U K R A I N I A N W O M A NOUR ENGLISH COLUMNJean Wolcott PiperWomen's Organizations in USSRHere and there women’s organizationsare mentioned in USSR.On official occasions a woman delegateoften accompanies representativesof different institutions;sometimes these “official”women even organize a meetingwith a prominent guest. DuringEleanor Roosevelt’s tour in USSRa group of distinguished Sovietwomen met her, claiming to berepresentatives of a nation-widewomen’s organization.The word “organization” is incorrectin this connection. An arganizationis a group of peoplewho unite for a common purpose.Their united efforts arevoluntary; their leaders electedby them selves; and, the managementcontrolled by a special com mittee. The duration of membershipis optional with the member.And, he has his duties as well asrights, which are regulated byby-laws. In Soviet Russia thistype of organization does not exist.The women’s organization inUSSR called officially Women’sCouncil has no likeness to thisconception. As in other fields,here also the people are not allowedto unite freely. The W omen’sCouncils are created by themandate of the Communist Party;and their Branches are locatedin economic or administrativeunits — at industrial plants, collectives,or other state-controlledinstitutions. The leaders of theWomen’s Council are appointedthrough Party organs, and theirselections confirmed by formallycontrolledelections.What is the purpose of theseWomen’s Councils? In this com munistic society, where each womanis treated on equal termswith men, and with her own specifictask in building up of thissociety a special approach is notnecessary. It is an outgrowth ofthe circumstances of present-dayCommunist life, with its maingoal to draw as many women aspossible into the building up ofthis society. The avowed purposeof the W omen’s Councils changesbecause of varied and momentaryrequests of the Soviet “line.” Ifthere is a shortage of miningworkers, the W omen’s Councilsimmediately preach of the readinessfor the work of Soviet w omen, and the importance of coalproduction. A shortage of qualifiedworkers on collective farms,and the W omen’s Councils praisethe profession of tractor driversas most becoming to young girls.In short the W omen’s Council islike unto a chameleon assumingan affinity with any circumstances,actual or artificial.Recently, in the Women’sCouncil report of neiw activities,published in the magazine “RadyanskaZhinka,” Feb. 2, 1958, is adescription of the work of a W omen’s Council in the managementof the apartment houses in thePechersk region of Kiev. Accordingto the report members of thisCouncil gave special attention tochildren in their region. They followedtheir school reports and behavior,and advised their parentsin educational difficulties. This isof course an intolerable inquisitorialact designed for the .purposeof the state. Other members assumedtasks in party propaganda,and called on the people in theirhomes to discuss the matterthere — thus stripping them ofthe last vestiges o f that ancientright — “Every man’s house ishis castle.”To us this notice came as aterrible shock because of its doublemeaning. To even the mostsheltered mind its meaning wasclear — that the members of theW omen’s Council are state-appointedagents with the right toinvade any home and interferewith the educational plans o f .parentsfor their children, and alsocompel them to listen to Sovietpropaganda. They ran control, oreliminate, any religious practicesa family may observe. By this infernalprocess they know exactlythe mental attitude of anyone, parentor child in each family, andthe entire area thereabouts to ward Soviet life. In case theCouncil member finds it necessary,she can bring them sharplyinto the Soviet “line.” In otherdays, when Russia oppressed theBaltic countries, the people therekept alive, in their darkenedbasements, by a solitary candle,in whispers, their language andtheir faith. But today, to the Sovietrulers there is no nethermostspot un-inspected or uncontrolledby them. This state of affairs isthe epitome of hell.As the range and power of theW omen’s Councils broadens, thewoman and mother, under theSoviet regime, is ho longer theserenely poised mistress of herhome and her children. Rather sheis the physical vehicle throughwhich the children and the homeare created, for the sole purposeof serving the state. Viewed inits, true light the W omen’s Councilis not an organization. It is aprivately chosen women’s divisiondevoted to governmental supervision,and the spuring of the peoplefor Communist goals.Don’t forget to renew yoursubscription for OUR LIFE
NEW PRESIDENT OF THENATIONAL COUNCIL OFWOMEN OF UNITED STATESMrs. Sophia Yarnall Jacobs,second Vice President of theN.C.W. has been elected as itsPresident at the Annual Convention,held on November 4-5, <strong>1959</strong>in New York City.ACCEPTANCE SPEECHWhat you will want to knowfrom me, is not how difficult thetask ahead will be, but what philosophyI bring- to that task. Aftera month spent in the Soviet Unionthis past Summer, I am more thanever convinced that the VoluntaryW oman’s organization in our owncountry must have substantive.programming, clear direction,flexible and imaginative leadershipand convinced membership.<strong>Our</strong> civilization seems to be ontrial, not only because of the externalthreat o f Communist ideology,but more fundamentally becauseof the softening of our ownmoral fiber. W e have reached apeak of material prosperity whichtends to stifle our dreams anddeaden our aspirations. W e wishwe could recapture the first finefervor of our founding fathers.W ell we can, if we want to badlyenough. Their success was anamalgam of dreams and long,hard, heartbreaking work — evenas any success we may hope formust be.I have spoken briefly this morningof specific program and I donot want to trespass a momentlonger now on the Education discussionin store for us.I do welcome the opportunity,however, of saying to membersand friends of the Council that Iam deeply sensible of the honorpaid me in entrusting the presidencyto me. Having long agorecognized the impossibility oftaking Mrs. Parsons’ place, Iwant yOu to know that I approachthe coming year with personal humilitybut high ambition for theCouncil.Mrs. S. Y. Jacobs, a prominentclub woman and ardent civic w orkeris also known as a free lancewriter for wom en’s magazinesWrs. Sophia Y arnall Jacobsn ew P resid en t of the N ational C ouncil of W omen of U. S.(Good Housekeeping, Parents),promotion manager of PhiladelphiaOrchestra, Director of N ational Urban League, Director ofAmerican Civic Liberties Unionand many others. Mrs. Jacobs hasbeen Second Vice President ofthe National Council o f Women ofthe U. S. since 1956.SEW-TALENTED GIRLWINS STYLE PRIZEA 17-year-old New York U k rainian, Olga Papuha, 133 E. 4thSt., was named grand prize w innerof the teen division of thenational Singer Young ,StylemakerContest on Oct. 29. She is amember of the UW A Branch 28,New York City.She was awarder $600 in cashand a one-week tour through theUnited States for herself and herparents. At the coronation ceremoniesin the Grand Ballroom ofthe Waldorf-Astoria, winningqueens of the three divisions ofthe contest were crowned, andmodeled their prize dresses beforean audience of 1,000 home economicstudents.Olga Papuhia, a tiny brown-hairedgirl who fled with her parentsand sister from Ukraine to escapeRussian occupation, arriving inthe U. S. iri 1949, is a senior atSt. Michael’s High School. Shehopes to be a designer with ashop of her own, and plans to investthe cash prize for this goal.