13.07.2015 Views

VOLUME 1 HUMAN SETTLEMENT PLANNING AND ... - CSIR

VOLUME 1 HUMAN SETTLEMENT PLANNING AND ... - CSIR

VOLUME 1 HUMAN SETTLEMENT PLANNING AND ... - CSIR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GUIDELINES FOR <strong>HUMAN</strong> <strong>SETTLEMENT</strong> <strong>PLANNING</strong> <strong>AND</strong> DESIGNFigure 5.7.2 Conceptual diagram of key spatial relationships relating to collective utilities within upgradeprojectsSource: Behrens and Watson 1996, p 111They indicate the spatial relationships of utilitieswithin, respectively, a “greenfield” and an“upgrade” project.QUANTITATIVE GUIDELINESCollective utility points primarily servinglower-order collective public utilitypointsDensities, alternatives and hierarchiesThe effect of two contextual factors needs to bemade clear in respect of any standards for lowerordercollective public utility points.The density of the areaFor example, in densely populated areas, 15-25dwelling units per standpipe (a rough guide of thethreshhold for a standpipe) can be achieved byplacing a standpipe at the end of each street, andat a maximum distance of 100 m. In more sparselypopulated areas, a walking distance greater thanthe Redistribution and Development Programmestandard of 250 m should not be exceeded, almostirrespective of the threshhold. The walkingdistance will probably prevail over threshholdcriteria.The availability of residential utilitiesFor example, in an area which (say) lacks a door-todoorpostal service and solid-waste collectionservice, but where residential sites each have a toiletand a standpipe, the need for collective toilets andstandpipes will be much lower than where these arenot provided on residential sites. However, at aresidential area collective utility point where saysolid waste, postal and telephone facilities areprovided, collective toilets and standpipes willnevertheless have to be provided for the users ofthe telephones, nearby entrepreneurs and theircustomers, and passers-by.Table 5.7.1 provides only a rough guideline, and thecontext of the specific area being served must beinvestigated, particularly with respect to densitiesand alternative options to the collective utility.In addition, the place on the hierarchy of thecollective points being designed must be borne inmind. For example, if a lowest-order point, toserve 20 dwelling units, includes one waterstandpipe, a second-order point centred aroundsolid-waste collection, public telephones and postboxes could adequately also have only onestandpipe. Although the other utilities here maybe serving 200 or more dwelling units, thestandpipe is not also serving 200 dwelling units,Public utilities Chapter 5.75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!