30.14 Electroweak Theory and the Standard Model 997Timenp(a) Yukawa’s pion modeld u dTimepπ –nnd u upuuu–annihilationdu–uu u–pairproductionupdud d unFigure 30.12 (a) A nuclear interactionbetween a proton and a neutronexplained in terms of Yukawa’spion exchange model. Because thepion carries charge, the proton andneutron switch identities. (b) Thesame interaction explained in termsof quarks and gluons. Note that theexchanged ud quark pair makes up a meson.(b) Quark modelneutrons to form nuclei. It is similar to the residual electromagnetic force thatbinds neutral atoms into molecules. According to QCD, a more basic explanationof nuclear force can be given in terms of quarks and gluons, as shown in Figure30.12, which shows contrasting Feynman diagrams of the same process. Eachquark within the neutron and proton is continually emitting and absorbing virtualgluons and creating and annihilating virtual (qq) pairs. When the neutron andproton approach within 1 fm of each other, these virtual gluons and quarks can beexchanged between the two nucleons, and such exchanges produce the nuclearforce. Figure 30.12b depicts one likely possibility or contribution to the processshown in Figure 30.12a: a down quark emits a virtual gluon (represented by a wavyline in Fig. 30.12b), which creates a uu pair. Both the recoiling d quark and the uare transmitted to the proton where the u annihilates a proton u quark (with thecreation of a gluon) and the d is captured.30.14 ELECTROWEAK THEORY ANDTHE STANDARD MODELRecall that the weak interaction is an extremely short range force having an interactiondistance of approximately 10 18 m (Table 30.1). Such a short-range interactionimplies that the quantized particles which carry the weak field (the spin oneW , W , and Z 0 bosons) are extremely massive, as is indeed the case. These amazingbosons can be thought of as structureless, pointlike particles as massive as kryptonatoms! The weak interaction is responsible for the decay of the c, s, b, and tquarks into lighter, more stable u and d quarks, as well as the decay of the massive and leptons into (lighter) electrons. The weak interaction is very important becauseit governs the stability of the basic particles of matter.A mysterious feature of the weak interaction is its lack of symmetry, especiallywhen compared to the high degree of symmetry shown by the strong, electromagnetic,and gravitational interactions. For example, the weak interaction, unlike thestrong interaction, is not symmetric under mirror reflection or charge exchange.(Mirror reflection means that all the quantities in a given particle reaction are exchangedas in a mirror reflection—left for right, an inward motion toward themirror for an outward motion, etc. Charge exchange means that all the electriccharges in a particle reaction are converted to their opposites—all positives tonegatives and vice versa.) When we say that the weak interaction is not symmetric,we mean that the reaction with all quantities changed occurs less frequentlythan the direct reaction. For example, the decay of the K 0 , which is governedby the weak interaction, is not symmetric under charge exchange because thereaction K 0 : e e occurs much more frequently than the reactionK 0 : e e.In 1979, Sheldon Glashow, Abdus Salam, and Steven Weinberg won a Nobelprize for developing a theory called the electroweak theory that unified theelectromagnetic and weak interactions. This theory postulates that the weak andelectromagnetic interactions have the same strength at very high particle energies,
998 Chapter 30 Nuclear Energy and Elementary ParticlesFigure 30.13 The Standard Modelof particle physics.MATTER AND ENERGYFORCESCONSTITUENTSStrongElectromagneticWeakGravityGluonPhotonW and Z bosonsGravitonQuarksu c td s bLeptonse m t emtA view from inside the LargeElectron–Positron (LEP) collider tunnel,which is 27 km in circumference.Courtesy of CERNand are different manifestations of a single unifying electroweak interaction. Thephoton and the three massive bosons (W and Z 0 ) play a key role in the electroweaktheory. The theory makes many concrete predictions, but perhaps themost spectacular is the prediction of the masses of the W and Z particles at about82 GeV/c 2 and 93 GeV/c 2 , respectively. A 1984 Nobel Prize was awarded to CarloRubbia and Simon van der Meer for their work leading to the discovery of theseparticles at just those energies at the CERN Laboratory in Geneva, Switzerland.The combination of the electroweak theory and QCD for the strong interactionform what is referred to in high energy physics as the Standard Model. Although thedetails of the Standard Model are complex, its essential ingredients can be summarizedwith the help of Figure 30.13. The strong force, mediated by gluons, holdsquarks together to form composite particles such as protons, neutrons, and mesons.Leptons participate only in the electromagnetic and weak interactions. The electromagneticforce is mediated by photons, and the weak force is mediated by W and Zbosons. Note that all fundamental forces are mediated by bosons (particles with spin1) whose properties are given, to a large extent, by symmetries involved in the theories.However, the Standard Model does not answer all questions. A major questionis why the photon has no mass while the W and Z bosons do. Because of this massdifference, the electromagnetic and weak forces are quite distinct at low energies,but become similar in nature at very high energies, where the rest energies of theW and Z bosons are insignificant fractions of their total energies. This behaviorduring the transition from high to low energies, called symmetry breaking, doesn’tanswer the question of the origin of particle masses. To resolve that problem, ahypothetical particle called the Higgs boson has been proposed which provides amechanism for breaking the electroweak symmetry and bestowing different particlemasses on different particles. The Standard Model, including the Higgs mechanism,provides a logically consistent explanation of the massive nature of the Wand Z bosons. Unfortunately, the Higgs boson has not yet been found, but physicistsknow that its mass should be less than 1 TeV/c 2 (10 12 eV).In order to determine whether the Higgs boson exists, two quarks of at least 1 TeVof energy must collide, but calculations show that this requires injecting 40 TeV ofenergy within the volume of a proton. Scientists are convinced that because of thelimited energy available in conventional accelerators using fixed targets, it is necessaryto build colliding-beam accelerators called colliders. The concept of a collideris straightforward. In such a device, particles with equal masses and kinetic energies,traveling in opposite directions in an accelerator ring, collide head-on to producethe required reaction and the formation of new particles. Because the totalmomentum of the interacting particles is zero, all of their kinetic energy is availablefor the reaction. The Large Electron–Positron (LEP) collider at CERN, nearGeneva, Switzerland, and the Stanford Linear Collider in California collide bothelectrons and positrons. The Super Proton Synchrotron at CERN accelerates
- Page 1 and 2:
Color-enhanced scanning electronmic
- Page 3:
876 Chapter 27 Quantum PhysicsSolve
- Page 6 and 7:
27.2 The Photoelectric Effect and t
- Page 8 and 9:
27.3 X-Rays 881even when black card
- Page 10 and 11:
27.4 Diffraction of X-Rays by Cryst
- Page 12 and 13:
27.5 The Compton Effect 885Exercise
- Page 14 and 15:
27.6 The Dual Nature of Light and M
- Page 16 and 17:
27.6 The Dual Nature of Light and M
- Page 18 and 19:
27.8 The Uncertainty Principle 891w
- Page 20 and 21:
27.8 The Uncertainty Principle 893E
- Page 22 and 23:
27.9 The Scanning Tunneling Microsc
- Page 24 and 25:
Problems 897The probability per uni
- Page 26 and 27:
Problems 89917. When light of wavel
- Page 28 and 29:
Problems 90151.time of 5.00 ms. Fin
- Page 30 and 31:
“Neon lights,” commonly used in
- Page 32 and 33:
28.2 Atomic Spectra 905l(nm) 400 50
- Page 34 and 35:
28.3 The Bohr Theory of Hydrogen 90
- Page 36 and 37:
28.3 Th Bohr Theory of Hydrogen 909
- Page 38 and 39:
28.4 Modification of the Bohr Theor
- Page 40 and 41:
28.6 Quantum Mechanics and the Hydr
- Page 42 and 43:
28.7 The Spin Magnetic Quantum Numb
- Page 44 and 45:
28.9 The Exclusion Principle and th
- Page 46 and 47:
28.9 The Exclusion Principle and th
- Page 48 and 49:
28.11 Atomic Transitions 921electro
- Page 50 and 51:
28.12 Lasers and Holography 923is u
- Page 52 and 53:
28.13 Energy Bands in Solids 925Ene
- Page 54 and 55:
28.13 Energy Bands in Solids 927Ene
- Page 56 and 57:
28.14 Semiconductor Devices 929I (m
- Page 58 and 59:
Summary 931(a)Figure 28.32 (a) Jack
- Page 60 and 61:
Problems 9335. Is it possible for a
- Page 62 and 63:
Problems 935tum number n. (e) Shoul
- Page 64 and 65:
Problems 93748. A dimensionless num
- Page 66 and 67:
Aerial view of a nuclear power plan
- Page 68 and 69:
29.1 Some Properties of Nuclei 941T
- Page 70 and 71:
29.2 Binding Energy 943130120110100
- Page 72 and 73:
29.3 Radioactivity 94529.3 RADIOACT
- Page 74 and 75: 29.3 Radioactivity 947INTERACTIVE E
- Page 76 and 77: 29.4 The Decay Processes 949Alpha D
- Page 78 and 79: 29.4 The Decay Processes 951Strateg
- Page 80 and 81: 29.4 The Decay Processes 953they we
- Page 82 and 83: 29.6 Nuclear Reactions 955wounds on
- Page 84 and 85: 29.6 Nuclear Reactions 957EXAMPLE 2
- Page 86 and 87: 29.7 Medical Applications of Radiat
- Page 88 and 89: 29.7 Medical Applications of Radiat
- Page 90 and 91: 29.8 Radiation Detectors 963Figure
- Page 92 and 93: Summary 965Photo Researchers, Inc./
- Page 94 and 95: Problems 967CONCEPTUAL QUESTIONS1.
- Page 96 and 97: Problems 96924. A building has beco
- Page 98 and 99: Problems 97157. A by-product of som
- Page 100 and 101: This photo shows scientist MelissaD
- Page 102 and 103: 30.1 Nuclear Fission 975Applying Ph
- Page 104 and 105: 30.2 Nuclear Reactors 977Courtesy o
- Page 106 and 107: 30.2 Nuclear Reactors 979events in
- Page 108 and 109: 30.3 Nuclear Fusion 981followed by
- Page 110 and 111: 30.3 Nuclear Fusion 983VacuumCurren
- Page 112 and 113: 30.6 Positrons and Other Antipartic
- Page 114 and 115: 30.7 Mesons and the Beginning of Pa
- Page 116 and 117: 30.9 Conservation Laws 989LeptonsLe
- Page 118 and 119: 30.10 Strange Particles and Strange
- Page 120 and 121: 30.12 Quarks 993n pΣ _ Σ 0 Σ + S
- Page 122 and 123: 30.12 Quarks 995charm C 1, its anti
- Page 126 and 127: 30.15 The Cosmic Connection 999prot
- Page 128 and 129: 30.16 Problems and Perspectives 100
- Page 130 and 131: Problems 100330.12 Quarks &30.13 Co
- Page 132 and 133: Problems 1005particles fuse to prod
- Page 134 and 135: Problems 100740. Assume binding ene
- Page 136 and 137: A.1 MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONMany mathe
- Page 138 and 139: A.3 Algebra A.3by 8, we have8x8 32
- Page 140 and 141: A.3 Algebra A.5EXERCISESSolve the f
- Page 142 and 143: A.5 Trigonometry A.7When natural lo
- Page 144 and 145: APPENDIX BAn Abbreviated Table of I
- Page 146 and 147: An Abbreviated Table of Isotopes A.
- Page 148 and 149: An Abbreviated Table of Isotopes A.
- Page 150 and 151: Some Useful Tables A.15TABLE C.3The
- Page 152 and 153: Answers to Quick Quizzes,Odd-Number
- Page 154 and 155: Answers to Quick Quizzes, Odd-Numbe
- Page 156 and 157: Answers to Quick Quizzes, Odd-Numbe
- Page 158 and 159: Answers to Quick Quizzes, Odd-Numbe
- Page 160 and 161: Answers to Quick Quizzes, Odd-Numbe
- Page 162 and 163: Answers to Quick Quizzes, Odd-Numbe
- Page 164 and 165: Answers to Quick Quizzes, Odd-Numbe
- Page 166 and 167: Answers to Quick Quizzes, Odd-Numbe
- Page 168 and 169: IndexPage numbers followed by “f
- Page 170 and 171: Current, 568-573, 586direction of,
- Page 172 and 173: Index I.5Fissionnuclear, 973-976, 9
- Page 174 and 175:
Index I.7Magnetic field(s) (Continu
- Page 176 and 177:
Polarizer, 805-806, 805f, 806-807Po
- Page 178 and 179:
South poleEarth’s geographic, 626
- Page 180 and 181:
CreditsPhotographsThis page constit
- Page 182 and 183:
PEDAGOGICAL USE OF COLORDisplacemen
- Page 184 and 185:
PHYSICAL CONSTANTSQuantity Symbol V