12.07.2015 Views

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE HUMBOLDT CURRENT SYSTEM OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CHILEProperties <strong>of</strong> coastal waters in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Chile are primarily driven by remote equatorial forcing,which can provoke strong changes in PP due to <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> nutrients <strong>and</strong> essential traceelements, corresponding to ENSO cycles (Takesue et al. 2004). Such alterations can trigger acomplex chain <strong>of</strong> biological effects derived from bottom-up controls <strong>and</strong> physiological constraints,which may involve several levels <strong>of</strong> biological organisation at different spatial scales, during <strong>and</strong>between EN.The dramatic <strong>and</strong> widespread impacts <strong>of</strong> EN 1982–1983 on coastal communities <strong>of</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rnChile allowed <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> biological changes associated with ENSO such as bathymetricor latitudinal migrations, invasion by exotic species, behavioural alterations, reproductive <strong>and</strong>recruitment failures, increasing population abundance, population decrease due to mass mortality,<strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> most severe cases local population extinctions (e.g., see Soto 1985, Tomicic 1985, Arntz1986, Glynn 1988, Camus 1990, Castilla & Camus 1992, Sielfeld et al. 2002, Vega et al. 2005,Arntz et al. 2006, Vásquez et al. 2006). As a whole, <strong>the</strong>se impacts affect all kinds <strong>of</strong> taxa <strong>and</strong>environments, although with clear species- or site-specific components (e.g., in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Chile none<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se effects involves ei<strong>the</strong>r an entire taxonomic group or <strong>the</strong> whole suite <strong>of</strong> species from agiven place; e.g., see Soto 1985, Tomicic 1985). Moreover, <strong>the</strong> type <strong>and</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> impacts, aswell as <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> affected taxa, may vary from one event to ano<strong>the</strong>r, depending both on <strong>the</strong>strength <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> event <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> physical-biological couplings that may take place (e.g., seeNavarrete et al. 2005). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, some biotic modifications may occur, or have simultaneouseffects, at both local <strong>and</strong> regional scales (Camus 1994a, 2001, Vega et al. 2005, Vásquezet al. 2006), as observed also in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast Pacific (Edwards 2004). Additionally, from a socioeconomicperspective, <strong>the</strong> increase or decrease in abundance or diversity <strong>of</strong> fisheries resources atsome places may be certainly interpreted as positive or negative effects, respectively (e.g., Arntz1986). However, from an ecological point <strong>of</strong> view, it would be as yet uncertain to qualify suchchanges in <strong>the</strong> same terms, even for species with no recognisable importance with variations thatmay have unknown or unpredictable consequences for <strong>the</strong> community.Thus, simple generalisations on <strong>the</strong> ecological impacts <strong>of</strong> EN in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Chile may still beinappropriate, except at very specific levels. This situation is mainly because <strong>of</strong> (1) <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong>long-term <strong>and</strong> <strong>system</strong>atic biological observations encompassing several events, preventing robustcomparisons before, during <strong>and</strong> after EN conditions, <strong>and</strong> (2) <strong>the</strong> irregularity <strong>of</strong> ENSO itself (e.g.,Wang et al. 1999) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> correlation between EN <strong>and</strong> LN in <strong>the</strong>ir strength <strong>and</strong> duration(e.g., Kerr 1999). None<strong>the</strong>less, ENSO impacts are indisputably relevant in <strong>the</strong> ecology <strong>of</strong> coastalcommunities in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Chile.One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key aspects needed to underst<strong>and</strong> EN effects is its re<strong>current</strong> impact on ‘engineerspecies’ (sensu Jones et al. 1994) such as kelps, which play a crucial role for <strong>the</strong> diversity,complexity, structure <strong>and</strong> functioning <strong>of</strong> coastal communities along <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>ast Pacific (Graham2004, Vega et al. 2005, Vásquez et al. 2006). Local extinction <strong>of</strong> kelps is frequent during strongEN events (Camus 1994a,b) such as <strong>the</strong> 1982–1983 episode, when intertidal populations <strong>of</strong> Lessonianigrescens <strong>and</strong> Macrocystis integrifolia disappeared from <strong>the</strong> area between 10°S <strong>and</strong> 21°S <strong>and</strong> sodid <strong>the</strong> invertebrate community associated with <strong>the</strong>ir holdfasts (Soto 1985; see also Biogeography,p. 225 ff.). Con<strong>current</strong> <strong>and</strong> dramatic impacts were reported during <strong>the</strong> same event (Soto 1985),affecting ecologically important species <strong>of</strong> ascidians (e.g., Pyura <strong>chile</strong>nsis), seastars (e.g., Stichasterstriatus, Heliaster helianthus) <strong>and</strong> several fish species, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m associated with kelp beds.However, <strong>the</strong> implications <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se impacts, both at population <strong>and</strong> community levels, remainlargely unknown.A long-term series <strong>of</strong> subtidal community dynamics during variable ENSO conditions(1996–2005) has been recently published (Vásquez et al. 2006). Although <strong>the</strong> EN 1997–1998 wascatastrophic <strong>and</strong> produced local kelp extinctions on <strong>the</strong> coasts <strong>of</strong> Chile <strong>and</strong> Peru (Fernández et al.1999, Godoy 2000, Martínez et al. 2003), site-dependent conditions allowed <strong>the</strong> persistence <strong>of</strong>259

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!