ARAB AND WEST ASIAN ORIGINSApproximately 69,000, or 2.9 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>Toronto</strong>nians, have Arab or West Asian orig<strong>in</strong>s (WestAsians <strong>in</strong>clude Afghans, Armenians and Turks). Iranians, number<strong>in</strong>g about 19,400, are <strong>the</strong> largest s<strong>in</strong>glegroup, and <strong>the</strong>re are also sufficient numbers <strong>of</strong> Afghans, Armenians, Egyptians and Lebanese, all about6,000, and Turks, about 2,800, to describe separately.LATIN AMERICAN ORIGINSApproximately 66,000 people <strong>in</strong> <strong>Toronto</strong>, 2.8 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population, have Lat<strong>in</strong> Americanorig<strong>in</strong>s. About 59,000 are South American or Mexican and 7,400 are from Central America. Bothcategories are very heterogeneous, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g nations at different levels <strong>of</strong> economic development, withstrik<strong>in</strong>gly different histories, and with widely vary<strong>in</strong>g patterns <strong>of</strong> immigration to Canada.ABORIGINAL ORIGINSNearly 21,700 people <strong>in</strong> <strong>Toronto</strong> have North American Aborig<strong>in</strong>al ancestry, although only 3,800 didnot also describe <strong>the</strong>mselves as hav<strong>in</strong>g non-Aborig<strong>in</strong>al ancestry. There are not sufficient numbers <strong>of</strong>Métis people, “treaty Indians” or “band members” liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Toronto</strong> to describe <strong>the</strong>m separately. Of <strong>the</strong>17,800 Aborig<strong>in</strong>al people who also <strong>in</strong>dicate a non-Aborig<strong>in</strong>al orig<strong>in</strong>, about 7,000 are also French orBritish, while 10,800 have ano<strong>the</strong>r European orig<strong>in</strong>.The Age Distributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ethno</strong>-<strong>Racial</strong> GroupsThe first row <strong>of</strong> Table 1 shows <strong>the</strong> age distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire population. Children under 15 make up18.0 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population and seniors, 65 or older, account for 12.8 percent; approximately 70percent are between 15 and 64. The relatively low average fertility is shown by <strong>the</strong> greater proportion <strong>of</strong>people between 25 and 44 than under <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> 25, 35.3 versus 30.5 percent. The “ag<strong>in</strong>g” <strong>of</strong> <strong>Toronto</strong>’spopulation is evident from <strong>the</strong> greater number <strong>of</strong> 45-64 year old people relative to those 65 and older,21.4 versus 12.8 percent. At present about one-third <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population over 65 is 75 years or older, whenconcerns about health and self sufficiency start to become more acute.Certa<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g public <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> a chang<strong>in</strong>g age structure, andparticularly <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g proportion <strong>of</strong> older people. Here <strong>the</strong> concern is not with <strong>the</strong> general pattern,but with whe<strong>the</strong>r ethno-racial groups have different age distributions. A key question is whe<strong>the</strong>r<strong>Ethno</strong>-<strong>Racial</strong> <strong>Inequality</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Toronto</strong>: <strong>An</strong>alysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1996 Census 17
population age<strong>in</strong>g is a general or ethnically-specific phenomenon. More broadly, <strong>the</strong> question is whe<strong>the</strong>r<strong>the</strong> groups exhibit different age structures – so that generalizations about, say, <strong>the</strong> impend<strong>in</strong>g effects <strong>of</strong>population age<strong>in</strong>g, said to represent a “typical” condition, do not accurately describe large parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>population, as differentiated <strong>in</strong>to ethno-racial groups.The <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> ethno-racial demographic patterns is complicated by <strong>the</strong> possibility that an<strong>in</strong>dividuals’ ethno-racial identity can change over time. Especially, <strong>the</strong> ethno-racial identity <strong>of</strong> children,<strong>in</strong>itially reported by <strong>the</strong>ir parents, can shift when <strong>the</strong> children become young adults, establish householdsand fill out <strong>the</strong> Census forms <strong>the</strong>mselves. For example, it is not credible, as Table 1 seems to suggest,that Estonians have such a low fertility rate that 29.2 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir population is 75 years or older butonly 4.2 percent are under <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> 15. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> children <strong>of</strong> elderly Estonians must report adifferent ethnicity, ei<strong>the</strong>r because one Estonian parent has a non-Estonian partner or because <strong>the</strong> childrenhave a different identity, perhaps Canadian.In exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ethno-racial groups, what is particularly important is <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> children andelderly relative to <strong>the</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g-age adult population, and also <strong>the</strong> relative sizes <strong>of</strong> adjacent age groups.Large discont<strong>in</strong>uities between age groups, which foretell chang<strong>in</strong>g community needs, are likely to posemore acute problems for communities with fewer resources or where l<strong>in</strong>guistic and cultural barriers limitaccess to ma<strong>in</strong>stream programs.Before consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> groups <strong>in</strong> more detail, it is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to look at one group whose age pr<strong>of</strong>ileis almost stable. In <strong>the</strong> Jewish community, 17.8 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population is under 15 and 11.7 percentare between 15 and 24 – very close to <strong>the</strong> population average and suggest<strong>in</strong>g (neglect<strong>in</strong>g immigration) agentle decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> total population. Then, among Jewish adults, 27.5, 22.8 and 20.2 percent, respectively,are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 25-44, 45-64, and 65 and over age groups. Nearly half <strong>the</strong> over-65 population is over 75. Thisdistribution is quite close to a stable equilibrium. The large proportion <strong>of</strong> aged people represents acommunity that has already adjusted its resources to <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> seniors; and <strong>the</strong> age pr<strong>of</strong>ile does notsuggest a dramatic <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> aged people. Jewish immigration (<strong>in</strong> Table 2, consideredbelow) is also very low. Scann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> age pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>in</strong> Table 1 one sees ethno-racial differences that arecerta<strong>in</strong>ly large enough to affect <strong>the</strong>ir structure, concerns and needs.<strong>Ethno</strong>-<strong>Racial</strong> <strong>Inequality</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Toronto</strong>: <strong>An</strong>alysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1996 Census 18
- Page 6 and 7: origin, South Asians, Arab and West
- Page 8 and 9: Table of ContentsExecutive Summary.
- Page 10 and 11: IntroductionThis Report provides de
- Page 12 and 13: Methodological NotesThis Report pro
- Page 14 and 15: Chapter 1Defining Ethno-Racial Grou
- Page 16 and 17: question, described above. The “C
- Page 18 and 19: “Barbadians.” Likewise, people
- Page 20 and 21: acial identification question, redu
- Page 22 and 23: Table 1, continuedEthno-Racial Grou
- Page 24 and 25: percentage of a group has the need.
- Page 28 and 29: EUROPEAN ORIGIN GROUPS TEND TO BE O
- Page 30 and 31: The key question involves the numbe
- Page 32 and 33: Table 2, continuedPercentage and Nu
- Page 34 and 35: A second policy concern involves th
- Page 36 and 37: NON-NATIONAL, “RACIAL” AND MULT
- Page 38 and 39: Table 3, continuedKnowledge of Engl
- Page 40 and 41: majority of people speak English. T
- Page 42 and 43: Fully 96.1 percent of Torontonians
- Page 44 and 45: Chapter 2EducationIf educational cr
- Page 46 and 47: Table 4, continuedHighest Level of
- Page 48 and 49: Ethno-Racial Inequality in Toronto:
- Page 50 and 51: Educational Attainment of AdultsAbo
- Page 52 and 53: EUROPEAN ORIGINAmong Europeans, edu
- Page 54 and 55: GROUPS WITH HIGHER PROPORTIONS OF N
- Page 56 and 57: Table 5, continuedSchool Attendance
- Page 58 and 59: Ethno-Racial Inequality in Toronto:
- Page 60 and 61: Of most concern are the small numbe
- Page 62 and 63: Not counted as unemployed are “di
- Page 64 and 65: Table 6, continuedLabour Force Char
- Page 66 and 67: Ethno-Racial Inequality in Toronto:
- Page 68 and 69: percent for the African, Black and
- Page 70 and 71: LATIN AMERICAN ORIGINSThe two Latin
- Page 72 and 73: Table 7, continuedIncome from Emplo
- Page 74 and 75: efore coming to Canada likely refle
- Page 76 and 77:
Table 8a, continuedOccupations of W
- Page 78 and 79:
Table 8bOccupations of Men by Ethno
- Page 80 and 81:
Table 8b, continuedOccupations of M
- Page 82 and 83:
Ethno-Racial Inequality in Toronto:
- Page 84 and 85:
eing an employee; just 3.2 percent
- Page 86 and 87:
Table 9, continuedIncidence of Self
- Page 88 and 89:
AFRICAN, BLACK AND CARIBBEAN ORIGIN
- Page 90 and 91:
esult in similar levels of income.
- Page 92 and 93:
Among the individual ethno-racial g
- Page 94 and 95:
Chapter 4Poverty and Individual and
- Page 96 and 97:
Introduction to the TablesThe first
- Page 98 and 99:
Table 10, continuedIncidence of Pov
- Page 100 and 101:
Ethno-Racial Inequality in Toronto:
- Page 102 and 103:
Table 11, continuedIncidence of Chi
- Page 104 and 105:
Ethno-Racial Inequality in Toronto:
- Page 106 and 107:
types of families are not an intuit
- Page 108 and 109:
children and 12.8 percent of Arab/W
- Page 110 and 111:
Table 12, continuedIncidence of Pov
- Page 112 and 113:
Southeast Asians and Pacific Island
- Page 114 and 115:
Table 13, continuedMedian Family In
- Page 116 and 117:
Ethno-Racial Inequality in Toronto:
- Page 118 and 119:
Table 14, continuedMedian Individua
- Page 120 and 121:
Ethno-Racial Inequality in Toronto:
- Page 122 and 123:
SOUTH ASIAN ORIGINSWhile just over
- Page 124 and 125:
LATIN AMERICAN ORIGINSDue to statis
- Page 126 and 127:
There are remarkable ethno-racial d
- Page 128 and 129:
Table 15, continuedHome Ownership o
- Page 130 and 131:
percent of Italian families own the
- Page 132 and 133:
The most severe disadvantage affect
- Page 134 and 135:
Men in Lower SkillJobs(Table 8b/Cha
- Page 136 and 137:
which included all other African na
- Page 138 and 139:
In Lower Skill Non-Manual Occupatio
- Page 140 and 141:
skilled non-manual occupations in 1
- Page 142:
segregation, the effects of unequal