12.07.2015 Views

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE HUMBOLDT CURRENT SYSTEM OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CHILEplankton production (Pizarro et al. 1998). In nor<strong>the</strong>rn Chile, <strong>the</strong> diet <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> myctophids Diogenichthyslaternatus <strong>and</strong> Triphoturus oculeus, which feed diurnally <strong>and</strong> share <strong>the</strong> upper water column (0–200m depth), was shown to vary according to prey availability in <strong>the</strong> field. The diets <strong>of</strong> both speciesoverlap in periods <strong>and</strong> areas where food is more abundant (e.g., copepods, copepodids, nauplii,invertebrate eggs <strong>and</strong> ostracods), but differ under conditions <strong>of</strong> low prey availability (Rodríguez-Graña et al. 2005). O<strong>the</strong>r studies in <strong>central</strong> Chile have shown that ei<strong>the</strong>r microplankton concentrationsdid not appear limiting in winter (Castro et al. 2000, Hernández & Castro 2000, Castro 2001)or larval diet overlap occurred among several species but during periods <strong>of</strong> high food abundance(Llanos et al. 1996, Balbontín et al. 1997, Llanos-Rivera et al. 2004). Hence, <strong>the</strong> few studies carriedout on feeding <strong>of</strong> larval fish along <strong>the</strong> HCS in Chile suggest that, although <strong>the</strong> larval food abundancemay vary among seasons <strong>and</strong> localities, starvation due to limiting food availability alone does notseem to be such a common feature, even in seasons <strong>of</strong> lower production (autumn <strong>and</strong> winter). Forstarvation to occur, o<strong>the</strong>r factors may be necessary, such as increased turbulence, which may playa concomitant role during <strong>the</strong> low productivity seasons, at least in sou<strong>the</strong>rn Chile (Cury & Roy1989, Castro et al. 2002). Scarce dietary overlap <strong>and</strong> local morphological <strong>and</strong> physiological adaptations(i.e., increased reserves in fish eggs <strong>and</strong> larger yolk size in fish larvae; Llanos-Rivera &Castro 2004, 2006) seem to exist in larval periods when ontogenetically food is highly necessary(i.e., onset <strong>of</strong> feeding) or when food becomes less abundant in <strong>the</strong> environment (Balbontín et al.1997, Llanos-Rivera et al. 2004, Rodríguez-Graña et al. 2005).For benthic invertebrates, sharp spatial transition in phytoplankton biomass associated withupwelling dynamics has been assumed to have important effects on larval condition (Wieters et al.2003). This assumption is based on <strong>the</strong> idea that phytoplankton is <strong>the</strong> most important food itemfor PL. A major impediment to underst<strong>and</strong>ing how food quantity <strong>and</strong> quality influence larval lifeunder natural conditions is that virtually all published information comes from laboratory rearingstudies in which larvae are <strong>of</strong>fered a monospecific or controlled-mix algal culture. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> firststudies done in <strong>the</strong> HCS analysing feeding preferences in larval invertebrates, by Vargas et al.(2006a), found evidence that barnacle nauplii (Jehlius cirratus <strong>and</strong> Notobalanus flosculus) <strong>and</strong>veligers (Concholepas concholepas) exhibited high consumption <strong>of</strong> heterotrophs (i.e., ciliates <strong>and</strong>din<strong>of</strong>lagellates), but <strong>the</strong> size spectrum <strong>of</strong> food particles removed by barnacle nauplii was in contrastwith those for C. concholepas veligers. Barnacle nauplii preyed heavily on small picophytoplankton(20 µm). Theability <strong>of</strong> barnacle nauplii to feed on small prey hinges on <strong>the</strong> small spaces between <strong>the</strong>ir limbsetules (Stone 1989). This important finding indicates that omnivorous larval feeding should be <strong>the</strong>norm in <strong>the</strong> pelagic eco<strong>system</strong> <strong>and</strong> might explain why larvae maintain positive growth in environmentswhere phytoplankton is thought to be limiting (Crisp et al. 1985). Therefore, <strong>the</strong> scarcepublished information for <strong>the</strong> HCS suggests that <strong>the</strong> inference <strong>of</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> larval condition <strong>and</strong>recruitment over large scales from chl-a biomass, now easily measured from satellite images (e.g.,Thomas et al. 2001b), has to be regarded with caution. The scenario suggests that a large spectrum<strong>of</strong> food particles is available for larval feeding, <strong>and</strong> species may adapt <strong>the</strong>ir feeding preferences inrelation to temporal/spatial food distribution along <strong>the</strong> HCS as well as <strong>the</strong>ir physiology <strong>and</strong> energeticreserves to counteract <strong>the</strong> spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal variations in food quality <strong>and</strong> quantity (Vargas et al.2006b) (Figure 20).Upwelling <strong>and</strong> larval transport processesThe wind-driven seasonal upwelling, besides its paramount effect on PP in <strong>the</strong> coastal zone, inducespr<strong>of</strong>ound changes in <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> coastal waters that directly affect <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>and</strong> abundance<strong>of</strong> organisms in <strong>the</strong> nearshore areas as well as over <strong>the</strong> continental shelf <strong>and</strong> slope. To reside271

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!