MARTIN THIEL ET AL.known about <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> oceanographic factors on recruitment success <strong>and</strong> stock dynamics <strong>of</strong>crustaceans from <strong>the</strong> continental shelf <strong>of</strong>f nor<strong>the</strong>rn-<strong>central</strong> Chile. Most <strong>current</strong> information suggeststhat <strong>the</strong>ir life history is driven by seasonal factors, <strong>and</strong> presently available data do not permit anexamination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> interannual variability in oceanographic conditions (e.g., ENSO) on<strong>the</strong>ir population dynamics. Future studies should address <strong>the</strong>se questions in order to achieve asustainable fishery.Pelagic fisheries <strong>and</strong> fisheries management, 1980–2005The Chilean purse seine fleet mainly exploits five pelagic fish species: anchovy (Engraulis ringens),jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi), chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus), <strong>and</strong> Pacific sardine orpilchard (Sardinops sagax) <strong>and</strong> common sardine (Strangomera bentincki). There were doubts about<strong>the</strong> taxonomic status <strong>of</strong> jack mackerel (Stepien & Rosenblatt 1996, Oyarzún 1998), but a recentmolecular study revealed that <strong>the</strong> name Trachurus murphyi should be conserved (Poulin et al. 2004).In <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial l<strong>and</strong>ing statistics it is also recorded as T. murphyi, but <strong>the</strong> Technical Reports <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Undersecretary <strong>of</strong> Fisheries refer to it as T. symmetricus.History <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> catchesAguilar et al. (2000) described <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chilean pelagic fisheries based on <strong>the</strong>l<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>of</strong> anchovy, jack mackerel <strong>and</strong> pilchard from 1970 to 1995. Herein <strong>the</strong> period from 1995to 2005 (also known as <strong>the</strong> ‘regulated’ period) is included, which adds two additional species: chubmackerel <strong>and</strong> common sardine, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir l<strong>and</strong>ings since 1980.The total annual l<strong>and</strong>ings captured by <strong>the</strong> Chilean purse seine fleet during <strong>the</strong> study period showeda steadily increasing tendency from 1980 until 1995, from 3.4 million t to almost 6.9 million t,driven mainly by <strong>the</strong> increase in jack mackerel l<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>and</strong> secondarily by anchovy l<strong>and</strong>ings,which replaced <strong>the</strong> Pacific sardine, <strong>the</strong> most important species during <strong>the</strong> early 1980s (Figure 26).After that, <strong>the</strong> total annual catch decreased to around <strong>the</strong> same level found at <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>study period, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> 1998, when both species simultaneously showed a sharp declinein <strong>the</strong>ir l<strong>and</strong>ings. However, as stated, <strong>the</strong>se are ‘regulated’ l<strong>and</strong>ings since catches are <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong>fixed total annual quotas <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore not necessarily representative <strong>of</strong> resource availability.Administratively, four <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> five species included in this analysis are latitudinally assignedto fisheries units, each <strong>of</strong> which comprises two to five administrative zones: Regions I–II(18°25′S–26°06′S), Regions III–IV (26°06′S–32°18′S), Regions V–IX (32°18′S–39°37′S) <strong>and</strong>Regions X–XII (39°37′S–56°30′S), <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is a strong difference in l<strong>and</strong>ings between <strong>the</strong> respectivefishery units (Figure 26). Therefore, annual l<strong>and</strong>ings are analysed by species <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se latitudinalfisheries units to visualise <strong>the</strong>ir importance in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. In <strong>the</strong> following text each FisheriesUnit is defined by <strong>the</strong> Regions it contains, e.g., Fisheries Unit I-II.L<strong>and</strong>ing statistics <strong>of</strong> anchovy show <strong>the</strong> typical characteristics <strong>of</strong> engraulids, with successiveincreases <strong>and</strong> decreases, attaining highest l<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>of</strong> 2.7 million t in 1994, but l<strong>and</strong>ings usuallydo not surpass 1.5 million t. Anchovy l<strong>and</strong>ings are most important in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Chile (FisheriesUnit I–II) (Figure 27). In contrast to all o<strong>the</strong>r species, jack mackerel showed a continuous increaseuntil 1995, when annual l<strong>and</strong>ings reached 4.4 million t, after which catches continuously decreasedagain. Throughout this period, catches in <strong>central</strong>-sou<strong>the</strong>rn Chile (Fisheries Unit V–IX) had overridingimportance (Figure 27). The highest l<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>of</strong> chub mackerel were attained in 2003 with0.5 million t. This species has shown a steady increase in l<strong>and</strong>ings during <strong>the</strong> study period. At <strong>the</strong>beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> period, l<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>of</strong> chub mackerel were mainly in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Chile (FisheriesUnit I–II) but since <strong>the</strong> year 2000 also increased in <strong>central</strong>-sou<strong>the</strong>rn Chile (Fisheries Unit V–IX)288
THE HUMBOLDT CURRENT SYSTEM OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CHILEFigure 26 Total annual l<strong>and</strong>ings for <strong>the</strong> five most important pelagic species caught by <strong>the</strong> Chilean purse seinefleet during <strong>the</strong> period 1980–2005; left panel shows SST anomaly, total l<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fivespecies; right panel shows average l<strong>and</strong>ings per latitude <strong>and</strong> year in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four fisheries units, calculatedfor <strong>the</strong> time period 1980–2005.(Figure 27). The highest l<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>of</strong> Pacific sardine were attained in 1985 with almost 2.9 million t.During <strong>the</strong> 1980s this species was <strong>the</strong> most important small pelagic fish captured in Chilean watersbut catches continuously decreased during <strong>the</strong> late 1980s, reaching very low levels in <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s. The Pacific sardine was most important in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Chile (Fisheries Unit I–II) but gainedproportionally in importance in <strong>central</strong>-sou<strong>the</strong>rn Chile (Fisheries Unit V–IX) during <strong>the</strong> early 1990s(Figure 27). The highest l<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>of</strong> common sardine were attained in 1999 with 0.75 million t.During <strong>the</strong> 1980s this species was very scarcely captured in Chilean waters but from <strong>the</strong>n on showeda steady increase (Figure 27). L<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> common sardine were most important in <strong>the</strong> <strong>central</strong>sou<strong>the</strong>rnChile (Fisheries Unit V–IX).Relationships with oceanographic variationsThe coastal areas <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> Chilean coast are known for being typical <strong>of</strong> an EBC <strong>system</strong>, whereupwelling is a characteristic oceanographic feature. Fonseca & Farías (1987) <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r authorsdescribed <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> active upwelling centres in several areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chilean coast, like Iquique(Fuenzalida 1990) <strong>and</strong> Ant<strong>of</strong>agasta in Fisheries Unit I–II (Blanco et al. 2001), Caldera <strong>and</strong>Coquimbo (Acuña et al. 1989) in Fisheries Unit III–IV, Valparaíso (Johnson et al. 1980) <strong>and</strong>Concepción (Cáceres & Arcos 1991) in Fisheries Unit V–IX.289