01.12.2012 Views

A decade later - Fundação Luso-Americana

A decade later - Fundação Luso-Americana

A decade later - Fundação Luso-Americana

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

France. The period of the constitutional<br />

monarchy had demonstrated a degree of<br />

openness, with article 6 of the Constitutional<br />

Charter allowing foreigners to practice<br />

other religions as long as their places of<br />

worship did not resemble temples. The<br />

1910 Revolution, however, introduced the<br />

concept of the secular state and laicism, in<br />

effect putting an end to the confessional<br />

state and instituting religious freedom by<br />

means of the law separating church and<br />

state.<br />

In Portugal, the anti-clericalism of the<br />

republicans clashed with a Catholic Church<br />

– still shaken by the annexation of the<br />

Pontificate States and by the laicism of the<br />

3 rd French Republic – but dogmatic nonetheless<br />

and obdurate to republican ideals<br />

and institutions to a degree that <strong>later</strong> on,<br />

many Portuguese Catholics refused to take<br />

part in republican institutions (though this<br />

was not the way Salazar saw it).<br />

“After April 25, 1974 we find not only<br />

political protagonists who had learned the<br />

lessons of the 1 st Republic, but a Catholic<br />

Church that is totally different, a result of<br />

Vatican II, more receptive to understanding<br />

democratic principles and the separation of<br />

church and state.” As Prof. Medeiros Ferreira<br />

reminded the audience, Pope Benedict XVI<br />

praised the separation of church and state<br />

when he visited Portugal.<br />

‘ The united states was the first country<br />

to set up a modern republic and the<br />

first system separating church from<br />

state, which was “very important<br />

because it contradicted the idea that<br />

there had to be a state religion.”<br />

’<br />

A FronTrunner,<br />

LiKe THe 25 TH oF ApriL<br />

Yet even though the topic is important in<br />

the birth of the Portuguese Republic – it<br />

was, in modern terms a “divisive issue<br />

– Medeiros Ferreira believes we must “discuss<br />

the Republic without placing the<br />

religious issue at the center of the debate.”<br />

In Ferreira’s opinion, there are factors<br />

involved that have received little attention<br />

because historiographers and analysts have<br />

fixated on the relations between church<br />

and state and on the political instability<br />

of the times. “These two issues have totally<br />

monopolized the analytical agenda<br />

when it comes to the 1 st Republic.”<br />

poLicy<br />

“in reality, the portuguese republic would carry on – by itself – until 1917, on a continent that<br />

was markedly monarchic and even imperial,” stated medeiros Ferreira.<br />

“It would also be worthwhile to focus<br />

on other issues that have gotten buried,”<br />

Ferreira observes, such as “the pioneering<br />

nature of the Portuguese Republican<br />

Revolution in the context of Europe.” He<br />

explains his outlook in<br />

these terms: “We always<br />

like to say that the 25 th of<br />

April Revolution was the<br />

precursor to the demise of<br />

the other dictatorships in<br />

Europe and South America.<br />

This is true; but the<br />

Republic was also pioneering<br />

in that it fostered the<br />

dissemination of republican<br />

regimes in post-World<br />

War I Europe” at a time<br />

when only France and<br />

Switzerland were republics.<br />

“But even so, it is safe to say that the<br />

Portuguese Republic did not come about<br />

by induction or because of external forces.”<br />

Ferreira stresses that “in reality, the<br />

Portuguese Republic would carry on – by<br />

itself – until 1917, on a continent that was<br />

markedly monarchic and even imperial.”<br />

The second point the professor stresses<br />

is the modernization program of the<br />

Republic. “Once the Republic is in place<br />

we witness the growth of the functions of<br />

a liberal state. It’s the state operating on the<br />

ground.” New public services spring up<br />

such as the civil registry, public education,<br />

compulsory military service and a new<br />

philosophy centered on participation.<br />

Thirdly, Medeiros Ferreira stresses the singularity<br />

of the Portuguese Republican Party<br />

which was different and unique in that it<br />

favored electoral tactics over insurrectional<br />

tactics. “No party at the time (and I’m<br />

talking in European terms) took power like<br />

the PRP did, with weapons, by force.” It<br />

wasn’t exactly a Bolshevist party but it<br />

wasn’t a classical parliamentary party either<br />

like the parties of the 3 rd Republic. It was<br />

an electoralist party of the masses… but<br />

insurrectional at the same time.<br />

Parallel no. 6 | FALL | WINTER 2011 39<br />

RUI OChÔA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!