the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

More documents

Recommendations

Info

MARTIN THIEL ET AL.speared large fish and marine mammals such as sea lions (Otaria juvata and O. flavescens) (Santoroet al. 2005). A report on the navigation off the west coast of South America carried out by Lothrop(1932) showed artifacts used by aboriginal people of northern Chile. Most remarkable was a raftcomposed of two cylinders of seal hides tied together to support a small platform on top, and whilevoyages out of sight of land were rarely attempted, it was not uncommon to remain at sea for 2 or3 days (Lothrop 1932).Llagostera (1979), working between 21°S and 25°S, found evidence of groups of people withthe ability to exploit natural resources from coastal waters ~10,000 yr BP, and he found remainsof molluscan species such as Concholepas concholepas, Fissurella spp., Tegula atra, Choromytiluschorus, several species of fishes (e.g., Isacia conceptionis and Trachurus murphyi), and semifossilisedbones of sea lions and dolphins. Reports from southern Peru suggest specific sites wheremainly fish and seabird resources were exploited (Keefer et al. 1998), while at other (more ephemeral)sites they processed mainly molluscs (Sandweiss 2003). Studies from southern Peru andnorthern Chile demonstrated that the resources exploited by early coastal settlers of the HCSchanged with time (Llagostera 1979, Sandweiss et al. 2001), which is taken as an indication ofclimate change and EN events, causing gradual or abrupt changes in available resources. Similarobservations were made in central Chile near 32°S (Báez et al. 2004). For the late Holocene(4000–2000 BP) Méndez & Jackson (2004) reported a high degree of mobility of coastal peoplein central Chile, who apparently moved between different sites in a region, exploiting the accessibleresources at a given site in an opportunistic manner.A systematic study of remains of marine invertebrate fauna from central Chile (Curaumilla,33°S) defined the ecological role of early inhabitants as shellfish gatherers (Jerardino et al. 1992).According to these authors, they probably modified areas of the rocky intertidal, causing decreasesin mean sizes of Concholepas and Fissurella. Interestingly, Llagostera (1979) suggested that theappearance of larger shells of Concholepas in shell heaps is indication of an increasing radius ofaction and the exploitation of new fishing grounds. This author also remarked that the appearanceof some fish species (e.g., cusk eels, locally called ‘congrio’, from the genus Genypterus, whichcan only be fished at greater depths) around 3000 BP is indication that coastal fishermen startedto venture farther out to sea during that time period.In general, prehistoric people used littoral resources in an opportunistic manner, and duringthe past millennia they increasingly widened their radius of action, improved their navigating skills(rafts) and developed their fishing techniques (fishing nets, hooks). Extraction of marine resourceswas not only for subsistence of local groups, but also for an intensive transfer of fish toward inlandsites (Briones et al. 2005). Local people persisted and exploited marine resources until well afterthe appearance of the Spanish (Llagostera 1979). The resources collected and captured by prehistoricpeople are the same that still today play an important role in the fisheries of northern and centralChile.Artisanal benthic fisheriesThe present artisanal fisheries in the HCS between 18°S and 35°S are very diverse, comprising~13 species of algae, ~45 species of invertebrates (molluscs, crustaceans, echinoderms, tunicates)and ~68 fish species (SERNAPESCA 2005). Before the 1980s, fisheries in general were of lowlevel and stable since products only went to local markets and the intensity of exploitation wascomparatively moderate (Stotz 1997, González et al. 2006). During the mid-1980s the export ofmost of the resources was initiated, producing increases in captures, and once the accumulatedbiomass was used up, the resources remained at low and fluctuating levels (Figure 22). In general,these fluctuations have been interpreted as the classical signs of a badly regulated fishery, as278
THE HUMBOLDT CURRENT SYSTEM OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CHILELandings (t)5000A4000Stock3000 build-up2000100001200010000B80006000400020000250002000015000100005000080006000400020000CD19791981Argopecten purpuratusAMERBAquacultureFisheryMesodesma donaciumClosuresAMERBConcholepas concholepasLoxechinus albusFishery AMERB198319851987198919911993199519971999200120032005250002000015000100005000Figure 22 Landings of the four most valuable invertebrate resources in Regions I–VIII, according to fisherystatistics of SERNAPESCA: www.sernapesca.cl and AMERB, ‘Area de Manejo y Explotación de RecursosBentónicos’ (MEABR, Management and Exploitation Area for Benthic Resources).described by Hilborn & Walters (1992): discovery of a stock, development of its fishery andsubsequent overexploitation and eventually collapse.In order to improve the management status of benthic fisheries (mainly dive fisheries forinvertebrates and algae), Chile has established a system of Territorial User Rights for Fisheries(TURF), called Areas de Manejo y Explotación de Recursos Bentónicos (AMERB or Managementand Exploitation Areas for Benthic Resources MEABR, which are the diverse names and shortcutsunder which they have been described in the literature) (Castilla 1997, Stotz 1997, Castilla &Fernández 1998, Aviléz & Jerez 1999, Bernal et al. 1999, Meltzoff et al. 2002, González et al.2006). This management tool grants exclusive fishing rights over a defined coastal area to legallyestablished organisations of local fishermen. These areas are exploited according to a managementplan, developed by professionals, approved by authority, and then worked by fishermen under thepermanent supervision of the administrative authority. This system was initiated in practice byfishermen at the beginning of the 1990s, but legally established in 1997 (Stotz 1997). In general,it has proven to be a good tool to increase stocks and recover depleted fisheries (Stotz 1997, Castilla0Harvest aquaculture (t)XIVVRMVIVIIVIIIIXXIXIIIIIIII18° −31° −42° −53° −Southern latitude279
Page 1 and 2:
Oceanography and Marine Biology: An
Page 3 and 4:
THE HUMBOLDT CURRENT SYSTEM OF NORT
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34: THE HUMBOLDT CURRENT SYSTEM OF NORT
Page 83: THE HUMBOLDT CURRENT SYSTEM OF NORT
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
show all

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?