MARTIN THIEL ET AL.EN events, <strong>the</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> local macha beds can be extremely slow, as observed in Peru (Arntzet al. 2006).The ‘loco’ fishery (sold as ‘Chilean abalone’ in international markets)The loco fishery makes use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> muricid gastropod, Concholepas concholepas, described as atop predator in <strong>the</strong> intertidal <strong>system</strong>s (Castilla & Paine 1987), but with its fished populations mainlyoccurring in <strong>the</strong> subtidal zone (Stotz 1997). In such areas <strong>and</strong> given that its main prey items aresuspension feeders (barnacles, tunicates), <strong>the</strong> species appears more as a browser, through its preytaking advantage <strong>of</strong> high PP in <strong>the</strong> water column near upwelling areas (Stotz 1997, Stotz et al.2003). Thus, production <strong>and</strong> consequently fishery l<strong>and</strong>ings vary greatly along <strong>the</strong> coast, with mainl<strong>and</strong>ing sites coinciding with <strong>the</strong> most important upwelling areas (Figure 24) (Stotz 1997). GivenHigh larval retention withnormally intense recruitmentModerate larval retention withtemporally variable recruitmentPoor larval retention with weak<strong>and</strong> sporadic recruitmentUpwellingHarvest (ind)500,000400,000300,000200,000100,0000Harvest AMERBPta. ChorosN° fishermen = 1501999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004ChañaralCalderaLoco productionHuascoHarvest (ind)25,00020,00015,00010,0005,0000Harvest AMERBPto. OscuroN° fishermen = 301999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004Pta.ChorosCoquimbo?AMERBHarvest (ind)100,00080,00060,00040,00020,0000Harvest AMERBÑagueN° fishermen = 481999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004Los Vilos0 200 400600 800Average annual l<strong>and</strong>ings (t yr −1 )Figure 24 Concholepas concholepas: Variability <strong>of</strong> larval retention <strong>and</strong> recruitment along <strong>the</strong> coast <strong>of</strong> RegionsIII <strong>and</strong> IV, production (average <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 1985–1995) along <strong>the</strong> coast <strong>of</strong> Region IV <strong>and</strong> harvests <strong>of</strong> threeAMERBs located at coastal areas differing in production (note <strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> y-axis). (Figure adapted fromJ. González et al. (2004) <strong>and</strong> Stotz (1997)) Harvest data <strong>of</strong> AMERB obtained from SERNAPESCA (www.sernapesca.cl); stars show for Region IV <strong>the</strong> approximate locations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AMERBs, ‘Area de Manejo yExplotación de Recursos Bentónicos’ (MEABR, Management <strong>and</strong> Exploitation Area for Benthic Resources).282
THE HUMBOLDT CURRENT SYSTEM OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CHILEits complex reproductive biology, which starts with reproductive aggregations for copula, <strong>the</strong> laying<strong>of</strong> egg capsules in which <strong>the</strong> larvae develop for about 30 days, <strong>the</strong>n followed by a 3-month period<strong>of</strong> pelagic life, <strong>the</strong> result is high recruitment variability at temporal <strong>and</strong> spatial scales, dependingon coastal oceanography <strong>and</strong> topography, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> potential for retention areas (Stotz 1997,J. González et al. 2004) (Figure 24). Larvae settle <strong>and</strong> metamorphose mainly on adult barnaclescovering adult shells (Manríquez et al. 2004) or in association with recently settled barnacles (Stotzet al. 1991b), which may vary greatly between years <strong>and</strong> sites (Stotz et al. 1991a). This producesa very complex metapopulation structure (J. González et al. 2004, 2006). However, given its longlife, with individual growth varying greatly (depending on food availability), fluctuations becomepartly attenuated when <strong>the</strong> individuals finally recruit to fisheries at an age between 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 yr witha size <strong>of</strong> 10 cm <strong>of</strong> peristomal opening length (Pérez & Stotz 1992, Stotz & Pérez 1992, Stotz 1997).Thus, while spatial variability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fisheries is great, <strong>the</strong> temporal variability at each site becomespartially attenuated (Figure 22C after 1996), with fluctuations at <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> two to three times,which never<strong>the</strong>less means significant changes in <strong>the</strong> income for fishermen (Figure 24, harvest inAMERBs). The establishment <strong>of</strong> AMERBs, which was mainly motivated by <strong>the</strong> closure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> loc<strong>of</strong>ishery at <strong>the</strong> same time (1989–1992), coincided with a period <strong>of</strong> increased loco stocks along mostparts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>central</strong> Chilean coast, probably favoured by <strong>the</strong> closure <strong>and</strong> a short period in whichfishermen agreed to strictly obey that measure (Stotz 1997). The relationship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong>fishermen to <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> management area was at that time generating an acceptable income,but this situation has mostly changed drastically in <strong>the</strong> following years. At present, many fishermenlocated at coastal areas with low production are dissatisfied <strong>and</strong> willing to ab<strong>and</strong>on <strong>the</strong>ir AMERBs(compare magnitudes <strong>of</strong> harvest <strong>of</strong> AMERBs <strong>and</strong> number <strong>of</strong> fishermen in <strong>the</strong> organisation, shownin Figure 24).Sea urchin fisheryThe urchin Loxechinus albus fishery in <strong>the</strong> HCS between 18°S <strong>and</strong> 35°S is perhaps one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mostvariable ones, in this case natural variability probably being increased as a consequence <strong>of</strong> captures.In <strong>central</strong> Chile (Regions IV–VIII), urchins are restricted to shallow areas with great surge on <strong>the</strong>exposed coast, in which <strong>the</strong> species is partly safe from <strong>the</strong> predation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock shrimp Rhynchocinetestypus (Stotz 2004), a species with abundance <strong>and</strong> distribution pattern that responds to <strong>the</strong>variable existence <strong>of</strong> refuges from its own predators (Caillaux & Stotz 2003). This produces a verypatchy distribution <strong>of</strong> sea urchins. Recruitment occurs mainly inside <strong>the</strong> adult aggregations, whererecruits are protected by <strong>the</strong> spine canopy (Stotz et al. 1992). Thus, when fishermen, takingadvantage <strong>of</strong> calm wea<strong>the</strong>r conditions, reduce <strong>the</strong> stocks, subsequent recruitment is probably heavilyaffected. The observation is that once a site is fished for this species, it only recovers about 10 yrlater (Stotz 2004). Fur<strong>the</strong>r north (Regions I–III, mainly between 20°S <strong>and</strong> 23°S), <strong>the</strong> fluctuationsattenuate slightly <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>ings increase, as large Macrocystis beds appear (Stotz 2004). There, amore conservative exploitation is carried out inside <strong>the</strong> AMERBs, conserving patches, <strong>and</strong> thisstrategy has allowed an increase in numbers, <strong>the</strong> sustainable exploitation <strong>of</strong> which never<strong>the</strong>less stillneeds to be demonstrated (Figure 22D).Resource dynamics <strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> artisanal benthic fisheriesThe great natural spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal variability <strong>of</strong> resources, <strong>and</strong> hence fishery production, whichcharacterises <strong>the</strong> HCS between 18°S <strong>and</strong> 35°S, poses a great challenge to management. Fishermen,through AMERBs <strong>and</strong> legal restrictions, are not allowed to move away when a resource goesthrough a low cycle, as <strong>the</strong>y used to do in <strong>the</strong> past. Illegal movement, though still occurring, isalso increasingly prevented in practice by conflicts with <strong>the</strong> respective local fishers. This produces283