12.07.2015 Views

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

the humboldt current system of northern and central chile - figema

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE HUMBOLDT CURRENT SYSTEM OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CHILEFisheries also contribute to <strong>the</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> OM from <strong>the</strong> marine toward <strong>the</strong> terrestrial realm.This not only includes direct (extraction) but also indirect forms <strong>of</strong> transfer, such as by scavengingseabirds around fishing vessels at sea (Weichler et al. 2004) or in fishing ports (Ludynia et al. 2005).Populations <strong>of</strong> kelp gulls (Larus dominicanus) near main population centres in nor<strong>the</strong>rn-<strong>central</strong>Chile depend to a large extent on <strong>the</strong>se human-derived food sources, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y <strong>the</strong>n distribute remainsin terrestrial environments (Ludynia et al. 2005).Exchange between environmentsThere is a wide range <strong>of</strong> exchange processes between <strong>the</strong> pelagic <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> benthic environments.This includes, for example, supply <strong>of</strong> POM from <strong>the</strong> water column to s<strong>of</strong>t bottoms where micro<strong>and</strong>macroorganisms remineralise this POM, returning dissolved materials to <strong>the</strong> water column(Graf 1989, Marcus & Boero 1998, Dunton et al. 2005). Suspension feeders are important agents,which aid in transfer <strong>of</strong> suspended material (e.g., phytoplankton <strong>and</strong> kelp detritus) from <strong>the</strong> watercolumn to <strong>the</strong> benthic <strong>system</strong> (Wolff & Alarcón 1993). In some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bays <strong>of</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn-<strong>central</strong>Chile dense stocks <strong>of</strong> natural or culture beds may significantly affect <strong>the</strong>se fluxes (Uribe & Blanco2001, Avendaño & Cantillánez 2005). The intensity <strong>and</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> transfer can be affected byregional discontinuities in <strong>the</strong> oceanographic conditions (e.g., distance from upwelling areas), whichinfluence <strong>the</strong> transport <strong>and</strong> flux <strong>of</strong> POM <strong>and</strong> nutrients (Graco et al. 2006). These processes are alsoexposed to large-scale temporal variations in oceanographic conditions (e.g., ENSO cycles) (Faríaset al. 2004, P. Muñoz et al. 2004b). Fisheries in small fishing ports contribute POM in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong>fish remains to s<strong>of</strong>t bottoms (Sahli 2006).On hard bottoms, macroalgae <strong>and</strong> suspension feeders take up nutrients <strong>and</strong> suspended POMfrom <strong>the</strong> water column, returning algal remains, repackaged faeces or dissolved excretions to <strong>the</strong>water column. Most large kelps are continuously shedding senescent parts (e.g., Tala & Edding2005). These authors estimated that annual export <strong>of</strong> shed plant detritus from a kelp forest <strong>of</strong>Lessonia trabeculata may amount to 18 kg wet wt m −2 . What proportion <strong>of</strong> this detritus remainssuspended in <strong>the</strong> water column or sinks immediately to <strong>the</strong> bottom is not known at present. Kelpproductivity shows some seasonal variation, but kelp detritus is supplied throughout <strong>the</strong> year, atleast in nor<strong>the</strong>rn-<strong>central</strong> Chile (Tala & Edding 2005). This suspended kelp detritus may also sustain<strong>the</strong> large proportion <strong>of</strong> suspension-feeding organisms on intertidal <strong>and</strong> subtidal hard bottoms (seealso Intertidal <strong>and</strong> subtidal hard-bottom communities, p. 235ff. <strong>and</strong> Bustamante & Branch 1996).Little is known about <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> DOC released by kelp forests. It enhances bacterial populations(Delille et al. 1997) <strong>and</strong> contributes to foam lines at <strong>the</strong> sea surface, which are thought to play arole in propagule dispersal <strong>and</strong> survival (Meneses 1993, Shanks et al. 2003a). Foam lines arefrequently observed along <strong>the</strong> coast <strong>of</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn-<strong>central</strong> Chile.Fish consumers also have an important role in energy transfer from benthic toward pelagicenvironments (Angel & Ojeda 2001). This transfer includes all feeding guilds <strong>of</strong> fishes fromherbivores to omnivores <strong>and</strong> carnivores (Angel & Ojeda 2001). Studies <strong>of</strong> trophic coupling betweenhard bottoms <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> water column have mainly focused on kelp forests <strong>and</strong> little is known about<strong>the</strong>se trophic interactions in o<strong>the</strong>r hard-bottom communities (see also Intertidal <strong>and</strong> subtidal hardbottomcommunities, p. 235ff.).Exchange between benthic habitatsExchange between neighbouring communities (NCs) occurs throughout <strong>the</strong> shallow subtidal zone.The form <strong>of</strong> materials exchanged between NCs <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> transport can be highly variable.Algal detritus exported from kelp forests contributes an important food source for animal communitieson intertidal hard bottoms (Bustamante et al. 1995, Bustamante & Branch 1996, Rodríguez-Graña245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!