low intertidal zone by Lessonia nigrescens <strong>and</strong> Durvillaea antarctica generally have extents<strong>of</strong> several square metres up to >100 m 2 . Subtidal kelp forests <strong>of</strong> Lessonia trabeculata <strong>and</strong> Macrocystisspp. may extend over >1000 m 2 , comprising some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> largest habitat patches formed byEEs. Distances between neighbouring patches are small in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Lessonia spp. <strong>and</strong> Durvillaeaantarctica but individual forests <strong>of</strong> Macrocystis spp. can be separated by several hundred kilometres(see also Kelp forests, p. 240ff.). Persistence <strong>of</strong> patches over time may be favoured by recruitment<strong>of</strong> new sporophytes into existing kelp patches (Santelices & Ojeda 1984).Turf algae generally form smaller patches, with individual patches rarely exceeding an area <strong>of</strong>a few square metres. Corallina <strong>of</strong>ficinalis <strong>and</strong> Gelidium <strong>chile</strong>nse (<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r turf algae, e.g., Montemariahorridula, Rhodymenia skottsbergii) form long-lived patches in <strong>the</strong> intertidal zone (López& Stotz 1997, Vásquez & Vega 2004a, Wieters 2005), <strong>and</strong> distances between neighbouring patchesare relatively small (Table 3). Glossophora kunthii, Halopteris funicularis, Asparagopsis armata(<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, including Corallina <strong>of</strong>ficinalis) occur mainly on shallow subtidal hard bottoms where<strong>the</strong>y form patches <strong>of</strong> several square metres <strong>and</strong>, while thalli may disappear during <strong>the</strong> winter, <strong>the</strong>stolons persist over several years (Vásquez et al. 2001a). Patches may extend <strong>the</strong>ir size or renewthalli via asexual proliferation.The polychaete Phragmatopoma moerchi forms patches <strong>of</strong> several square metres in extent in<strong>the</strong> low intertidal <strong>and</strong> shallow subtidal zone in areas with a high supply <strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> shell fragments(Sepúlveda et al. 2003b). These patches persist over several years, but disappear if renewal isreduced, ei<strong>the</strong>r due to low larval supply or high postsettlement mortality (Zamorano et al. 1995).The barnacle Austromegabalanus psittacus forms aggregations in <strong>the</strong> low intertidal <strong>and</strong> shallowsubtidal zone; patches generally are small, rarely exceeding more than a few square metres in area.This species occurs all along <strong>the</strong> coast <strong>of</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>and</strong> <strong>central</strong> Chile <strong>and</strong> little is known about <strong>the</strong>temporal dynamics <strong>of</strong> individual patches. Bivalves form extensive patches <strong>of</strong> a few square metresup to >1000 m 2 in area in <strong>the</strong> mid-intertidal (Perumytilus purpuratus), low intertidal (Semimytilusalgosus) <strong>and</strong> subtidal zones (Choromytilus chorus, Aulacomya ater). In <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> predatorspatches can persist over many years (Durán & Castilla 1989), facilitated by regular recruitmentinto adult patches (Alvarado & Castilla 1996). Most bivalve species have a wide latitudinaldistribution, but Perumytilus purpuratus <strong>and</strong> Aulacomya ater are almost entirely absent over anextensive area in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Chile between 23°S <strong>and</strong> 32°S (Fernández et al. 2000, personal observations),which appears to be mainly due to limited larval supply in that region (for Perumytiluspurpuratus see Navarrete et al. 2005). The ascidian Pyura <strong>chile</strong>nsis occurs in small patches in <strong>the</strong>shallow subtidal zone (e.g., Vásquez & Vega 2004b), while <strong>the</strong> congener P. praeputialis formsextensive belts in <strong>the</strong> low intertidal zone (Table 3). Patches <strong>of</strong> P. <strong>chile</strong>nsis persist over many years at<strong>the</strong> same location (personal observations), but little is known about <strong>the</strong> population dynamics withinpatches. In P. praeputialis, recruitment may be most successful in <strong>the</strong> vicinity <strong>of</strong> adults (Clarkeet al. 1999), <strong>the</strong>reby favouring <strong>the</strong> long-term persistence <strong>of</strong> patches. While P. <strong>chile</strong>nsis has a widegeographic distribution, P. praeputialis is restricted to a small range <strong>of</strong> 70 km along <strong>the</strong> Bay <strong>of</strong>Ant<strong>of</strong>agasta (23°S) in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Chile (Castilla et al. 2000).Macr<strong>of</strong>auna associated with eco<strong>system</strong> engineers on hard bottomsA wide diversity <strong>of</strong> organisms is associated with habitat-forming species on hard bottoms <strong>of</strong>nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>and</strong> <strong>central</strong> Chile. Highest species richness is found in <strong>the</strong> kelp holdfasts, intermediatenumbers <strong>of</strong> associated species are reported from ascidian <strong>and</strong> bivalve reefs, <strong>and</strong> turf algae harbourfewest species <strong>of</strong> associated macr<strong>of</strong>auna (Figure 13A). This relationship appears to be related to238
THE HUMBOLDT CURRENT SYSTEM OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CHILE140120120100Species richness10080604080604020200Lessonia trabeculataLessonia nigrescensMacrocystis integrifoliaMacrocystis integrifoliaDurvillaea antarcticaHalopteris funicularisCorallina <strong>of</strong>ficinalisGelidium <strong>chile</strong>nsePhragmatopoma moerchiPerumytilus purpuratusPerumytilus purpuratusPyrua praeputialis01 to 10 10 to 1000 >1000Patch size (m 2 )BKelps Turf algae Suspension feedersAFigure 13 (A) Species richness <strong>of</strong> macroinvertebrates associated with habitat-forming macroalgae or suspensionfeeders from intertidal <strong>and</strong> subtidal hard bottoms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>and</strong> <strong>central</strong> coast <strong>of</strong> Chile; for reasons<strong>of</strong> comparability only studies that reported at least seven phyla <strong>of</strong> associated macr<strong>of</strong>auna were considered.(B) Average species richness in biotic habitats <strong>of</strong> different patch sizes; information obtained from López &Stotz 1997, Gelcich 1999, Godoy 2000, Thiel & Vásquez 2000, Cáceres 2001, Cerda & Castilla 2001,Hernández et al. 2001, Vásquez et al. 2001b, Thiel & Ullrich 2002, Sepúlveda et al. 2003a,b, Prado & Castilla 2006.<strong>the</strong> fact that kelp beds <strong>and</strong> ascidian <strong>and</strong> bivalve reefs have a comparatively large spatial extentwhile patches <strong>of</strong> turf algae rarely cover more than a few square metres (Figure 13B). A positiverelationship between patch size <strong>and</strong> number <strong>of</strong> associated species has been revealed for most habitatformingspecies (Vásquez & Santelices 1984, Villouta & Santelices 1984, Thiel & Vásquez 2000,Hernández et al. 2001, Sepúlveda et al. 2003a,b).Several macr<strong>of</strong>auna species have been reported from a variety <strong>of</strong> different biotic habitats. Of251 species identified from biotic substrata (see references in Figure 13), 11.6% have been foundin all three types <strong>of</strong> main biotic habitats (kelps, turf algae <strong>and</strong> suspension feeder reefs), 23.5% havebeen found in two types <strong>and</strong> 64.9% are only reported from one type <strong>of</strong> habitat. It must be emphasisedthat so far no single study has compared <strong>the</strong> associated fauna among <strong>the</strong> three main types <strong>of</strong> EEs,<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is little indication that <strong>the</strong>re are habitat specialists that only occur in one type <strong>of</strong> bioticsubstratum. For example, Hernández et al. (2001) emphasise that several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> polychaetes foundin patches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> barnacle Austromegabalanus psittacus also occur in o<strong>the</strong>r habitats. Similarly,Sepúlveda et al. (2003b) mention that many species from surrounding habitats associate with <strong>the</strong>reef-building polychaetes Phragmatopoma moerchi. They also emphasise that <strong>the</strong>se biotic substratamay serve as recruitment habitat for some organisms. Similar observations led López & Stotz(1997), who found juvenile stages <strong>of</strong> many crustaceans <strong>and</strong> molluscs in Corallina <strong>of</strong>ficinalis, to239