12.07.2015 Views

Untitled - Malaysian Institute of Planners

Untitled - Malaysian Institute of Planners

Untitled - Malaysian Institute of Planners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PLANNING MALAYSIAJournal <strong>of</strong> the Malaysia <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Planners</strong> (2012)Guidelines for Informatory signsThe informatory signs are provided for the convenience <strong>of</strong> road users as well asfor improving the efficiency and safety for roadway. There are fourclassifications <strong>of</strong> informatory signs which are (1) destination signs, (2) distanceSigns, (3) information signs and (4) route markers (Manual <strong>of</strong> Traffic ControlDevices JKR, 2006). This study will be focusing more on the informatory sign.i. Colours and Shapes <strong>of</strong> Guide SignsBasically, the informatory signs are rectangular in shape and the colourgenerally either white letters or symbol and border on blue background.However, for local streets, the letterings and arrows should be yellow incolour.ii.iii.Size <strong>of</strong> Guide SignsThe size <strong>of</strong> informatory signs must be legible to road users and followthe standard size. However, for other guide signs, the legend is sovaried that the size must be fixed in terms <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> wordmessages and the size <strong>of</strong> lettering and spacing necessary for properlegibility are ensured.Lettering On Guide SignsThe lettering for the informatory sign should be clear, open capitalletters <strong>of</strong> the type approved. The names <strong>of</strong> places and rivers should bein lower-case lettering with initial capitals.CASE STUDY OF STATIC INFORMATION SYSTEMSeveral criteria like conspicuity, legibility, distinctiveness, and comprehensionmust be met for a sign to be effective. There are five cognitive features are <strong>of</strong>central concern in sign research (Ng and Chan, 2008). They are familiarity,concreteness, complexity, meaningfulness, and semantic distance. Ng and Chan(2008) employed a 0 to 100 points scale for rating cognitive features.Familiarity is defined in terms <strong>of</strong> the frequency with which icons had beenencountered. For a group <strong>of</strong> novice subjects, significant and positiverelationships were found amongst the cognitive features <strong>of</strong> familiarity,concreteness, meaningfulness and semantic closeness (Ng and Chan, 2008).Furthermore, the study by Schnell (2010) investigated the effect <strong>of</strong>luminance and letter size on the information acquisition time and transfer89© 2012 by MIP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!